Non-serious adverse events in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving etrasimod: an analysis of the phase II OASIS and phase III ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 clinical trials.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-11-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241293643
Charlie W Lees, Joana Torres, Yvette Leung, Séverine Vermeire, Marc Fellmann, Irene Modesto, Aoibhinn McDonnell, Krisztina Lazin, Michael Keating, Martina Goetsch, Joseph Wu, Edward V Loftus
{"title":"Non-serious adverse events in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving etrasimod: an analysis of the phase II OASIS and phase III ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 clinical trials.","authors":"Charlie W Lees, Joana Torres, Yvette Leung, Séverine Vermeire, Marc Fellmann, Irene Modesto, Aoibhinn McDonnell, Krisztina Lazin, Michael Keating, Martina Goetsch, Joseph Wu, Edward V Loftus","doi":"10.1177/17562848241293643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)<sub>1,4,5</sub> receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). It is known that non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) may not lead to UC drug discontinuation but can affect treatment tolerability.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This post hoc analysis evaluated the incidence of specific, common, non-serious TEAEs reported in the etrasimod UC clinical programme and the characteristics of affected patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data included patients from the Placebo-controlled UC cohort (phase II OASIS, and phase III ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials) receiving QD etrasimod (2 or 1 mg) or placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; the number of patients with a TEAE divided by the total exposure in patient-years (PYs), per 100 PY) of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness TEAEs were reported. Changes in heart rate among patients with Dizziness TEAEs were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 943 patients (etrasimod 2 mg, <i>N</i> = 577 (276.7 PY); etrasimod 1 mg, <i>N</i> = 52 (11.4 PY); placebo, <i>N</i> = 314 (115.1 PY)), 48, 34, 27 and 21 patients experienced events of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness, respectively. All events were non-serious; one patient treated with etrasimod was discontinued due to a Pyrexia TEAE. Numerically, IRs of Headache and Dizziness TEAEs were higher, and Nausea slightly higher, with etrasimod versus placebo (13.45 vs 8.63 per 100 PY, 6.52 vs 1.69 and 7.18 vs 5.13 per 100 PY, respectively); IRs were similar for Pyrexia. The duration of most TEAEs was 1-10 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the etrasimod UC clinical programme, all Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness events were non-serious. Headache and Dizziness were more frequent, and Nausea slightly more frequent, among patients receiving etrasimod versus placebo. The post hoc nature of this analysis is a limitation. These results reiterate the favourable safety profile and tolerability of etrasimod.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02447302; NCT03945188; NCT03996369.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562848241293643"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241293643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). It is known that non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) may not lead to UC drug discontinuation but can affect treatment tolerability.

Objectives: This post hoc analysis evaluated the incidence of specific, common, non-serious TEAEs reported in the etrasimod UC clinical programme and the characteristics of affected patients.

Design: Data included patients from the Placebo-controlled UC cohort (phase II OASIS, and phase III ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials) receiving QD etrasimod (2 or 1 mg) or placebo.

Methods: Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; the number of patients with a TEAE divided by the total exposure in patient-years (PYs), per 100 PY) of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness TEAEs were reported. Changes in heart rate among patients with Dizziness TEAEs were also evaluated.

Results: Among 943 patients (etrasimod 2 mg, N = 577 (276.7 PY); etrasimod 1 mg, N = 52 (11.4 PY); placebo, N = 314 (115.1 PY)), 48, 34, 27 and 21 patients experienced events of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness, respectively. All events were non-serious; one patient treated with etrasimod was discontinued due to a Pyrexia TEAE. Numerically, IRs of Headache and Dizziness TEAEs were higher, and Nausea slightly higher, with etrasimod versus placebo (13.45 vs 8.63 per 100 PY, 6.52 vs 1.69 and 7.18 vs 5.13 per 100 PY, respectively); IRs were similar for Pyrexia. The duration of most TEAEs was 1-10 days.

Conclusion: In the etrasimod UC clinical programme, all Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness events were non-serious. Headache and Dizziness were more frequent, and Nausea slightly more frequent, among patients receiving etrasimod versus placebo. The post hoc nature of this analysis is a limitation. These results reiterate the favourable safety profile and tolerability of etrasimod.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02447302; NCT03945188; NCT03996369.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受依曲莫德治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者的非严重不良事件:对 II 期 OASIS 和 III 期 ELEVATE UC 52 和 ELEVATE UC 12 临床试验的分析。
研究背景Etrasimod是一种口服、每日一次(QD)的选择性1-磷酸鞘磷脂(S1P)1,4,5受体调节剂,用于治疗中度至重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)。众所周知,非严重的治疗突发不良事件(TEAEs)可能不会导致 UC 停药,但会影响治疗耐受性:这项事后分析评估了依曲莫德 UC 临床项目中报告的特定、常见、非严重 TEAE 的发生率以及受影响患者的特征:数据包括安慰剂对照 UC 队列(II 期 OASIS、III 期 ELEVATE UC 52 和 ELEVATE UC 12 试验)中接受 QD etrasimod(2 或 1 毫克)或安慰剂治疗的患者:报告了头痛、发热、恶心和头晕 TEAEs 的比例和发生率(IRs;每 100 个患者年中发生 TEAE 的患者人数除以患者年(PYs)的总暴露量)。此外,还评估了头晕 TEAEs 患者的心率变化:在943名患者(依拉西莫德2毫克,577人(276.7PY);依拉西莫德1毫克,52人(11.4PY);安慰剂,314人(115.1PY))中,分别有48、34、27和21名患者出现头痛、发热、恶心和头晕事件。所有事件均不严重;一名接受依曲莫德治疗的患者因 "热痛 "TEAE而停药。从数字上看,依拉西莫德与安慰剂相比,头痛和头晕TEAE的IR值更高,恶心的IR值略高(分别为13.45 vs 8.63/100PY、6.52 vs 1.69和7.18 vs 5.13/100PY);发热TEAE的IR值相似。大多数 TEAEs 的持续时间为 1-10 天:结论:在依曲莫德 UC 临床项目中,所有头痛、热痛、恶心和头晕事件均不严重。与安慰剂相比,接受依曲莫德治疗的患者头痛和头晕的发生率更高,恶心的发生率略高。这项分析的事后分析性质是一个局限。这些结果重申了依曲莫德良好的安全性和耐受性:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02447302;NCT03945188;NCT03996369。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Innovative approaches in colorectal cancer screening: advances in detection methods and the role of artificial intelligence. The efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan and Tegoprazan in Helicobacter pylori eradication: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Utility of modified endoscopic radial incision and selective cutting combined with short-term stenting for refractory stricture in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal carcinoma. Pouchitis unveiled: exploring clinical features, diagnosis, and cutting-edge treatments. Association between alkaline phosphatase levels and mortality in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1