Cheng Wang, Linda Irons, Holly Kimko, Dhaval K Shah
{"title":"Meta-Analysis of Exposure-Adverse Event Relationships for Antibody-Drug Conjugates.","authors":"Cheng Wang, Linda Irons, Holly Kimko, Dhaval K Shah","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have become a vital class of therapeutics in oncology because of their ability to selectively deliver potent drug molecules to tumor cells. However, ADC-associated toxicities cause high failure rates in the clinic and hinder their full potential. Due to the complex structure and pharmacokinetics of ADCs, it is challenging to identify the drivers of their toxicities. Here, quantitative analysis was performed to correlate the incidence of clinical adverse events (AEs) with nine different commonly measured exposure parameters collected from study-level summary data. We considered ADC analytes for different classes of ADCs, to identify ADC analytes that are strongly associated with the AEs for ADCs. Published clinical exposure and safety data for any grade and grade ≥3 AEs from 40 publications across six ADCs and three payloads were collected and analyzed. Exposure-AE relationships were quantified using logit models, and the strength of the correlations and rank order were determined. The analysis suggests that deruxtecan ADC-related toxicities correlated most strongly with the exposure of the free payload; monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) ADC-related toxicities correlated with the free MMAE area under the curve; and pyrrolobenzodiazepine ADC-related toxicities correlated with no specific analyte but the dose. These findings agree with the published literature and support the notion that AE profiles are often shared by ADCs that deliver the same cytotoxic payload. The exposure-AE relationships presented here, together with identification of the most informative ADC analytes, may facilitate more focused mechanistic studies on the drivers of clinical AEs and could support dosing decisions during clinical development of ADCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.6160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have become a vital class of therapeutics in oncology because of their ability to selectively deliver potent drug molecules to tumor cells. However, ADC-associated toxicities cause high failure rates in the clinic and hinder their full potential. Due to the complex structure and pharmacokinetics of ADCs, it is challenging to identify the drivers of their toxicities. Here, quantitative analysis was performed to correlate the incidence of clinical adverse events (AEs) with nine different commonly measured exposure parameters collected from study-level summary data. We considered ADC analytes for different classes of ADCs, to identify ADC analytes that are strongly associated with the AEs for ADCs. Published clinical exposure and safety data for any grade and grade ≥3 AEs from 40 publications across six ADCs and three payloads were collected and analyzed. Exposure-AE relationships were quantified using logit models, and the strength of the correlations and rank order were determined. The analysis suggests that deruxtecan ADC-related toxicities correlated most strongly with the exposure of the free payload; monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) ADC-related toxicities correlated with the free MMAE area under the curve; and pyrrolobenzodiazepine ADC-related toxicities correlated with no specific analyte but the dose. These findings agree with the published literature and support the notion that AE profiles are often shared by ADCs that deliver the same cytotoxic payload. The exposure-AE relationships presented here, together with identification of the most informative ADC analytes, may facilitate more focused mechanistic studies on the drivers of clinical AEs and could support dosing decisions during clinical development of ADCs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.