A Digital Self-Administered Check-Up Assessment and Evaluation of Risk Communication in Older People

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International Journal of Older People Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1111/opn.12667
Connie Schumacher, Grace Pyatt, Fabrice Mowbray, Aaron Jones, Dawn Prentice, Andrew Costa
{"title":"A Digital Self-Administered Check-Up Assessment and Evaluation of Risk Communication in Older People","authors":"Connie Schumacher,&nbsp;Grace Pyatt,&nbsp;Fabrice Mowbray,&nbsp;Aaron Jones,&nbsp;Dawn Prentice,&nbsp;Andrew Costa","doi":"10.1111/opn.12667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Digital health tools can significantly contribute to the continuum of care and support for persons with their self-management role. Despite the increasing adoption of digital health tools, little is known about the uptake and comfort of use among older persons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A mixed methods design was used to assess the feasibility and utility of the check-up (CU), a self-administered digital health assessment for older persons. For the older person, qualitative interviews and de-identified CU assessment data were collected. A focus group was held to gain the health provider perspective.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 32 online CU assessments were completed, and 17 individuals participated in interviews. Three main themes were identified: digital literacy and accessibility, communication of risk and role within the circle of care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Self-administered digital assessments are feasible for older adults. Strategies for adoption should focus on accessibility and collaboration with health professionals to maximise utility and understanding of assessment results.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48651,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","volume":"19 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/opn.12667","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.12667","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Digital health tools can significantly contribute to the continuum of care and support for persons with their self-management role. Despite the increasing adoption of digital health tools, little is known about the uptake and comfort of use among older persons.

Methods

A mixed methods design was used to assess the feasibility and utility of the check-up (CU), a self-administered digital health assessment for older persons. For the older person, qualitative interviews and de-identified CU assessment data were collected. A focus group was held to gain the health provider perspective.

Results

A total of 32 online CU assessments were completed, and 17 individuals participated in interviews. Three main themes were identified: digital literacy and accessibility, communication of risk and role within the circle of care.

Conclusion

Self-administered digital assessments are feasible for older adults. Strategies for adoption should focus on accessibility and collaboration with health professionals to maximise utility and understanding of assessment results.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人风险交流的数字自控体检评估和评价。
背景:数字健康工具可以极大地促进持续护理,并支持老年人发挥自我管理的作用。尽管数字健康工具的采用率越来越高,但人们对老年人的接受程度和使用舒适度却知之甚少:方法:采用混合方法设计,评估老年人自我管理数字健康评估工具 "体检"(CU)的可行性和实用性。针对老年人,收集了定性访谈和去标识化的 CU 评估数据。此外,还举行了一次焦点小组会议,以了解医疗服务提供者的观点:共完成了 32 项在线 CU 评估,17 人参加了访谈。确定了三大主题:数字扫盲和可及性、风险沟通和在护理圈中的角色:结论:自我管理的数字评估对老年人来说是可行的。采用策略应侧重于可访问性和与医疗专业人员的合作,以最大限度地提高实用性和对评估结果的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: International Journal of Older People Nursing welcomes scholarly papers on all aspects of older people nursing including research, practice, education, management, and policy. We publish manuscripts that further scholarly inquiry and improve practice through innovation and creativity in all aspects of gerontological nursing. We encourage submission of integrative and systematic reviews; original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; secondary analyses of existing data; historical works; theoretical and conceptual analyses; evidence based practice projects and other practice improvement reports; and policy analyses. All submissions must reflect consideration of IJOPN''s international readership and include explicit perspective on gerontological nursing. We particularly welcome submissions from regions of the world underrepresented in the gerontological nursing literature and from settings and situations not typically addressed in that literature. Editorial perspectives are published in each issue. Editorial perspectives are submitted by invitation only.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitudes and Confidence in Providing Dementia Care to Older Adults Among Nurses Practicing in Hanoi, Vietnam: A Cross-Sectional Study A Digital Self-Administered Check-Up Assessment and Evaluation of Risk Communication in Older People Implementation and Impact of a Lifting Cushion for Care Home Residents Who Have Fallen Exploring Older People's Experiences and Factors Associated With 30-Day Hospital Readmission: A Qualitative Study Using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Re)conceptualising Good Care in Hospital Settings From the Perspectives of Older Persons: A Concept Analysis Using Pragmatic Utility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1