[Translated article] Retrospective survival analysis of the use of uncemented modular tapered stems for revision in periprosthetic Vancouver B-type fractures. Is instability a threat to survival.

J Lixa, P Vieira, P Pereira, A Pinho, M Seara, A Sousa, L Vieira
{"title":"[Translated article] Retrospective survival analysis of the use of uncemented modular tapered stems for revision in periprosthetic Vancouver B-type fractures. Is instability a threat to survival.","authors":"J Lixa, P Vieira, P Pereira, A Pinho, M Seara, A Sousa, L Vieira","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Periprosthetic hip fractures show increasing incidence and complexity, representing a challenge for the surgeon. We aimed to evaluate the survival of uncemented modular tapered stems in the treatment of periprosthetic Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures and review the main complications and factors associated with decreased survival.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of patients submitted to revision arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic femoral stem Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures with an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem (MRP-Titan). Demographic and radiographic parameters were analyzed. The survival rate (free of reoperation) was calculated at 2- and 5-years using the Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients were included with a mean age of 73.5 years and a mean follow-up of 5 years. Arthroplasty survivorship at 2 years was 73.7% and at 5 years was 67.5% (mean 8.4 years; range 6.7-10.2). Survivorship was inferior in the patients with episodes of instability (mean 2.5 years; range 0-5.42) (p < 0.001). At least one episode of instability occurred in 26.3% of patients and 60% of these patients had a femoral head size 32 mm or lower. At least one episode of instability occurred in 71.4% of patients with a greater trochanter fracture (p = 0.008). The consolidation rate was 90.6% and the mortality rate was 23.7%. In the group of patients that died, 55.6% were submitted to at least one revision surgery (p = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Survivorship of an uncemented modular stem (MRP-Titan) in revision for PHF is significantly reduced by episodes of instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Periprosthetic hip fractures show increasing incidence and complexity, representing a challenge for the surgeon. We aimed to evaluate the survival of uncemented modular tapered stems in the treatment of periprosthetic Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures and review the main complications and factors associated with decreased survival.

Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients submitted to revision arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic femoral stem Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures with an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem (MRP-Titan). Demographic and radiographic parameters were analyzed. The survival rate (free of reoperation) was calculated at 2- and 5-years using the Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis.

Results: Thirty-nine patients were included with a mean age of 73.5 years and a mean follow-up of 5 years. Arthroplasty survivorship at 2 years was 73.7% and at 5 years was 67.5% (mean 8.4 years; range 6.7-10.2). Survivorship was inferior in the patients with episodes of instability (mean 2.5 years; range 0-5.42) (p < 0.001). At least one episode of instability occurred in 26.3% of patients and 60% of these patients had a femoral head size 32 mm or lower. At least one episode of instability occurred in 71.4% of patients with a greater trochanter fracture (p = 0.008). The consolidation rate was 90.6% and the mortality rate was 23.7%. In the group of patients that died, 55.6% were submitted to at least one revision surgery (p = 0.044).

Conclusion: Survivorship of an uncemented modular stem (MRP-Titan) in revision for PHF is significantly reduced by episodes of instability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[译文]对使用非骨水泥模块化锥形柄翻修人工关节周围温哥华B型骨折的生存率进行回顾性分析。不稳定性是否威胁存活率。
引言和目的:髋关节假体周围骨折的发生率和复杂性不断增加,这对外科医生来说是一项挑战。我们旨在评估治疗温哥华B2和B3型假体周围骨折的非骨水泥模块化锥形柄的存活率,并回顾与存活率下降相关的主要并发症和因素:我们对使用非骨水泥模块化凹槽锥形柄(MRP-Titan)治疗股骨柄温哥华B2型和B3型假体周围骨折而接受翻修关节置换术的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。对人口统计学和放射学参数进行了分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 存活率分析法计算了 2 年和 5 年的存活率(无须再次手术):结果:共纳入 39 名患者,平均年龄为 73.5 岁,平均随访时间为 5 年。关节置换术后 2 年的存活率为 73.7%,5 年的存活率为 67.5%(平均 8.4 年;范围 6.7-10.2)。不稳定性发作患者的存活率较低(平均为 2.5 年;范围为 0-5.42)(P 结论:不稳定性发作患者的存活率较高:非骨水泥模块化骨干(MRP-Titan)在PHF翻修中的存活率会因不稳定性发作而显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
期刊最新文献
Digital Orthopaedic Surgery: Benefits and challenges of extended reality and spatial computing. Ramón y Cajal and the Cartilaginous Growth Plate. [Translated article] New times, identical objectives. Correspondence "Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in traumatology: Conversational answers to specific questions". Does plate fixation improve the Latarjet procedure for anterior glenohumeral instability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1