"I was in a very deep, dark place... I wasn't prepared for that": A qualitative assessment of the emotional well-being needs of patients undergoing cystectomy.

Erica Zeng, Megan Saucke, Alexa Rose, Bhabna Pati, Taviah Levenson, Esra Alagoz, Kyle A Richards
{"title":"\"I was in a very deep, dark place... I wasn't prepared for that\": A qualitative assessment of the emotional well-being needs of patients undergoing cystectomy.","authors":"Erica Zeng, Megan Saucke, Alexa Rose, Bhabna Pati, Taviah Levenson, Esra Alagoz, Kyle A Richards","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies have shown that cystectomy has a large psychological burden on patients with bladder cancer. However, there has been little work characterizing areas of improvement. This project aimed to understand cystectomy patients' experiences and to identify patient-centered methods to improve perioperative support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five focus groups, divided by diversion type and gender, (4 virtual, 1 in person) of patients with bladder cancer (n = 17) who underwent cystectomy were conducted. Conversations were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift© method. Transcripts were coded in NVivo and themes were summarized in higher-level analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients described feelings of depression, anger, and anxiety in response to their cancer diagnosis, need for cystectomy, and living with urinary diversion. Patients experienced daily mental hardship while adapting. They experienced distress from diversion visibility in public and private encounters. Many expressed a dichotomy of feeling grateful for the treatment while also feeling bitter about the impact on their daily life. Patients reported that while their care team provided support for tangible needs, they did not provide information for nor discuss mental and sexual health needs during this time. Patients reported that if their provider had initiated discussions and offered referrals, they would have accepted support. Patients also emphasized the benefit of social and peer support networks for emotional support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Groups identified the psychological difficulties of bladder cancer diagnosis and cystectomy. Potential avenues for improvement included incorporating support resources into the care plan and perioperative discussion regarding the emotional impact of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have shown that cystectomy has a large psychological burden on patients with bladder cancer. However, there has been little work characterizing areas of improvement. This project aimed to understand cystectomy patients' experiences and to identify patient-centered methods to improve perioperative support.

Methods: Five focus groups, divided by diversion type and gender, (4 virtual, 1 in person) of patients with bladder cancer (n = 17) who underwent cystectomy were conducted. Conversations were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift© method. Transcripts were coded in NVivo and themes were summarized in higher-level analysis.

Results: Patients described feelings of depression, anger, and anxiety in response to their cancer diagnosis, need for cystectomy, and living with urinary diversion. Patients experienced daily mental hardship while adapting. They experienced distress from diversion visibility in public and private encounters. Many expressed a dichotomy of feeling grateful for the treatment while also feeling bitter about the impact on their daily life. Patients reported that while their care team provided support for tangible needs, they did not provide information for nor discuss mental and sexual health needs during this time. Patients reported that if their provider had initiated discussions and offered referrals, they would have accepted support. Patients also emphasized the benefit of social and peer support networks for emotional support.

Conclusions: Groups identified the psychological difficulties of bladder cancer diagnosis and cystectomy. Potential avenues for improvement included incorporating support resources into the care plan and perioperative discussion regarding the emotional impact of surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我陷入了深深的黑暗之中...我没有做好心理准备":对接受膀胱切除术的患者的情感需求进行定性评估。
简介研究表明,膀胱切除术会给膀胱癌患者带来很大的心理负担。然而,很少有研究对需要改善的方面进行描述。本项目旨在了解膀胱切除术患者的经历,并找出以患者为中心的方法来改善围手术期的支持:方法: 对接受膀胱切除术的膀胱癌患者(17 人)进行了五次焦点小组讨论(4 次虚拟讨论,1 次面对面讨论),讨论按转流类型和性别划分。采用 "排序与筛选、思考与转移©"方法对谈话内容进行转录和定性分析。在 NVivo 中对记录誊本进行编码,并在更高层次的分析中对主题进行总结:结果:患者描述了因癌症诊断、膀胱切除术和尿路改道而产生的抑郁、愤怒和焦虑情绪。患者在适应过程中经历了日常的精神磨难。无论是在公共场合还是在私人场合,他们都因尿路改道的可见性而感到痛苦。许多人表示,他们对治疗心存感激,同时也对日常生活受到的影响感到痛苦。患者报告说,虽然他们的护理团队为有形需求提供了支持,但在此期间,他们并没有为精神和性健康需求提供信息或进行讨论。患者表示,如果他们的医疗服务提供者能主动与他们进行讨论并提供转介服务,他们就会接受支持。患者还强调了社会和同伴支持网络对情感支持的益处:研究小组发现了膀胱癌诊断和膀胱切除术所带来的心理困难。潜在的改进途径包括将支持资源纳入护理计划,以及在围手术期讨论手术对情绪的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "A 2-center review of histopathology of variants of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and their impact on clinical outcomes" [Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations Volume 42 (2024) 333.e15-333.e20]. Laparoscopic suture-free partial nephrectomy using argon-beam-coagulator: Surgical technique and outcomes of a single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. Editorial Board Table of Contents Cover 2 - Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1