Does financing for private maternity services improve birth experiences in Poland? A mixed-methods study of the Babies Born Better Survey.

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/195381
Hanna Kacprzyk, Maria Węgrzynowska, Barbara Baranowska, Piotr Połomski, Marie-Clare Balaam
{"title":"Does financing for private maternity services improve birth experiences in Poland? A mixed-methods study of the Babies Born Better Survey.","authors":"Hanna Kacprzyk, Maria Węgrzynowska, Barbara Baranowska, Piotr Połomski, Marie-Clare Balaam","doi":"10.18332/ejm/195381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Women in Poland, despite having access to publicly-funded medical care during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period, frequently use private care. Women's experience and satisfaction with childbirth have been considered one of the key indicators of the quality of care. In this study we explore whether and how paying for private childbirth services affects women's experiences and satisfaction with care. The qualitative portion seeks to understand how individual women construct meaning around their childbirth experiences, including their relationships with healthcare personnel, medical interventions, birth environment, and professionalism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study is based on data from 951 online questionnaires completed by women who gave birth between June 2017 and June 2022, in Poland. This study is part of the international Babies Born Better Survey project. The project used simultaneous quantitative and qualitative data collection, it was exploratory with equivalent status of qualitative and quantitative data. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and chi-squared tests were conducted to compare women who used private and public care. Qualitative data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The quantitative and qualitative results were integrated, in accordance with the chosen mixed-methods design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no major differences in sociodemographic characteristics (except living standards), health status and satisfaction with labor between women who paid for private services during childbirth and those who used only publicly-funded care. For both groups of women, healthcare personnel and their behavior were the most frequently mentioned aspect shaping childbirth experiences. Other important aspects were: medical interventions, birth environment, and staff professionalism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although accessing private perinatal services care did not provide women with care consistent with their expectations, women put a lot of trust into private services as a means to receive more attentive care. Further research investigating the interplay between private and public services is needed to explore the question how private services may impact the care women receive and why women put so much trust in these services.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"8 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/195381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Women in Poland, despite having access to publicly-funded medical care during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period, frequently use private care. Women's experience and satisfaction with childbirth have been considered one of the key indicators of the quality of care. In this study we explore whether and how paying for private childbirth services affects women's experiences and satisfaction with care. The qualitative portion seeks to understand how individual women construct meaning around their childbirth experiences, including their relationships with healthcare personnel, medical interventions, birth environment, and professionalism.

Methods: This mixed-methods study is based on data from 951 online questionnaires completed by women who gave birth between June 2017 and June 2022, in Poland. This study is part of the international Babies Born Better Survey project. The project used simultaneous quantitative and qualitative data collection, it was exploratory with equivalent status of qualitative and quantitative data. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and chi-squared tests were conducted to compare women who used private and public care. Qualitative data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The quantitative and qualitative results were integrated, in accordance with the chosen mixed-methods design.

Results: There were no major differences in sociodemographic characteristics (except living standards), health status and satisfaction with labor between women who paid for private services during childbirth and those who used only publicly-funded care. For both groups of women, healthcare personnel and their behavior were the most frequently mentioned aspect shaping childbirth experiences. Other important aspects were: medical interventions, birth environment, and staff professionalism.

Conclusions: Although accessing private perinatal services care did not provide women with care consistent with their expectations, women put a lot of trust into private services as a means to receive more attentive care. Further research investigating the interplay between private and public services is needed to explore the question how private services may impact the care women receive and why women put so much trust in these services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在波兰,为私营孕产妇服务提供资金是否能改善分娩体验?婴儿出生得更好调查的混合方法研究。
导言:在波兰,尽管妇女在怀孕、分娩和产后期间可以获得政府资助的医疗服务,但她们也经常使用私人医疗服务。妇女对分娩的体验和满意度被认为是衡量医疗质量的关键指标之一。在本研究中,我们将探讨支付私立分娩服务的费用是否以及如何影响妇女对护理的体验和满意度。定性部分旨在了解妇女个人如何围绕其分娩经历构建意义,包括她们与医护人员的关系、医疗干预、分娩环境和专业性:这项混合方法研究基于 2017 年 6 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在波兰分娩的 951 名妇女填写的在线问卷数据。这项研究是国际 "婴儿出生得更好 "调查项目的一部分。该项目采用定量和定性数据同时收集的方式,具有探索性,定性和定量数据具有同等地位。对定量数据进行了描述性分析,并通过卡方检验对使用私立和公立护理服务的妇女进行了比较。定性数据采用归纳主题分析法进行分析。根据所选择的混合方法设计,对定量和定性结果进行了整合:结果:在社会人口学特征(生活水平除外)、健康状况和对分娩的满意度方面,分娩时付费使用私人服务的妇女与只使用公费护理的妇女之间没有重大差异。对于这两组妇女来说,医护人员及其行为是影响分娩经历的最常提及的方面。其他重要方面包括:医疗干预、分娩环境和医护人员的专业水平:尽管私立围产期保健服务并没有为产妇提供符合其期望的护理,但产妇对私立服务非常信任,将其作为获得更周到护理的一种手段。需要进一步研究私立和公立服务之间的相互作用,以探讨私立服务如何影响产妇获得的护理,以及产妇为何如此信任这些服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ukrainian refugee women's experience with maternity care in Norway: A qualitative study. The lived experiences of newly qualified midwives in supporting women during labor and birth: A hermeneutic phenomenological study in Malta. A two-wave survey study examining the impact of different sources of pregnancy information on pregnancy-related anxiety among Swedish women. Erratum: The role of continuity of care in high-risk pregnant women in Indonesia. Erratum: What midwives should know about fertility awareness and its impact on reproductive behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1