Increased accessibility of computer-based testing for residency application to a hospital in Brazil with item characteristics comparable to paper-based testing: a psychometric study.

IF 9.3 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.32
Marcos Carvalho Borges, Luciane Loures Santos, Paulo Henrique Manso, Elaine Christine Dantas Moisés, Pedro Soler Coltro, Priscilla Costa Fonseca, Paulo Roberto Alves Gentil, Rodrigo de Carvalho Santana, Lucas Faria Rodrigues, Benedito Carlos Maciel, Hilton Marcos Alves Ricz
{"title":"Increased accessibility of computer-based testing for residency application to a hospital in Brazil with item characteristics comparable to paper-based testing: a psychometric study.","authors":"Marcos Carvalho Borges, Luciane Loures Santos, Paulo Henrique Manso, Elaine Christine Dantas Moisés, Pedro Soler Coltro, Priscilla Costa Fonseca, Paulo Roberto Alves Gentil, Rodrigo de Carvalho Santana, Lucas Faria Rodrigues, Benedito Carlos Maciel, Hilton Marcos Alves Ricz","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the COVID-19 pandemic, online high-stakes exams have become a viable alternative. This study evaluated the feasibility of computer-based testing (CBT) for medical residency applications in Brazil and its impacts on item quality and applicants' access compared to paper-based testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2020, an online CBT was conducted in a Ribeirao Preto Clinical Hospital in Brazil. In total, 120 multiple-choice question items were constructed. Two years later, the exam was performed as paper-based testing. Item construction processes were similar for both exams. Difficulty and discrimination indexes, point-biserial coefficient, difficulty, discrimination, guessing parameters, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were measured based on the item response and classical test theories. Internet stability for applicants was monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2020, 4,846 individuals (57.1% female, mean age of 26.64 ± 3.37 years) applied to the residency program, versus 2,196 individuals (55.2% female, mean age of 26.47 ± 3.20 years) in 2022. For CBT, there was an increase of 2,650 (120.7%) applicants, albeit with significant differences in demographic characteristics. There was a significant increase in applicants from more distant and lower-income Brazilian regions, such as the North (5.6% vs. 2.7%) and Northeast (16.9% vs. 9.0%). No significant differences were found in difficulty and discrimination indexes, point-biserial coefficients, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients between the 2 exams.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Online CBT with multiple-choice questions was a viable format for a residency application exam, improving accessibility without compromising exam integrity and quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"21 ","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: With the COVID-19 pandemic, online high-stakes exams have become a viable alternative. This study evaluated the feasibility of computer-based testing (CBT) for medical residency applications in Brazil and its impacts on item quality and applicants' access compared to paper-based testing.

Methods: In 2020, an online CBT was conducted in a Ribeirao Preto Clinical Hospital in Brazil. In total, 120 multiple-choice question items were constructed. Two years later, the exam was performed as paper-based testing. Item construction processes were similar for both exams. Difficulty and discrimination indexes, point-biserial coefficient, difficulty, discrimination, guessing parameters, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were measured based on the item response and classical test theories. Internet stability for applicants was monitored.

Results: In 2020, 4,846 individuals (57.1% female, mean age of 26.64 ± 3.37 years) applied to the residency program, versus 2,196 individuals (55.2% female, mean age of 26.47 ± 3.20 years) in 2022. For CBT, there was an increase of 2,650 (120.7%) applicants, albeit with significant differences in demographic characteristics. There was a significant increase in applicants from more distant and lower-income Brazilian regions, such as the North (5.6% vs. 2.7%) and Northeast (16.9% vs. 9.0%). No significant differences were found in difficulty and discrimination indexes, point-biserial coefficients, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients between the 2 exams.

Conclusion: Online CBT with multiple-choice questions was a viable format for a residency application exam, improving accessibility without compromising exam integrity and quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高巴西一家医院住院医师申请计算机测试的可及性,其项目特征与纸质测试相当:心理测量学研究。
目的:随着 COVID-19 的流行,在线高风险考试已成为一种可行的选择。本研究评估了在巴西申请住院医师资格时使用计算机辅助考试(CBT)的可行性,以及与纸质考试相比,计算机辅助考试对项目质量和申请人获得考试机会的影响:2020 年,巴西里贝拉普雷图临床医院开展了在线 CBT。共设计了 120 道选择题。两年后,该考试以纸质测试的形式进行。两次考试的题目构建过程相似。根据项目反应理论和经典测验理论,测量了难度和区分度指数、点-比列系数、难度、区分度、猜测参数和克朗巴赫α系数。对申请人的互联网稳定性进行了监测:2020 年有 4846 人(57.1% 为女性,平均年龄为 26.64 ± 3.37 岁)申请住院医师培训项目,而 2022 年为 2196 人(55.2% 为女性,平均年龄为 26.47 ± 3.20 岁)。CBT 的申请人数增加了 2,650 人(120.7%),但在人口统计学特征方面存在显著差异。来自巴西较远和较低收入地区的申请人明显增加,如北部(5.6% 对 2.7%)和东北部(16.9% 对 9.0%)。两种考试的难度和区分度指数、点-比列系数和克朗巴赫α系数均无明显差异:带有多项选择题的在线 CBT 是一种可行的住院医师申请考试形式,既提高了考试的可及性,又不影响考试的完整性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions aims to provide readers the state-of-the art practical information on the educational evaluation for health professions so that to increase the quality of undergraduate, graduate, and continuing education. It is specialized in educational evaluation including adoption of measurement theory to medical health education, promotion of high stakes examination such as national licensing examinations, improvement of nationwide or international programs of education, computer-based testing, computerized adaptive testing, and medical health regulatory bodies. Its field comprises a variety of professions that address public medical health as following but not limited to: Care workers Dental hygienists Dental technicians Dentists Dietitians Emergency medical technicians Health educators Medical record technicians Medical technologists Midwives Nurses Nursing aides Occupational therapists Opticians Oriental medical doctors Oriental medicine dispensers Oriental pharmacists Pharmacists Physical therapists Physicians Prosthetists and Orthotists Radiological technologists Rehabilitation counselor Sanitary technicians Speech-language therapists.
期刊最新文献
Importance, performance frequency, and predicted future importance of dietitians’ jobs by practicing dietitians in Korea: a survey study Presidential address 2024: the expansion of computer-based testing to numerous health professions licensing examinations in Korea, preparation of computer-based practical tests, and adoption of the medical metaverse. Development and validity evidence for the resident-led large group teaching assessment instrument in the United States: a methodological study. ChatGPT (GPT-4) passed the Japanese National License Examination for Pharmacists in 2022, answering all items including those with diagrams: a descriptive study. Discovering social learning ecosystems during clinical clerkship from United States medical students’ feedback encounters: a content analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1