Integrating public health & primary care: a framework for seamless collaboration.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0096
Luke N Allen, Bernd Rechel, Dan Alton, Luisa M Pettigrew, Martin McKee, Andrew David Pinto, Josephine Exley, Eleanor Turner-Moss, Kathrin Thomas, Jacqueline Mallander, Dheepa Rajan, Toni Dedeu, Simon Bailey, Nicholas Goodwin
{"title":"Integrating public health & primary care: a framework for seamless collaboration.","authors":"Luke N Allen, Bernd Rechel, Dan Alton, Luisa M Pettigrew, Martin McKee, Andrew David Pinto, Josephine Exley, Eleanor Turner-Moss, Kathrin Thomas, Jacqueline Mallander, Dheepa Rajan, Toni Dedeu, Simon Bailey, Nicholas Goodwin","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integration between public health and primary care is rising on the health policy agenda but the terms and concepts involved can be confusing. This article reviews the relevant literature and presents a new framework to help policymakers think through what they are aiming to achieve and why. We unpack different degrees and types of integration and show how they fit together. We argue that the merger of public health and primary care into a single entity with one aim, budget, and one multidisciplinary team isn't necessarily the desired end-point for most health systems, but that seamless collaboration will likely improve patient and health system outcomes, save resources, and improve population outcomes. We recommend that efforts to foster better collaboration should take an activity-based approach, promoting alignment of teams, training, budgets, values and culture around specific tasks, and in proportion to need.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integration between public health and primary care is rising on the health policy agenda but the terms and concepts involved can be confusing. This article reviews the relevant literature and presents a new framework to help policymakers think through what they are aiming to achieve and why. We unpack different degrees and types of integration and show how they fit together. We argue that the merger of public health and primary care into a single entity with one aim, budget, and one multidisciplinary team isn't necessarily the desired end-point for most health systems, but that seamless collaboration will likely improve patient and health system outcomes, save resources, and improve population outcomes. We recommend that efforts to foster better collaboration should take an activity-based approach, promoting alignment of teams, training, budgets, values and culture around specific tasks, and in proportion to need.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合公共卫生和初级保健:无缝协作框架。
公共卫生与初级医疗之间的整合在卫生政策议程中的地位不断提升,但其中涉及的术语和概念可能令人困惑。本文回顾了相关文献,并提出了一个新的框架,帮助政策制定者思考他们的目标和原因。我们解读了不同程度和类型的整合,并说明了它们是如何相互配合的。我们认为,将公共卫生和初级医疗合并为一个单一的实体,拥有统一的目标、预算和多学科团队,并不一定是大多数医疗系统所期望的终点,但无缝协作可能会改善患者和医疗系统的治疗效果,节约资源,并改善人口的治疗效果。我们建议,促进更好合作的努力应采取以活动为基础的方法,促进团队、培训、预算、价值观和文化围绕具体任务进行调整,并与需求成比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
General practice characteristics associated with pay-for-performance in the UK: a systematic review. How do GPs communicate the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway to patients? A qualitative study of GP-patient consultations. Could a behaviour change intervention be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review. Editorial: Global health inequity and primary care. Clinical decision making and risk appraisal using electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) for cancer diagnosis: A qualitative study of GP experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1