ASSESSMENT OF SEVERITY OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE AMONG STEADY STATE HBSS AND HBSC HOMOZYGOUS PATIENTS ATTENDING A TERTIARY HEALTH CARE INSTITUTION IN NORTHERN NIGERIA.

Q4 Medicine West African journal of medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-10
S M Oguche, O R Obiako
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF SEVERITY OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE AMONG STEADY STATE HBSS AND HBSC HOMOZYGOUS PATIENTS ATTENDING A TERTIARY HEALTH CARE INSTITUTION IN NORTHERN NIGERIA.","authors":"S M Oguche, O R Obiako","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) among patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) notably HbSS and HbSC are increasingly being recognized due to improved health care a comparative severity of CKD among these subgroups is not known in ABUTH Zaria.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was to assess the severity of kidney function among stable patients with HbSS and HbSC in ABUTH, Zaria.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive study involving steady state 188 HbSS and 22 HbSC attending Haematology Clinic in ABUTH Zaria. The following parameters were assessed; Blood Pressure, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates (eGFR), albuminuria, haematuria, pH, and specific gravity. SPSS version 17.0 for Windows was used Categorical data were represented as charts and tables while continuous variables were represented as mean and standard deviation. Relationships were tested using the student t-test and Pearson's Chi-square.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was observed that 188 (89.5%) have HbSS while 22 (10.5%) have HbSC. The eGFR < 60ml/min/1.73m was higher in participants with HbSC compared to participants with HbSS (13.8% vs. 8.0%, x = 8.5, p = 0.056). The prevalence of Albuminuria > 3mg/mmol among participants with HbSC and HbSS were (68.3% vs. 43.7%, x = 4.37, p =0.043). Haematuria in participants with HbSC and HbSS were (41% vs. 16%, x = 8.11, p = 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference in urine specific gravity, pH, and blood pressure among HbSS and HbSC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has shown that patients with HbSC have worse albuminuria and haematuria than those with HbSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23680,"journal":{"name":"West African journal of medicine","volume":"41 11 Suppl 1","pages":"S45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West African journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) among patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) notably HbSS and HbSC are increasingly being recognized due to improved health care a comparative severity of CKD among these subgroups is not known in ABUTH Zaria.

Objective: This study was to assess the severity of kidney function among stable patients with HbSS and HbSC in ABUTH, Zaria.

Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study involving steady state 188 HbSS and 22 HbSC attending Haematology Clinic in ABUTH Zaria. The following parameters were assessed; Blood Pressure, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates (eGFR), albuminuria, haematuria, pH, and specific gravity. SPSS version 17.0 for Windows was used Categorical data were represented as charts and tables while continuous variables were represented as mean and standard deviation. Relationships were tested using the student t-test and Pearson's Chi-square.

Results: It was observed that 188 (89.5%) have HbSS while 22 (10.5%) have HbSC. The eGFR < 60ml/min/1.73m was higher in participants with HbSC compared to participants with HbSS (13.8% vs. 8.0%, x = 8.5, p = 0.056). The prevalence of Albuminuria > 3mg/mmol among participants with HbSC and HbSS were (68.3% vs. 43.7%, x = 4.37, p =0.043). Haematuria in participants with HbSC and HbSS were (41% vs. 16%, x = 8.11, p = 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference in urine specific gravity, pH, and blood pressure among HbSS and HbSC.

Conclusion: This study has shown that patients with HbSC have worse albuminuria and haematuria than those with HbSS.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估尼日利亚北部一家三级医疗机构的稳定状态 HBSS 和 HBSC 基因同型患者的慢性肾病严重程度。
背景:由于医疗保健水平的提高,镰状细胞病(SCD)患者(尤其是 HbSS 和 HbSC 患者)的慢性肾脏病(CKD)越来越受到重视:本研究旨在评估扎里亚 ABUTH 的 HbSS 和 HbSC 稳定型患者的肾功能严重程度:这项横断面描述性研究涉及扎里亚 ABUTH 血液学诊所的 188 名稳定状态 HbSS 和 22 名 HbSC 患者。对以下参数进行了评估:血压、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、白蛋白尿、血尿、pH 值和比重。使用的是 SPSS 17.0 Windows 版本,分类数据用图表表示,连续变量用平均值和标准偏差表示。使用学生 t 检验和皮尔逊卡方检验两者之间的关系:结果显示,188 人(89.5%)患有 HbSS,22 人(10.5%)患有 HbSC。与 HbSS 患者相比,HbSC 患者的 eGFR < 60ml/min/1.73m更高(13.8% 对 8.0%,x = 8.5,p = 0.056)。白蛋白尿大于 3 毫克/毫摩尔的比例在 HbSC 和 HbSS 患者中分别为(68.3% vs. 43.7%,x = 4.37,p =0.043)。HbSC和HbSS患者出现血尿的比例分别为(41% vs. 16%,x = 8.11,p = 0.004)。HbSS和HbSC患者的尿液比重、pH值和血压差异无统计学意义:本研究表明,与 HbSS 患者相比,HbSC 患者的白蛋白尿和血尿更严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
West African journal of medicine
West African journal of medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
212
期刊最新文献
HOUSEHOLD SMOKING AND INTIMATE PARTNER ABUSE IN JOS SOUTH LGA, PLATEAU STATE. HYPOTHALAMIC PITUITARY AXIS DYSFUNCTION IN A SEVERELY ASPHYXIATED NEONATE. IMPACT OF BRIEF PSYCHO-EDUCATION ON CAREGIVER BURDEN AMONG CAREGIVERS OF CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY IN A NIGERIAN PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL: A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL. INFANTILE COLIC: KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AMONG MOTHERS ATTENDING THE PAEDIATRIC OUTPATIENT CLINIC OF A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN SOUTHERN NIGERIA. INTEGRATION OF MENTAL HEALTH INTO MANAGEMENT OF NON-COMMUNICABLE DISEASES IN PRIMARY CARE: A PROJECT REPORT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1