The Interfunctional Relationship Between Theory of Mind and Private Speech.

IF 1.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology in Russia-State of the Art Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11621/pir.2024.0101
Leonardo Daniel Rivera Valdez, Vicente Arturo López Cortés
{"title":"The Interfunctional Relationship Between Theory of Mind and Private Speech.","authors":"Leonardo Daniel Rivera Valdez, Vicente Arturo López Cortés","doi":"10.11621/pir.2024.0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Theory of mind is the capacity to explain and predict the behavior of others. Charles Fernyhough's dialogical model of psychological functions offers a vision of theory of mind that considers the social dimension and the importance of language, especially inner and private speech, for a person's ability to represent and manipulate multiple perspectives, and its connection to executive function.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is little direct research on Fernyhough's model. The present study addressed that gap by studying the relationship between theory of mind, private speech, and executive function (planning) in the preschool years.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data were collected from a total of 86 preschool children from the Mexican state of Tlaxcala; 24 were from the first grade of preschool, 30 from the second, and 32 from the third. Their degree of internalization and their speech types (<i>i.e</i>., social and private) were obtained by coding their utterances during free play and during performance of a Tower of London task. Lastly, their theory of mind was assessed with a change of location and an unexpected contents task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No correlation was found between children's theory of mind and their degree of internalization. However, inaudible private speech was correlated (negatively) to theory of mind performance in the third grade of preschool. Furthermore, their scores on the Tower of London task were negatively correlated with social speech and positively correlated with inaudible private speech, while the reverse was true for time of execution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggested that the degree of internalization is a measure of the regulative function of language, not the ability to manipulate perspectives, and that it is inadequate for capturing subtle differences between performance and speech types. Role-playing conditions were recommended as better tasks for exploring the capacities for manipulating and understanding different perspectives during the preschool years.</p>","PeriodicalId":44621,"journal":{"name":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","volume":"17 1","pages":"3-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2024.0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Theory of mind is the capacity to explain and predict the behavior of others. Charles Fernyhough's dialogical model of psychological functions offers a vision of theory of mind that considers the social dimension and the importance of language, especially inner and private speech, for a person's ability to represent and manipulate multiple perspectives, and its connection to executive function.

Objective: There is little direct research on Fernyhough's model. The present study addressed that gap by studying the relationship between theory of mind, private speech, and executive function (planning) in the preschool years.

Design: Data were collected from a total of 86 preschool children from the Mexican state of Tlaxcala; 24 were from the first grade of preschool, 30 from the second, and 32 from the third. Their degree of internalization and their speech types (i.e., social and private) were obtained by coding their utterances during free play and during performance of a Tower of London task. Lastly, their theory of mind was assessed with a change of location and an unexpected contents task.

Results: No correlation was found between children's theory of mind and their degree of internalization. However, inaudible private speech was correlated (negatively) to theory of mind performance in the third grade of preschool. Furthermore, their scores on the Tower of London task were negatively correlated with social speech and positively correlated with inaudible private speech, while the reverse was true for time of execution.

Conclusion: The results suggested that the degree of internalization is a measure of the regulative function of language, not the ability to manipulate perspectives, and that it is inadequate for capturing subtle differences between performance and speech types. Role-playing conditions were recommended as better tasks for exploring the capacities for manipulating and understanding different perspectives during the preschool years.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心智理论与私人演讲之间的相互关系。
背景介绍心智理论是解释和预测他人行为的能力。查尔斯-费尼霍夫(Charles Fernyhough)的心理功能对话模型为心智理论提供了一个视角,它考虑到了社会维度和语言(尤其是内心和私人语言)对于一个人表现和处理多种观点的能力的重要性,以及心智理论与执行功能之间的联系:有关费尔尼霍夫模型的直接研究很少。本研究通过研究学龄前儿童的心智理论、内心言语和执行功能(计划)之间的关系来填补这一空白:本研究共收集了墨西哥特拉斯卡拉州 86 名学龄前儿童的数据,其中 24 名来自学龄前一年级,30 名来自学龄前二年级,32 名来自学龄前三年级。通过对他们在自由游戏和完成伦敦塔任务时的言语进行编码,了解了他们的内化程度和言语类型(即社交和私人)。最后,通过位置变化和意外内容任务对他们的心智理论进行了评估:结果:没有发现儿童的心智理论与他们的内化程度有任何关联。然而,在学前三年级,听不见的私人语言与心智理论成绩呈负相关。此外,他们在伦敦塔任务中的得分与社交性言语呈负相关,与听不见的私人言语呈正相关,而执行时间则相反:结果表明,内化程度是对语言调节功能的一种测量,而不是对操纵视角能力的一种测量,它不足以捕捉表演和言语类型之间的细微差别。建议将角色扮演条件作为探索学龄前儿童操纵和理解不同视角能力的更好任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2008, the Russian Psychological Society''s Journal «Psychology in Russia: State of the Art» publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognitive, clinical, developmental, social, neuropsychology, psychophysiology, psychology of labor and ergonomics, and methodology of psychological science. Journal''s list of authors comprises prominent scientists, practitioners and experts from leading Russian universities, research institutions, state ministries and private practice. Addressing current challenges of psychology, it also reviews developments in novel areas such as security, sport, and art psychology, as well as psychology of negotiations, cyberspace and virtual reality. The journal builds upon theoretical foundations laid by the works of Vygotsky, Luria and other Russian scientists whose works contributed to shaping the psychological science worldwide, and welcomes international submissions which make major contributions across the range of psychology, especially appreciating the ones conducted in the paradigm of the Russian psychological tradition. It enjoys a wide international readership and features reports of empirical studies, book reviews and theoretical contributions, which aim to further our understanding of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Agentic Self-regulation of Capoeira Athletes of Different Sports Qualifications. "I Am a Football Player and/or a Girl": Psychosemantics of Self-Consciousness among Teenage Female Football Players. Analysis of Eye and Head Tracking Movements During a Puck-Hitting Task in Ice Hockey Players, Compared to Wrestlers and Controls. Assessing Motivational Factors in Young Serbian Athletes: A Validation Study of the Sport Motivation Scale-II. Competitive Anxiety and Mood States in High-Performance Cuban Student Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1