Conundrums in Implementing Consumer Direction in Home-Based Care: Perspectives of Older Adults and Family Members in China.

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging & Social Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1080/08959420.2024.2422665
Jinbao Zhang, Julia Shu-Huah Wang, Wing Kit Chan, Yongen Chen, Danhong Lan
{"title":"Conundrums in Implementing Consumer Direction in Home-Based Care: Perspectives of Older Adults and Family Members in China.","authors":"Jinbao Zhang, Julia Shu-Huah Wang, Wing Kit Chan, Yongen Chen, Danhong Lan","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2024.2422665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consumer-directed care (CDC) for older people enables clients to arrange personalized services and improves their well-being. However, little is known about clients' preferences for policies in collectivist cultures. We investigate the views of older clients and family members about policies that promote consumer direction in a collectivist cultural setting - Guangzhou, China. Using semi-structured interviews, we recruited older persons and their family members (<i>n</i> = 24) in 2021. Inductive thematic analysis was employed. Two themes emerged. The first theme, the need for flexibility in utilizing benefits, includes the need for: 1) flexibility in selecting care workers; 2) autonomy in choosing budget management agents; 3) flexibility in selecting care-related goods; and 4) adequate and equitable benefits. The second theme, the need for professional support, contains the need for: 1) information and support; and 2) individualized training for care workers. Similar to those in individualistic cultures, people in collectivist environments desire autonomy and choice in service arrangements. However, the welfare and preferences of family members, rather than clients, may be prioritized by family members when making care decisions. Adapting CDC to collectivist cultures requires navigating between client preferences and family preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2024.2422665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer-directed care (CDC) for older people enables clients to arrange personalized services and improves their well-being. However, little is known about clients' preferences for policies in collectivist cultures. We investigate the views of older clients and family members about policies that promote consumer direction in a collectivist cultural setting - Guangzhou, China. Using semi-structured interviews, we recruited older persons and their family members (n = 24) in 2021. Inductive thematic analysis was employed. Two themes emerged. The first theme, the need for flexibility in utilizing benefits, includes the need for: 1) flexibility in selecting care workers; 2) autonomy in choosing budget management agents; 3) flexibility in selecting care-related goods; and 4) adequate and equitable benefits. The second theme, the need for professional support, contains the need for: 1) information and support; and 2) individualized training for care workers. Similar to those in individualistic cultures, people in collectivist environments desire autonomy and choice in service arrangements. However, the welfare and preferences of family members, rather than clients, may be prioritized by family members when making care decisions. Adapting CDC to collectivist cultures requires navigating between client preferences and family preferences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在家庭护理中实施消费者导向的难题:中国老年人和家庭成员的视角》。
针对老年人的 "消费者指导护理"(CDC)使客户能够安排个性化服务,并改善他们的福祉。然而,人们对集体主义文化中客户对政策的偏好知之甚少。我们调查了在集体主义文化背景下--中国广州--老年客户和家庭成员对促进消费者指导政策的看法。通过半结构式访谈,我们在 2021 年招募了老年人及其家庭成员(n = 24)。我们采用了归纳式主题分析法。我们发现了两个主题。第一个主题是灵活使用福利的需求,包括以下需求1) 灵活选择护理人员;2) 自主选择预算管理机构;3) 灵活选择与护理相关的物品;4) 适当且公平的福利。第二个主题是对专业支持的需求,包括对以下方面的需求1) 信息和支持;2) 护理人员的个性化培训。与个人主义文化中的人们类似,集体主义环境中的人们也希望在服务安排方面拥有自主权和选择权。然而,家庭成员在做出护理决定时,可能会优先考虑家庭成员而非服务对象的福利和偏好。要使疾病防治中心适应集体主义文化,就必须在客户偏好和家人偏好之间进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
期刊最新文献
Correction. Elder Caregiving Frequency, Labor Force Participation, and Work. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Effects of COVID-19 on Employment Disruption and Financial Precarity. Conundrums in Implementing Consumer Direction in Home-Based Care: Perspectives of Older Adults and Family Members in China. What is the Relationship Between Older People's Housing Characteristics and Their Care Needs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1