Economic Evaluation of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec from Italian NHS Perspective.

IF 2.1 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S475461
Enrico Torre, Sergio Di Matteo, Giacomo Matteo Bruno, Chiara Martinotti, Luigi Carlo Bottaro, Giorgio Lorenzo Colombo
{"title":"Economic Evaluation of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec from Italian NHS Perspective.","authors":"Enrico Torre, Sergio Di Matteo, Giacomo Matteo Bruno, Chiara Martinotti, Luigi Carlo Bottaro, Giorgio Lorenzo Colombo","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S475461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Icodec, once-weekly basal insulin, aims to simplify therapy management by reducing injection frequency for diabetic patients. The efficacy and safety of icodec were evaluated in the ONWARDS clinical development program. This study evaluates icodec economic and quality of life impact from the Italian National Healthcare System (NHS) perspective.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A pharmacoeconomic study was developed to assess the once-weekly insulin icodec value, highlighting its potential to decrease needle use while improving adherence and quality of life. In the base case, a differential cost and cost-utility analysis over one year compared to once-daily insulin degludec were developed. Based on the comparison with degludec, a scenario analysis was planned between icodec and the mix of basal insulins available on the market. Economic evaluations included drug and administration costs, needles, and impact on adherence. The cost-utility analysis measured the utility associated with the weekly injection compared to the daily ones, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured as Δ€/ΔQALY (Quality Adjusted Life Years). To assess the robustness of the results, a deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At an annual cost 25% higher than degludec, considering the economic benefits generated by the needle use reduction (-€51.10) and adherence improvement (-€54.85), once-weekly icodec grants no incremental cost and even potential savings per patient. Furthermore, icodec reported a utility advantage (0.023). It achieved a dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to degludec. The comparison with the mix of basal insulins also reported a cost-effectiveness profile. Sensitivity tests conducted confirmed the robustness of the findings, highlighting the key drivers of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Icodec represents a new therapeutic option to simplify basal insulin treatment. It also improves the patient's management and his quality of life, without increasing the economic burden for the Italian NHS, while guaranteeing an excellent cost-effectiveness profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"799-811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S475461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Icodec, once-weekly basal insulin, aims to simplify therapy management by reducing injection frequency for diabetic patients. The efficacy and safety of icodec were evaluated in the ONWARDS clinical development program. This study evaluates icodec economic and quality of life impact from the Italian National Healthcare System (NHS) perspective.

Materials and methods: A pharmacoeconomic study was developed to assess the once-weekly insulin icodec value, highlighting its potential to decrease needle use while improving adherence and quality of life. In the base case, a differential cost and cost-utility analysis over one year compared to once-daily insulin degludec were developed. Based on the comparison with degludec, a scenario analysis was planned between icodec and the mix of basal insulins available on the market. Economic evaluations included drug and administration costs, needles, and impact on adherence. The cost-utility analysis measured the utility associated with the weekly injection compared to the daily ones, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured as Δ€/ΔQALY (Quality Adjusted Life Years). To assess the robustness of the results, a deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were carried out.

Results: At an annual cost 25% higher than degludec, considering the economic benefits generated by the needle use reduction (-€51.10) and adherence improvement (-€54.85), once-weekly icodec grants no incremental cost and even potential savings per patient. Furthermore, icodec reported a utility advantage (0.023). It achieved a dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to degludec. The comparison with the mix of basal insulins also reported a cost-effectiveness profile. Sensitivity tests conducted confirmed the robustness of the findings, highlighting the key drivers of the analysis.

Conclusion: Icodec represents a new therapeutic option to simplify basal insulin treatment. It also improves the patient's management and his quality of life, without increasing the economic burden for the Italian NHS, while guaranteeing an excellent cost-effectiveness profile.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从意大利国家医疗服务体系的角度对每周一次的伊科达克胰岛素进行经济评估。
背景介绍每周注射一次的基础胰岛素 Icodec 旨在通过减少糖尿病患者的注射次数来简化治疗管理。ONWARDS临床开发项目对icodec的疗效和安全性进行了评估。本研究从意大利国家医疗保健系统(NHS)的角度评估了 icodec 对经济和生活质量的影响:我们开展了一项药物经济学研究,以评估每周一次的胰岛素 icodec 的价值,突出其在减少针头使用量的同时提高依从性和生活质量的潜力。在基础病例中,与每日一次的德格鲁德胰岛素相比,进行了为期一年的差异成本和成本效用分析。在与degludec比较的基础上,计划对icodec和市场上现有的基础胰岛素组合进行情景分析。经济评估包括药物和管理成本、针头和对依从性的影响。成本效用分析衡量了每周注射与每天注射的效用,得出了增量成本效益比(ICER),单位为Δ€/ΔQALY(质量调整生命年)。为评估结果的稳健性,进行了确定性单向敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析:考虑到减少针头使用(-51.10 欧元)和改善依从性(-54.85 欧元)所带来的经济效益,icodec 每周一次的年成本比 degludec 高 25%,但不增加成本,甚至可能为每位患者节省费用。此外,icodec 还具有效用优势(0.023)。与 degludec 相比,icodec 的增量成本效益比(ICER)占优势。与基础胰岛素组合的比较也显示出成本效益。进行的敏感性测试证实了研究结果的稳健性,突出了分析的关键驱动因素:结论:Icodec 是简化基础胰岛素治疗的新疗法。结论:Icodec 是一种简化基础胰岛素治疗的新疗法,它还能改善患者的管理和生活质量,同时不会增加意大利国家医疗服务体系的经济负担,并能保证极高的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Service Satisfaction and Sustainability of the Afya Health Insurance Scheme in Kuwait: An Exploratory Analysis [Response to Letter]. Characteristics of High-Cost Beneficiaries of Prescription Drugs in Kazakhstan: A Cross-Sectional Study of Outpatient Data from 2022. Cost Analysis of Thromboprophylaxis in Patients at High Thromboembolic Risk with Enoxaparin, Dalteparin and Nadroparin in Colombia: A Systematic Literature Review-Based Study. Economic Evaluation of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec from Italian NHS Perspective. Cost-Utility of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes in Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1