Implementation of the Robocare nursing model for patients undergoing da Vinci robot-assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02159-3

Jing-Jing Wang, Ru-Xiang Chen, Jian-Qin Tang

{"title":"Implementation of the Robocare nursing model for patients undergoing da Vinci robot-assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.","authors":"Jing-Jing Wang, Ru-Xiang Chen, Jian-Qin Tang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02159-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of the Robocare nursing model in patients undergoing da Vinci robot-assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A total of 68 patients who underwent da Vinci robot-assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in our department from January 2022 to June 2022 were enrolled in this study and were assigned to a control group (n = 34) and an intervention group (n = 34). The control group received standard perioperative nursing care, while the intervention group received the Robocare model along with standard care. We compared the differences in postoperative hospital stay length, the incidence of postoperative complications, readmission rates within one month after discharge, and satisfaction with nursing care between the two groups. Compared to the control group, patients in the intervention group exhibited a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (mean 8.94 days vs. 9.76 days, P < 0.05) without an increase in the incidence of postoperative complications (26.5% vs. 29.4%, P > 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in readmission rates within 1 month after discharge between the two groups (14.7% vs. 5.9%, P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (96.34% vs. 91.96%, P < 0.05). The implementation of the Robocare nursing model for patients undergoing da Vinci robot-assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer may reduce the length of postoperative hospital stays without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications, while also enhancing patient satisfaction with nursing care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02159-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of the Robocare nursing model in patients undergoing da Vinci robot-assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A total of 68 patients who underwent da Vinci robot-assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in our department from January 2022 to June 2022 were enrolled in this study and were assigned to a control group (n = 34) and an intervention group (n = 34). The control group received standard perioperative nursing care, while the intervention group received the Robocare model along with standard care. We compared the differences in postoperative hospital stay length, the incidence of postoperative complications, readmission rates within one month after discharge, and satisfaction with nursing care between the two groups. Compared to the control group, patients in the intervention group exhibited a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (mean 8.94 days vs. 9.76 days, P < 0.05) without an increase in the incidence of postoperative complications (26.5% vs. 29.4%, P > 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in readmission rates within 1 month after discharge between the two groups (14.7% vs. 5.9%, P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (96.34% vs. 91.96%, P < 0.05). The implementation of the Robocare nursing model for patients undergoing da Vinci robot-assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer may reduce the length of postoperative hospital stays without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications, while also enhancing patient satisfaction with nursing care.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

为接受达芬奇机器人辅助胃癌根治术的患者实施Robocare护理模式。

本研究旨在评估Robocare护理模式在接受达芬奇机器人辅助胃癌根治术患者中的安全性和可行性。本研究共招募了68名2022年1月至2022年6月在我科接受达芬奇机器人辅助胃癌根治术的患者，并将其分为对照组（34人）和干预组（34人）。对照组接受标准的围手术期护理，而干预组在接受标准护理的同时还接受 Robocare 模式的护理。我们比较了两组患者在术后住院时间、术后并发症发生率、出院后一个月内再入院率和护理满意度方面的差异。与对照组相比，干预组患者的术后住院时间明显缩短（平均 8.94 天对 9.76 天，P 0.05）。此外，两组患者出院后 1 个月内的再入院率也无明显差异（14.7% 对 5.9%，P>0.05）。与对照组相比，干预组患者的满意度明显更高（96.34% 对 91.96%，P

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Robotic Surgery SURGERY-

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

8.70%

发文量

145

期刊介绍： The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.