Lack of diversity in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting: Implications for the Distressed Community Index.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1177/1358863X241292545
Carmen Pajarillo, Gaëlle Romain, Jacob Cleman, Lindsey Scierka, Scott Grubman, Christopher Schenck, Jonathan Kluger, Kim G Smolderen, Carlos Mena-Hurtado
{"title":"Lack of diversity in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting: Implications for the Distressed Community Index.","authors":"Carmen Pajarillo, Gaëlle Romain, Jacob Cleman, Lindsey Scierka, Scott Grubman, Christopher Schenck, Jonathan Kluger, Kim G Smolderen, Carlos Mena-Hurtado","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241292545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As the role of social determinants in carotid artery stenting (CAS) outcomes remains unclear, we investigated the association between the Distressed Community Index (DCI) (zip-code based) and post-CAS mortality/stroke outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed patients undergoing CAS from 2015 to 2019 using the Medicare claims-linked Vascular Quality Initiative database. Patients were grouped based on high (DCI ⩾ 60) and low (DCI < 60) community distress. We analyzed 36-month mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hierarchical Cox regression, and 36-month stroke using cumulative incidence function curves and Fine-Gray models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort included 8717 patients (3032 DCI ⩾ 60), with a mean DCI score of 46.2 (± 28.5) and mean age of 74.7 (± 7.8) years. Most participants were men (64.3%), White (92.7%), and non-Hispanic/Latino (97.7%). There was no significant difference in the 36-month mortality incidence between high and low community distress groups (25.6% vs 23.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.22), and no significant association between high community distress and mortality (unadjusted HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.90-1.21; adjusted HR: 1.02; 95% CI 0.89-1.17). The high community distress group experienced an elevated 36-month stroke incidence (26.8% vs 22.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.048), but no significant association with stroke was observed (unadjusted sub-HR: 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.24; adjusted sub-HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.92-1.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our cohort showed underrepresentation in terms of sex, race, and ethnicity, with a skewed DCI distribution towards lower community distress. Contrary to what we know about community distress, no independent association between higher community distress and post-CAS stroke/mortality risk was found. Future work must examine whether accessibility barriers and selective CAS allocation explain our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X241292545"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X241292545","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As the role of social determinants in carotid artery stenting (CAS) outcomes remains unclear, we investigated the association between the Distressed Community Index (DCI) (zip-code based) and post-CAS mortality/stroke outcomes.

Methods: We analyzed patients undergoing CAS from 2015 to 2019 using the Medicare claims-linked Vascular Quality Initiative database. Patients were grouped based on high (DCI ⩾ 60) and low (DCI < 60) community distress. We analyzed 36-month mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hierarchical Cox regression, and 36-month stroke using cumulative incidence function curves and Fine-Gray models.

Results: The final cohort included 8717 patients (3032 DCI ⩾ 60), with a mean DCI score of 46.2 (± 28.5) and mean age of 74.7 (± 7.8) years. Most participants were men (64.3%), White (92.7%), and non-Hispanic/Latino (97.7%). There was no significant difference in the 36-month mortality incidence between high and low community distress groups (25.6% vs 23.5%, p = 0.22), and no significant association between high community distress and mortality (unadjusted HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.90-1.21; adjusted HR: 1.02; 95% CI 0.89-1.17). The high community distress group experienced an elevated 36-month stroke incidence (26.8% vs 22.4%, p = 0.048), but no significant association with stroke was observed (unadjusted sub-HR: 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.24; adjusted sub-HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.92-1.16).

Conclusion: Our cohort showed underrepresentation in terms of sex, race, and ethnicity, with a skewed DCI distribution towards lower community distress. Contrary to what we know about community distress, no independent association between higher community distress and post-CAS stroke/mortality risk was found. Future work must examine whether accessibility barriers and selective CAS allocation explain our results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受颈动脉支架植入术的患者缺乏多样性:窘迫社区指数的意义。
导言:由于社会决定因素在颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)结果中的作用仍不明确,我们研究了贫困社区指数(DCI)(基于邮政编码)与CAS术后死亡率/卒中结果之间的关联:我们使用与医疗保险索赔相关的血管质量倡议数据库分析了 2015 年至 2019 年接受 CAS 的患者。根据高(DCI ⩾60)和低(DCI <60)社区窘迫程度对患者进行分组。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线和分层 Cox 回归分析了 36 个月的死亡率,使用累积发病率函数曲线和 Fine-Gray 模型分析了 36 个月的中风情况:最终队列包括 8717 名患者(3032 名 DCI ⩾60),平均 DCI 得分为 46.2(± 28.5)分,平均年龄为 74.7(± 7.8)岁。大多数参与者为男性(64.3%)、白人(92.7%)和非西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人(97.7%)。高社区困境组和低社区困境组的 36 个月死亡率无明显差异(25.6% vs 23.5%,P = 0.22),高社区困境与死亡率之间也无明显关联(未调整 HR:1.04;95% CI 0.90-1.21;调整 HR:1.02;95% CI 0.89-1.17)。高度社区窘迫组的 36 个月中风发病率较高(26.8% vs 22.4%,p = 0.048),但未观察到与中风有显著关联(未调整次 HR:1.12;95% CI 1.00-1.24;调整次 HR:1.03;95% CI 0.92-1.16):我们的队列在性别、种族和民族方面都显示出代表性不足,DCI分布偏向于较低的社区痛苦。与我们对社区窘迫的了解相反,我们没有发现较高的社区窘迫与 CAS 后中风/死亡风险之间存在独立联系。未来的工作必须研究交通障碍和选择性 CAS 分配是否能解释我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular Medicine
Vascular Medicine 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The premier, ISI-ranked journal of vascular medicine. Integrates the latest research in vascular biology with advancements for the practice of vascular medicine and vascular surgery. It features original research and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for vascular disease. A member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Mid-term effect of customized graduated elastic compression stockings for managing occupational edema: A randomized controlled trial. Lack of diversity in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting: Implications for the Distressed Community Index. Defining patient goals for therapy in peripheral artery disease: A need for collaborative science. Highlights from the 2024 SVM Vascular Scientific Sessions. Benefits of prophylactic carotid revascularization in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: A narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1