Effects of an Emergency-Based FASE Strategy on Treating Geriatric Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S485809
Jun Zhou, Liu Shi, Chuwei Tian, Yucheng Gao, Jinyu Wang, Jin Mao, Yan Li, Wenbin Fan, Xiangxu Chen, Cheng Zhang, Tian Xie, Yunfeng Rui
{"title":"Effects of an Emergency-Based FASE Strategy on Treating Geriatric Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.","authors":"Jun Zhou, Liu Shi, Chuwei Tian, Yucheng Gao, Jinyu Wang, Jin Mao, Yan Li, Wenbin Fan, Xiangxu Chen, Cheng Zhang, Tian Xie, Yunfeng Rui","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S485809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to assess the impacts of the Fast Access to Surgery in Emergency (FASE) strategy on (1) the workflow of multidisciplinary team (MDT) during hospitalization; (2) the clinical outcomes of geriatric femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted in a single trauma center to evaluate the clinical data of geriatric FNF patients admitted through emergency from July 2017 to June 2022. The FASE strategy was implemented since Jan 1st 2020, and patients were categorized into the FASE group or the control group according to the time of admission (before/after the initiation timepoint of FASE strategy). Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to limit confounding bias between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, 344 patients were included after a one-to-one matching. The FASE strategy resulted in a slightly prolonged duration in emergency (6.02±5.99 h vs 2.72±4.22 h, p<0.001) but was meanwhile associated with significant decreases in time to surgery (61.16±38.74 h vs 92.02±82.80 h, p<0.001), actual surgery delay (67.18±39.04 h vs. 94.25±84.41 h, p<0.001) and total length of hospital stay (10.57±4.93 h vs 12.50±4.73 h, p <0.001). Besides, despite the consistency of transfusion rate between the two groups, improved blood management was achieved in the FASE group, as evidenced by a smaller drop in hemoglobin levels (-20.49±17.02 g/L vs -25.28±16.33 g/L, p = 0.013) in patients without preoperative or intraoperative transfusion. However, no significant differences were observed regarding the overall clinical outcomes such as mortality or postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Fast Access to Surgery in Emergency (FASE) for geriatric FNF patients effectively optimized the preoperative evaluation workflow, which significantly shortened time to surgery and length of hospital stay, and reduced perioperative blood loss. FASE strategy improved the surgical workflows and turnover efficiency of geriatric FNF patients, therefore could play an important role in the optimal MDT co-management for geriatric FNF patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"19 ","pages":"1867-1880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S485809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to assess the impacts of the Fast Access to Surgery in Emergency (FASE) strategy on (1) the workflow of multidisciplinary team (MDT) during hospitalization; (2) the clinical outcomes of geriatric femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a single trauma center to evaluate the clinical data of geriatric FNF patients admitted through emergency from July 2017 to June 2022. The FASE strategy was implemented since Jan 1st 2020, and patients were categorized into the FASE group or the control group according to the time of admission (before/after the initiation timepoint of FASE strategy). Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to limit confounding bias between the two groups.

Results: Finally, 344 patients were included after a one-to-one matching. The FASE strategy resulted in a slightly prolonged duration in emergency (6.02±5.99 h vs 2.72±4.22 h, p<0.001) but was meanwhile associated with significant decreases in time to surgery (61.16±38.74 h vs 92.02±82.80 h, p<0.001), actual surgery delay (67.18±39.04 h vs. 94.25±84.41 h, p<0.001) and total length of hospital stay (10.57±4.93 h vs 12.50±4.73 h, p <0.001). Besides, despite the consistency of transfusion rate between the two groups, improved blood management was achieved in the FASE group, as evidenced by a smaller drop in hemoglobin levels (-20.49±17.02 g/L vs -25.28±16.33 g/L, p = 0.013) in patients without preoperative or intraoperative transfusion. However, no significant differences were observed regarding the overall clinical outcomes such as mortality or postoperative complications.

Conclusion: The Fast Access to Surgery in Emergency (FASE) for geriatric FNF patients effectively optimized the preoperative evaluation workflow, which significantly shortened time to surgery and length of hospital stay, and reduced perioperative blood loss. FASE strategy improved the surgical workflows and turnover efficiency of geriatric FNF patients, therefore could play an important role in the optimal MDT co-management for geriatric FNF patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以急诊为基础的 FASE 策略对老年股骨颈骨折患者的治疗效果:倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究。
导言:本研究旨在评估急诊快速手术(FASE)策略对(1)住院期间多学科团队(MDT)工作流程;(2)老年股骨颈骨折(FNF)患者临床预后的影响:在一家创伤中心开展了一项回顾性研究,评估2017年7月至2022年6月期间急诊收治的老年股骨颈骨折患者的临床数据。FASE 策略自 2020 年 1 月 1 日起实施,根据入院时间(FASE 策略启动时间点之前/之后)将患者分为 FASE 组和对照组。采用倾向得分匹配法(PSM)限制两组间的混杂偏差:结果:经过一对一匹配,最终纳入了 344 名患者。FASE 策略导致急诊时间略有延长(6.02±5.99 h vs 2.72±4.22 h,p):针对老年 FNF 患者的急诊手术快速通道(FASE)有效优化了术前评估工作流程,显著缩短了手术时间和住院时间,减少了围术期失血。FASE 策略改善了老年 FNF 患者的手术工作流程和周转效率,因此可在老年 FNF 患者的最佳 MDT 共同管理中发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the Clinical Implications of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Neuroglobin in Ischemic Stroke [Response to Letter]. A Commentary on "A Comparison Between Two Different Definitions of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury for Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Coronary Angiography" [Letter]. Addressing Limitations and Future Directions in Assessing Risk Factors for Pulmonary Complications after Femur Fracture Surgery in Elderly Patients [Response to Letter]. Assessing the Role of VISTA in Vascular Cognitive Impairment: Addressing Limitations and Exploring Future Research Directions [Letter]. Characteristics of Mortality After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1