[Comparative analysis of the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban and low molecular weight heparin in the treatment of tumor patients with venous thromboembolism].

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of tumor patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 296 patients diagnosed with tumor associated VTE in the Shanghai Pulmonary Thromboembolism Database from December 2020 to September 2022. Patients were grouped according to the prescription of anticoagulant drugs. Thirteen baseline variables [age, gender, smoking history, physical state (PS) score, tumor type, tumor stage, tumor treatment method, hemoglobin, platelets, D-dimer, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, and VTE site] were matched. After matching, 100 cases were assigned to rivaroxaban group, including 64 males and 36 females, aged [M (Q₁, Q₃)] 70 (62,74) years old; There were 100 cases in the LMWH group, including 69 males and 31 females, aged 68 (60,73) years old. Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves. The differences between the rivaroxaban group and LMWH group in 6-month cumulative VTE recurrence rate, clinically significant bleeding rate, and all-cause mortality rate were analysed using log-rank test. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the rivaroxaban group and the LMWH group in the 6-month cumulative VTE recurrence rate [13.5% (95%CI: 6.4%-20.1%) vs 7.5% (95%CI: 2.0%-12.7%), P=0.171], bleeding incidence rate [9.2% (95%CI: 3.3%-14.8%) vs 6.2% (95%CI: 1.3%-10.9%), P=0.438] and all-cause mortality rate [8.0% (95%CI: 2.5%-13.2%) vs 10.0% (95%CI: 3.9%-15.7%), P=0.602]. Conclusion: The anticoagulant efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and LMWH are comparable in tumor patients with VTE.