Collecting sociodemographic data in primary care: Qualitative interviews in community health centers.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0095
Rachel Thelen, Sara Bhatti, Jennifer Rayner, Agnes Grudniewicz
{"title":"Collecting sociodemographic data in primary care: Qualitative interviews in community health centers.","authors":"Rachel Thelen, Sara Bhatti, Jennifer Rayner, Agnes Grudniewicz","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many primary care organizations do not routinely collect sociodemographic data (SDD) such as race, gender, or income despite the importance of this data in addressing health disparities.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand the experiences of primary care providers and staff in collecting SDD.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A qualitative interview study with 33 primary care and interprofessional team members from eight Ontario Community Health Centres (CHCs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured virtual interviews and content analysis of interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported using both formal methods of SDD collection, and informal methods of SDD collection that were more organic, varied, and conducted over time. Participants discussed sometimes feeling uncomfortable collecting this data formally, as well as associated burden and limited resources to support collection. Client-provider rapport was noted as facilitating data collection and participants suggested more training, streamlined data collection, and better communication about purpose and use of data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SDD can be collected informally or formally but there are limitations to informally collected data and barriers to the adoption of formal processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many primary care organizations do not routinely collect sociodemographic data (SDD) such as race, gender, or income despite the importance of this data in addressing health disparities.

Aim: To understand the experiences of primary care providers and staff in collecting SDD.

Design & setting: A qualitative interview study with 33 primary care and interprofessional team members from eight Ontario Community Health Centres (CHCs).

Method: Semi-structured virtual interviews and content analysis of interview transcripts.

Results: Participants reported using both formal methods of SDD collection, and informal methods of SDD collection that were more organic, varied, and conducted over time. Participants discussed sometimes feeling uncomfortable collecting this data formally, as well as associated burden and limited resources to support collection. Client-provider rapport was noted as facilitating data collection and participants suggested more training, streamlined data collection, and better communication about purpose and use of data.

Conclusion: SDD can be collected informally or formally but there are limitations to informally collected data and barriers to the adoption of formal processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初级保健中收集社会人口数据:社区医疗中心的定性访谈。
背景:目的:了解初级医疗服务提供者和工作人员在收集社会人口数据(SDD)方面的经验:对安大略省 8 家社区健康中心 (CHC) 的 33 名初级保健和跨专业团队成员进行定性访谈研究:半结构化虚拟访谈和访谈记录内容分析:结果:参与者报告说,他们既使用了正式的 SDD 收集方法,也使用了非正式的 SDD 收集方法,这些方法更加有机、多样,并随着时间的推移而进行。参与者讨论了正式收集这些数据有时会感到不自在,以及相关的负担和用于支持收集的有限资源。与会者指出,客户与医疗服务提供者之间的融洽关系有助于数据收集,并建议提供更多培训、简化数据收集工作以及就数据的目的和用途进行更好的沟通:SDD 可以通过非正式或正式的方式收集,但非正式收集的数据存在局限性,采用正式流程也存在障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
General practice characteristics associated with pay-for-performance in the UK: a systematic review. How do GPs communicate the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway to patients? A qualitative study of GP-patient consultations. Could a behaviour change intervention be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review. Editorial: Global health inequity and primary care. Clinical decision making and risk appraisal using electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) for cancer diagnosis: A qualitative study of GP experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1