A Two-Step Q-Matrix Estimation Method.

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1177/01466216241284418
Hans-Friedrich Köhn, Chia-Yi Chiu, Olasumbo Oluwalana, Hyunjoo Kim, Jiaxi Wang
{"title":"A Two-Step Q-Matrix Estimation Method.","authors":"Hans-Friedrich Köhn, Chia-Yi Chiu, Olasumbo Oluwalana, Hyunjoo Kim, Jiaxi Wang","doi":"10.1177/01466216241284418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive Diagnosis Models in educational measurement are restricted latent class models that describe ability in a knowledge domain as a composite of latent skills an examinee may have mastered or failed. Different combinations of skills define distinct latent proficiency classes to which examinees are assigned based on test performance. Items of cognitively diagnostic assessments are characterized by skill profiles specifying which skills are required for a correct item response. The item-skill profiles of a test form its Q-matrix. The validity of cognitive diagnosis depends crucially on the correct specification of the Q-matrix. Typically, Q-matrices are determined by curricular experts. However, expert judgment is fallible. Data-driven estimation methods have been developed with the promise of greater accuracy in identifying the Q-matrix of a test. Yet, many of the extant methods encounter computational feasibility issues either in the form of excessive amounts of CPU times or inadmissible estimates. In this article, a two-step algorithm for estimating the Q-matrix is proposed that can be used with any cognitive diagnosis model. Simulations showed that the new method outperformed extant estimation algorithms and was computationally more efficient. It was also applied to Tatsuoka's famous fraction-subtraction data. The paper concludes with a discussion of theoretical and practical implications of the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"01466216241284418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216241284418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive Diagnosis Models in educational measurement are restricted latent class models that describe ability in a knowledge domain as a composite of latent skills an examinee may have mastered or failed. Different combinations of skills define distinct latent proficiency classes to which examinees are assigned based on test performance. Items of cognitively diagnostic assessments are characterized by skill profiles specifying which skills are required for a correct item response. The item-skill profiles of a test form its Q-matrix. The validity of cognitive diagnosis depends crucially on the correct specification of the Q-matrix. Typically, Q-matrices are determined by curricular experts. However, expert judgment is fallible. Data-driven estimation methods have been developed with the promise of greater accuracy in identifying the Q-matrix of a test. Yet, many of the extant methods encounter computational feasibility issues either in the form of excessive amounts of CPU times or inadmissible estimates. In this article, a two-step algorithm for estimating the Q-matrix is proposed that can be used with any cognitive diagnosis model. Simulations showed that the new method outperformed extant estimation algorithms and was computationally more efficient. It was also applied to Tatsuoka's famous fraction-subtraction data. The paper concludes with a discussion of theoretical and practical implications of the findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两步 Q 矩阵估算法
教育测量中的认知诊断模型是一种有限制的潜类模型,它将某一知识领域的能力描述为受测者可能已掌握或未掌握的潜技能的组合。不同的技能组合定义了不同的潜在能力等级,受测者根据测试成绩被分配到不同的等级。认知诊断式测评的项目是以技能描述为特征的,具体说明正确的项目回答需要哪些技能。测验的项目-技能特征构成了测验的 Q 矩阵。认知诊断的有效性在很大程度上取决于 Q 矩阵的规格是否正确。Q 矩阵通常由课程专家确定。然而,专家的判断是不可靠的。数据驱动的估算方法应运而生,有望更准确地确定测试的 Q 矩阵。然而,许多现存方法都遇到了计算可行性问题,要么需要耗费过多的 CPU 时间,要么估算结果不可接受。本文提出了一种估算 Q 矩阵的两步算法,可用于任何认知诊断模型。模拟结果表明,新方法的性能优于现有的估计算法,而且计算效率更高。该方法还被应用于 Tatsuoka 著名的分数减法数据。论文最后讨论了研究结果的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Differential Item Functioning on Computer Adaptive Testing Under Different Conditions. Evaluating the Construct Validity of Instructional Manipulation Checks as Measures of Careless Responding to Surveys. A Mark-Recapture Approach to Estimating Item Pool Compromise. Estimating Test-Retest Reliability in the Presence of Self-Selection Bias and Learning/Practice Effects. The Improved EMS Algorithm for Latent Variable Selection in M3PL Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1