[Translated article] Reamputation prevalence after minor feet amputations in patients with diabetic foot: A cross sectional study.

C A Sánchez Correa, I Briceño Sanín, J J Bautista Valencia, M E Niño, J Robledo Quijano
{"title":"[Translated article] Reamputation prevalence after minor feet amputations in patients with diabetic foot: A cross sectional study.","authors":"C A Sánchez Correa, I Briceño Sanín, J J Bautista Valencia, M E Niño, J Robledo Quijano","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reported prevalence for reamputation in diabetic foot is diverse, risk factors are not clear for minor amputations. This study aims to determine the prevalence for reamputation in diabetic foot from minor amputations and to evaluate associated factors for such outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross sectional study developed in 2 hospitals. Patients hospitalized for diabetic foot ulcer requiring a minor amputation were included. A descriptive analysis of all variables is presented, as well as prevalence ratios (PR) and a multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence was of 48% for 15 years. Toes were the most frequent minor amputation that required reamputation and above the knee amputation was the most frequent reamputation level (45%). Variables whose PR was associated to reamputation risk were: smoking history (PR 1.32, CI 95%: 1.02-1.67, p=0.03), vascular occlusion in doppler (PR 1.47, CI 95%: 1.11-1.73, p=0.01), revascularization (PR 1.73, CI 95%: 1.31-2.14, p=0.00002), Wagner>3 (PR 1.75, CI 95%: 1.16-1.84, p=0.01) and leucocytosis>11,000 (PR 1.39, CI 95%: 1.07-1.68, p=0.01). Leucocytosis>11,000, Wagner>3, vascular occlusion in doppler and revascularization were the variables that best predicted the outcome. Furthermore, leucocytosis was the best variable for predicting reamputation (OR 2.4, CI 95%: 1.1-5.6, p=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reamputation prevalence was 48%. The toes were the minor amputation more frequently requiring reamputation and above the knee was the most frequent reamputation level. Risk for reamputation was associated with variables related to vascular compromise and infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Reported prevalence for reamputation in diabetic foot is diverse, risk factors are not clear for minor amputations. This study aims to determine the prevalence for reamputation in diabetic foot from minor amputations and to evaluate associated factors for such outcome.

Methods: Cross sectional study developed in 2 hospitals. Patients hospitalized for diabetic foot ulcer requiring a minor amputation were included. A descriptive analysis of all variables is presented, as well as prevalence ratios (PR) and a multivariate logistic regression.

Results: The prevalence was of 48% for 15 years. Toes were the most frequent minor amputation that required reamputation and above the knee amputation was the most frequent reamputation level (45%). Variables whose PR was associated to reamputation risk were: smoking history (PR 1.32, CI 95%: 1.02-1.67, p=0.03), vascular occlusion in doppler (PR 1.47, CI 95%: 1.11-1.73, p=0.01), revascularization (PR 1.73, CI 95%: 1.31-2.14, p=0.00002), Wagner>3 (PR 1.75, CI 95%: 1.16-1.84, p=0.01) and leucocytosis>11,000 (PR 1.39, CI 95%: 1.07-1.68, p=0.01). Leucocytosis>11,000, Wagner>3, vascular occlusion in doppler and revascularization were the variables that best predicted the outcome. Furthermore, leucocytosis was the best variable for predicting reamputation (OR 2.4, CI 95%: 1.1-5.6, p=0.04).

Conclusions: Reamputation prevalence was 48%. The toes were the minor amputation more frequently requiring reamputation and above the knee was the most frequent reamputation level. Risk for reamputation was associated with variables related to vascular compromise and infection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[译文]糖尿病足患者轻微截肢后的再截肢率,一项横断面研究。
导言:据报道,糖尿病足再截肢的发生率各不相同,轻微截肢的风险因素尚不明确。本研究旨在确定糖尿病足轻微截肢后再次截肢的发生率,并评估造成这种结果的相关因素:方法:在两家医院开展横断面研究。方法:在两家医院开展横断面研究,纳入因糖尿病足溃疡住院并需要进行轻微截肢的患者。研究对所有变量进行了描述性分析,并对患病率比(PR)和多变量逻辑回归进行了分析:结果:15 年间,患病率为 48%。脚趾是最常见的需要再次截肢的轻微截肢部位,膝关节以上截肢是最常见的再次截肢部位(45%)。PR与再截肢风险相关的变量有:吸烟史(PR 1.32,CI 95%:1.02-1.67,P = 0.03)、多普勒血管闭塞(PR 1.47,CI 95%:1.11-1.73,P = 0.01)、血管再通(PR 1.73,CI 95%:1.31-2.14,P = 0.00002)、Wagner>3(PR 1.75,CI 95%:1.16-1.84,P = 0.01)和白细胞>11000(PR 1.39,CI 95%:1.07-1.68,P = 0.01)。白细胞>11,000、Wagner>3、多普勒血管闭塞和血管再通是预测结果的最佳变量。此外,白细胞增多是预测再狭窄的最佳变量(OR 2.4,CI 95%:1.1-5.6,P = 0.04):再次截肢率为48%。脚趾是较常需要再次截肢的小截肢部位,膝关节以上是最常发生再次截肢的部位。再次截肢的风险与血管损伤和感染相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
期刊最新文献
Digital Orthopaedic Surgery: Benefits and challenges of extended reality and spatial computing. Ramón y Cajal and the Cartilaginous Growth Plate. [Translated article] New times, identical objectives. Correspondence "Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in traumatology: Conversational answers to specific questions". Does plate fixation improve the Latarjet procedure for anterior glenohumeral instability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1