Value of transabdominal ultrasonography for diagnosing functional constipation in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 Q1 PEDIATRICS Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.3345/cep.2024.00927
Duc Long Tran, Phu Nguyen Trong Tran, Paweena Susantitaphong, Phichayut Phinyo, Palittiya Sintusek
{"title":"Value of transabdominal ultrasonography for diagnosing functional constipation in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Duc Long Tran, Phu Nguyen Trong Tran, Paweena Susantitaphong, Phichayut Phinyo, Palittiya Sintusek","doi":"10.3345/cep.2024.00927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transabdominal ultrasonography is increasingly used as a novel modality for detecting pediatric functional constipation (FC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic parameters of FC including rectal diameter (RD) and anterior rectal wall thickness. A systematic search was conducted of the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed databases through September 29, 2023, to identify studies comparing RD and anterior wall thickness using transabdominal ultrasonography in children with versus without FC. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to calculate the weighted mean differences in RD and anterior wall thickness. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis ver. 3, R, and Review Manager ver. 5.4.1 software were used to assess the optimal cutoff, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Fourteen studies involving 1,255 children (mean age, 6.21  2.3 years) were included. The mean RD was significantly larger in constipated children versus controls (mean difference [MD] = 10.35 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.97-13.74; P < 0.001; I2 = 94%). A meta-regression showed no significant effects of age, weight, or height on RD. An optimal RD cutoff point of 31 mm was suggested by a pooled analysis with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.8-0.91; P < 0.001), sensitivity of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.86), and specificity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.68-0.93). The mean anterior rectal wall thickness was greater among constipated children than among controls (MD = 0.44; 95% CI, -0.26 to 1.13; P = 0.22), but this difference was not statistically significant. RD measured using transabdominal ultrasonography with a cutoff point of 31 mm exhibited good diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing FC in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":36018,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2024.00927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transabdominal ultrasonography is increasingly used as a novel modality for detecting pediatric functional constipation (FC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic parameters of FC including rectal diameter (RD) and anterior rectal wall thickness. A systematic search was conducted of the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed databases through September 29, 2023, to identify studies comparing RD and anterior wall thickness using transabdominal ultrasonography in children with versus without FC. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to calculate the weighted mean differences in RD and anterior wall thickness. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis ver. 3, R, and Review Manager ver. 5.4.1 software were used to assess the optimal cutoff, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Fourteen studies involving 1,255 children (mean age, 6.21  2.3 years) were included. The mean RD was significantly larger in constipated children versus controls (mean difference [MD] = 10.35 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.97-13.74; P < 0.001; I2 = 94%). A meta-regression showed no significant effects of age, weight, or height on RD. An optimal RD cutoff point of 31 mm was suggested by a pooled analysis with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.8-0.91; P < 0.001), sensitivity of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.86), and specificity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.68-0.93). The mean anterior rectal wall thickness was greater among constipated children than among controls (MD = 0.44; 95% CI, -0.26 to 1.13; P = 0.22), but this difference was not statistically significant. RD measured using transabdominal ultrasonography with a cutoff point of 31 mm exhibited good diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing FC in children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经腹超声波检查诊断儿童功能性便秘的价值:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
经腹超声波检查作为一种检测小儿功能性便秘(FC)的新型方法,正得到越来越多的应用。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估功能性便秘的诊断参数,包括直肠直径(RD)和直肠前壁厚度。截至 2023 年 9 月 29 日,我们在 Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、Scopus 和 PubMed 数据库中进行了系统性检索,以确定使用经腹超声波检查比较有 FC 和无 FC 儿童的直肠直径和直肠前壁厚度的研究。采用随机效应模型进行 Meta 分析,计算 RD 和前壁厚度的加权平均差异。综合荟萃分析 ver.3、R和Review Manager ver.5.4.1 软件来评估最佳临界值、灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积 (AUC)。共纳入14项研究,涉及1255名儿童(平均年龄6.21  2.3岁)。便秘儿童的平均 RD 明显大于对照组(平均差异 [MD] = 10.35 mm;95% 置信区间 [CI],6.97-13.74;P <0.001;I2 = 94%)。元回归结果显示,年龄、体重或身高对 RD 没有显著影响。汇总分析表明,最佳 RD 临界点为 31 毫米,其 AUC 为 0.86(95% CI,0.8-0.91;P <0.001),灵敏度为 0.75(95% CI,0.59-0.86),特异性为 0.84(95% CI,0.68-0.93)。便秘儿童的直肠前壁平均厚度大于对照组(MD = 0.44;95% CI,-0.26 至 1.13;P = 0.22),但差异无统计学意义。使用经腹超声波测量 RD,以 31 毫米为临界点,在诊断儿童 FC 方面具有良好的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.40%
发文量
88
审稿时长
60 weeks
期刊最新文献
Absolute versus functional iron deficiency. Characteristics of temper tantrums in 1-6-year-old children and impact on caregivers. Effect of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation with intermittent sigh breaths on carbon dioxide levels in neonates. Effect of metabolic syndrome on pulmonary dysfunction in children with asthma. Further research on impact of microplastics on children's health is essential to protecting future generations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1