More than Body Appearance! Improving body image in young women through a functionality-focused intervention combined with psychoeducation: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1111/bjc.12514
Silvia Cerea, Anna Panzeri, Beatrice Burdisso, Gioia Bottesi, Paolo Mancin, Martina Rapisarda, Marta Ghisi
{"title":"More than Body Appearance! Improving body image in young women through a functionality-focused intervention combined with psychoeducation: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Silvia Cerea, Anna Panzeri, Beatrice Burdisso, Gioia Bottesi, Paolo Mancin, Martina Rapisarda, Marta Ghisi","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Body dissatisfaction is a public health concern, prevalent among women. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of a 2-week online functionality-focused intervention combined with psychoeducation on improving body image among young women at both high and low risk of Body Image Disorders (BIDs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted among young women at high risk and low risk of developing BIDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 231 young women (n = 64 at high risk of BIDs) were randomized into: experimental (n = 113) and waitlist (n = 118) groups. The experimental group underwent the intervention at baseline (T0) for 15 days (T1), while the waitlist group started the intervention at T1 for 15 days (T2). Participants completed questionnaires about body and functionality appreciation, eating disorders (EDs) risk and extreme body dissatisfaction at baseline, 15 days from baseline and 30 days from baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed linear models revealed enhancements in body and functionality appreciation post-intervention for women at both high risk and low risk of BIDs. Reductions in EDs risk and body dissatisfaction were observed in participants at high risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention proves to be useful in promoting a positive body image (i.e. body and functionality appreciation) in women at both high and low risk of BIDs, while the results concerning the risk of developing EDs and extreme body dissatisfaction are more nuanced.</p>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Body dissatisfaction is a public health concern, prevalent among women. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of a 2-week online functionality-focused intervention combined with psychoeducation on improving body image among young women at both high and low risk of Body Image Disorders (BIDs).

Design: A randomized controlled trial was conducted among young women at high risk and low risk of developing BIDs.

Methods: In total, 231 young women (n = 64 at high risk of BIDs) were randomized into: experimental (n = 113) and waitlist (n = 118) groups. The experimental group underwent the intervention at baseline (T0) for 15 days (T1), while the waitlist group started the intervention at T1 for 15 days (T2). Participants completed questionnaires about body and functionality appreciation, eating disorders (EDs) risk and extreme body dissatisfaction at baseline, 15 days from baseline and 30 days from baseline.

Results: Mixed linear models revealed enhancements in body and functionality appreciation post-intervention for women at both high risk and low risk of BIDs. Reductions in EDs risk and body dissatisfaction were observed in participants at high risk.

Conclusions: The intervention proves to be useful in promoting a positive body image (i.e. body and functionality appreciation) in women at both high and low risk of BIDs, while the results concerning the risk of developing EDs and extreme body dissatisfaction are more nuanced.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不仅仅是身体外观!通过功能性干预与心理教育相结合改善年轻女性的身体形象:随机对照试验
目的:身体不满意是一个公共健康问题,在女性中普遍存在。本研究旨在调查为期两周的在线功能性干预与心理教育相结合对改善身体形象障碍(BIDs)高风险和低风险年轻女性身体形象的效果:设计:在身体形象障碍高风险和低风险年轻女性中开展随机对照试验:总共有 231 名年轻女性(64 名身体形象障碍高危女性)被随机分为实验组(113 人)和候选组(118 人)。实验组在基线(T0)接受为期 15 天(T1)的干预,而候补组在 T1 开始接受为期 15 天(T2)的干预。参与者分别在基线期、基线期后 15 天和基线期后 30 天填写了有关身体和功能评价、饮食失调(ED)风险和身体极度不满意度的问卷:混合线性模型显示,高风险和低风险女性在干预后对身体和功能的评价都有所提高。在高风险参与者中观察到,EDs 风险和身体不满意度有所降低:事实证明,干预措施有助于促进高危和低危女性树立积极的身体形象(即对身体和身体功能的欣赏),而对罹患 ED 的风险和对身体的极端不满意度的影响则更为微妙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
期刊最新文献
More than Body Appearance! Improving body image in young women through a functionality-focused intervention combined with psychoeducation: A randomized controlled trial. A single-session feedback training modifies interpretation bias in individuals with high social anxiety: A randomized controlled trial. Trauma and social pathways to psychosis: Examining the role of attachment, social rank and dissociation in a clinical sample. Ensuring that psychological interventions are delivered as intended on mental health inpatient wards. Predicting optimal treatment allocation for cognitive analytic-guided self-help versus cognitive behavioural-guided self-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1