Extravasation Identification and Management in Neonates and Pediatrics: A Cross Sectional Survey.

Q1 Nursing Hospital pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2023-007698
Linda N Nguyen, Mari Takashima, Jacqueline Cunninghame, Deanne August, Amanda Ullman
{"title":"Extravasation Identification and Management in Neonates and Pediatrics: A Cross Sectional Survey.","authors":"Linda N Nguyen, Mari Takashima, Jacqueline Cunninghame, Deanne August, Amanda Ullman","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2023-007698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore current practice and guidelines surrounding the identification and management of extravasation injuries in Australian and New Zealand neonatal and pediatric settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February and September 2023, an internet-based descriptive cross-sectional survey was distributed to Australian and New Zealand neonatal and pediatric clinicians using exponential nondiscriminative snowball sampling. Survey data domains included demographics, extravasation identification, management, local guidelines, and resources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 141 responses, the majority of respondents were registered nurses (n = 96, 68.1%), with greater than 20 years of experience (n = 51, 36.2%). Over two-thirds of respondents had no extravasation identification and management training (n = 98, 69.5%). Half of the respondents (n = 70, 49.6%) reported that increased presentation of risk factors did not alter monitoring frequency. Extravasations were primarily associated with the hand and wrist region (n = 118, 43.7%). Maintenance fluids, antibiotics and parenteral nutrition accounted for extravasation events. Acute management practices (immediate cessation of infusion) showed consistency (n = 124, 87.9%), whereas varying degrees of adoption were observed for aspirating the residual fluid. The majority of respondents (n = 119, 84%) reported the absence of a formal grading scale for extravasation severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians reported challenges and inconsistencies in neonatal and pediatric extravasation injury identification and management. This underscores the need for effective monitoring and identification, standardized management practices, and education to minimize the burdens of extravasation for patients, families, and the health care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2023-007698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore current practice and guidelines surrounding the identification and management of extravasation injuries in Australian and New Zealand neonatal and pediatric settings.

Methods: Between February and September 2023, an internet-based descriptive cross-sectional survey was distributed to Australian and New Zealand neonatal and pediatric clinicians using exponential nondiscriminative snowball sampling. Survey data domains included demographics, extravasation identification, management, local guidelines, and resources.

Results: Of the 141 responses, the majority of respondents were registered nurses (n = 96, 68.1%), with greater than 20 years of experience (n = 51, 36.2%). Over two-thirds of respondents had no extravasation identification and management training (n = 98, 69.5%). Half of the respondents (n = 70, 49.6%) reported that increased presentation of risk factors did not alter monitoring frequency. Extravasations were primarily associated with the hand and wrist region (n = 118, 43.7%). Maintenance fluids, antibiotics and parenteral nutrition accounted for extravasation events. Acute management practices (immediate cessation of infusion) showed consistency (n = 124, 87.9%), whereas varying degrees of adoption were observed for aspirating the residual fluid. The majority of respondents (n = 119, 84%) reported the absence of a formal grading scale for extravasation severity.

Conclusions: Clinicians reported challenges and inconsistencies in neonatal and pediatric extravasation injury identification and management. This underscores the need for effective monitoring and identification, standardized management practices, and education to minimize the burdens of extravasation for patients, families, and the health care system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿和儿科外渗的识别与处理:横断面调查
目的探讨澳大利亚和新西兰新生儿及儿科在识别和处理外渗损伤方面的现行做法和指南:在 2023 年 2 月至 9 月期间,采用指数非歧视性滚雪球抽样法向澳大利亚和新西兰的新生儿和儿科临床医生分发了一份基于互联网的描述性横断面调查。调查数据领域包括人口统计学、外渗识别、管理、当地指南和资源:在 141 份回复中,大多数受访者是注册护士(n = 96,68.1%),工作经验超过 20 年(n = 51,36.2%)。超过三分之二的受访者没有接受过外渗识别和处理培训(n = 98,69.5%)。半数受访者(n = 70,49.6%)表示,风险因素的增加不会改变监测频率。外渗主要发生在手部和手腕部位(n = 118,43.7%)。外渗事件主要与维持液、抗生素和肠外营养有关。急性处理方法(立即停止输液)显示出一致性(n = 124,87.9%),而吸出残余液体的采用程度则各不相同。大多数受访者(n = 119,84%)表示没有针对外渗严重程度的正式分级表:临床医生报告了新生儿和小儿外渗损伤识别和管理方面的挑战和不一致之处。这强调了有效监测和识别、标准化管理实践和教育的必要性,以尽量减轻外渗给患者、家属和医疗保健系统带来的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
期刊最新文献
Testing and Treatment Thresholds for Pediatric Pneumonia in the Emergency Department. It's More Complicated Than Interpreter Use: Improving Care for Non-English-Speaking Families. Factors Associated With Nirsevimab Uptake in Healthy Newborns. Nirsevimab Administration During the Birth Hospitalization. Extravasation Identification and Management in Neonates and Pediatrics: A Cross Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1