Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) outcomes of unibody and single/double docking limb endografts in Medicare beneficiaries between 2012 and 2018.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1177/17085381241300131
Mark F Conrad, Ami Sood, Alex O'Brien, Sapna Prasad, Erik Zendejas, Matt Thompson
{"title":"Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) outcomes of unibody and single/double docking limb endografts in Medicare beneficiaries between 2012 and 2018.","authors":"Mark F Conrad, Ami Sood, Alex O'Brien, Sapna Prasad, Erik Zendejas, Matt Thompson","doi":"10.1177/17085381241300131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The evaluation of perioperative and long term outcomes for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using anatomic (unibody) and proximal neck fixated (docking limbs) endografts across consecutive time cohorts.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study compares the outcomes of EVAR in Medicare patients stratified by mode of fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent EVAR between 2012 and 2018 were identified in the Medicare database. Anatomic fixation (AF) and proximal fixation (PF) grafts were differentiated using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The AF population was divided into three-time cohorts based on iterative changes in graft design: Cohort 1: (01/01/2012-20/07/2014); Cohort 2: (21/07/2014-09/05/2016); and Cohort 3: (10/05/2016-31/12/2017). The PF cohort was similarly divided into these three periods. Outcomes were evaluated through 31/12/2020 and included all-cause mortality, aortic rupture, and aortic-related reintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32,031 patients underwent EVAR during the study period; 4729 were AF and 27,302 were PF. There were more women (<i>p</i> < .001) and patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (<i>p</i> < .001) in the AF group. There were no group differences in perioperative outcomes. In Cohort 1, there was a higher rate of reintervention (11.9% vs 7.6%; <i>p</i> < .001) and aortic rupture (5.3% vs 4.0%; <i>p</i> = .019) in the AF group compared to the PF group. In Cohort 2, reintervention, aortic rupture, and reintervention rates were similar between the two groups (p = NS). In Cohort 3, the reintervention and aortic rupture rates were similar between the two groups (p = NS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The higher rates of aortic rupture and reintervention seen in the AF group in Cohort 1 when compared with the PF group did not persist in Cohorts 2 and 3. This suggests that improvements in graft design may have led to durability which is similar to that of PF grafts. However, late aneurysm related complications are inherent risks after EVAR and long-term surveillance remains necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381241300131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241300131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The evaluation of perioperative and long term outcomes for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using anatomic (unibody) and proximal neck fixated (docking limbs) endografts across consecutive time cohorts.

Design: This study compares the outcomes of EVAR in Medicare patients stratified by mode of fixation.

Methods: All patients who underwent EVAR between 2012 and 2018 were identified in the Medicare database. Anatomic fixation (AF) and proximal fixation (PF) grafts were differentiated using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The AF population was divided into three-time cohorts based on iterative changes in graft design: Cohort 1: (01/01/2012-20/07/2014); Cohort 2: (21/07/2014-09/05/2016); and Cohort 3: (10/05/2016-31/12/2017). The PF cohort was similarly divided into these three periods. Outcomes were evaluated through 31/12/2020 and included all-cause mortality, aortic rupture, and aortic-related reintervention.

Results: 32,031 patients underwent EVAR during the study period; 4729 were AF and 27,302 were PF. There were more women (p < .001) and patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (p < .001) in the AF group. There were no group differences in perioperative outcomes. In Cohort 1, there was a higher rate of reintervention (11.9% vs 7.6%; p < .001) and aortic rupture (5.3% vs 4.0%; p = .019) in the AF group compared to the PF group. In Cohort 2, reintervention, aortic rupture, and reintervention rates were similar between the two groups (p = NS). In Cohort 3, the reintervention and aortic rupture rates were similar between the two groups (p = NS).

Conclusion: The higher rates of aortic rupture and reintervention seen in the AF group in Cohort 1 when compared with the PF group did not persist in Cohorts 2 and 3. This suggests that improvements in graft design may have led to durability which is similar to that of PF grafts. However, late aneurysm related complications are inherent risks after EVAR and long-term surveillance remains necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2012 年至 2018 年期间,医疗保险受益人使用单体和单/双对接肢内膜移植物进行血管内腹主动脉瘤修补术(EVAR)的疗效。
目的:评估使用解剖型(单体)和近端颈部固定型(对接肢)内移植物进行腹主动脉瘤(AAA)血管内动脉瘤修补术(EVAR)的围术期和长期疗效:本研究比较了按固定方式分层的医疗保险患者的 EVAR 结果:所有在 2012 年至 2018 年期间接受 EVAR 的患者均在医疗保险数据库中进行了识别。使用当前程序术语(CPT)代码对解剖固定(AF)和近端固定(PF)移植物进行区分。根据移植物设计的迭代变化,将 AF 群体分为三个队列:队列 1:(01/01/2012-20/07/2014);队列 2:(21/07/2014-09/05/2016);队列 3:(10/05/2016-31/12/2017)。PF 组群同样分为这三个时期。结果评估至2020年12月31日,包括全因死亡率、主动脉破裂和主动脉相关再介入:研究期间有 32031 名患者接受了 EVAR,其中 4729 人为房颤患者,27302 人为 PF 患者。房颤组中女性(p < .001)和外周血管疾病(PVD)患者(p < .001)更多。围手术期结果没有组间差异。在队列 1 中,房颤组的再介入率(11.9% vs 7.6%; p < .001)和主动脉破裂率(5.3% vs 4.0%; p = .019)高于 PF 组。在队列 2 中,两组的再介入率、主动脉破裂率和再介入率相似(p = NS)。在队列 3 中,两组的再介入率和主动脉破裂率相似(P = NS):结论:与主动脉瓣置换术组相比,主动脉瓣置换术组的主动脉破裂率和再介入率较高,但这一现象在第二组和第三组中并未持续。这表明移植物设计的改进可能导致其耐用性与 PF 移植物相似。然而,EVAR术后动脉瘤相关的晚期并发症是固有的风险,因此仍有必要进行长期监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
期刊最新文献
Association between statin-use and mobility and long-term survival after major lower limb amputation. Factors affecting lower extremity venous insufficiency recurrence following radiofrequency ablation. Identifying venous clinical severity score thresholds for Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology classifications of venous edema and higher. Simultaneous aortoiliac kissing Endovascular stenting for management of isolated monolateral common iliac artery aneurysm with no proximal landing zone. Increased anti-thrombotic therapy is associated with decreased major adverse limb events in patients with low wound and foot infection scores.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1