María Anguita-Gámez , David Vivas , Raquel Ferrandis , María Asunción Esteve-Pastor , Rafael González-Manzanares , Marysol Echeverri , Jesús Igualada , Isabel Egocheaga , Beatriz Nozal-Mateo , Ane Abad-Motos , Elena Figuero , Nuria Bouzó-Molina , Teresa Lozano , Carlos Álvarez-Ortega , Javier Torres , María José Descalzo , Juan Carlos Catalá , Enrique Martín-Rioboo , Alejandra Moliner , Rocío Rodríguez-Contreras , Manuel Anguita
{"title":"Adherence to periprocedural antithrombotic treatment recommendations and its prognostic impact in patients with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risk","authors":"María Anguita-Gámez , David Vivas , Raquel Ferrandis , María Asunción Esteve-Pastor , Rafael González-Manzanares , Marysol Echeverri , Jesús Igualada , Isabel Egocheaga , Beatriz Nozal-Mateo , Ane Abad-Motos , Elena Figuero , Nuria Bouzó-Molina , Teresa Lozano , Carlos Álvarez-Ortega , Javier Torres , María José Descalzo , Juan Carlos Catalá , Enrique Martín-Rioboo , Alejandra Moliner , Rocío Rodríguez-Contreras , Manuel Anguita","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>To analyze the clinical impact of the inappropriate use of antithrombotic treatment in patients with high ischemic or hemorrhagic risk during the periprocedural/perisurgical period in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective multicenter observational registry of patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy who required an intervention. The incidence of 30-day events was compared based on the peri-intervention management of antithrombotic treatment and the patients’ risk classification (high vs. moderate-to-low risk). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, cardiovascular ischemic events, or bleeding events classified as BARC 2 or higher.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1152 patients were analyzed. Of these, 1.9% had both high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (A);10.8% had high ischemic risk and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risk (B); 12% had high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C); and 75.3% had both low-to-moderate risks (D). The prevalence of inappropriate treatment was higher in the subgroup with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C) (62.6% vs 40.9% in subgroup A; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.05; 40.3% in subgroup B; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001; and 39.8% in subgroup D; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.05). The incidence of the composite endpoint was higher in the subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (22.7%) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (20.9%), compared with 3.6% in subgroup C (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.05) and 5.7% in subgroup D (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001). Among patients with inappropriate treatment, the incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly higher in subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (44.4% vs 7.7%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.043) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (30% vs 14.8%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.042).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The prevalence of inappropriate periprocedural/perisurgical treatment was higher in patients with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk. The incidence of events was higher in patients with high ischemic risk, with inadequate antithrombotic management being associated with a higher event rate in these groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":"78 5","pages":"Pages 416-424"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1885585724003293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objectives
To analyze the clinical impact of the inappropriate use of antithrombotic treatment in patients with high ischemic or hemorrhagic risk during the periprocedural/perisurgical period in Spain.
Methods
Prospective multicenter observational registry of patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy who required an intervention. The incidence of 30-day events was compared based on the peri-intervention management of antithrombotic treatment and the patients’ risk classification (high vs. moderate-to-low risk). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, cardiovascular ischemic events, or bleeding events classified as BARC 2 or higher.
Results
A total of 1152 patients were analyzed. Of these, 1.9% had both high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (A);10.8% had high ischemic risk and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risk (B); 12% had high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C); and 75.3% had both low-to-moderate risks (D). The prevalence of inappropriate treatment was higher in the subgroup with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk (C) (62.6% vs 40.9% in subgroup A; P < .05; 40.3% in subgroup B; P < .001; and 39.8% in subgroup D; P < .05). The incidence of the composite endpoint was higher in the subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (22.7%) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (20.9%), compared with 3.6% in subgroup C (P < .05) and 5.7% in subgroup D (P < .001). Among patients with inappropriate treatment, the incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly higher in subgroups with high ischemic and hemorrhagic risks (44.4% vs 7.7%; P = .043) and high ischemic and low-to-moderate hemorrhagic risks (30% vs 14.8%; P = .042).
Conclusions
The prevalence of inappropriate periprocedural/perisurgical treatment was higher in patients with high hemorrhagic risk and low-to-moderate ischemic risk. The incidence of events was higher in patients with high ischemic risk, with inadequate antithrombotic management being associated with a higher event rate in these groups.