Securing the Future: Financial Ties of Thoracic Surgery Program Directors to Industry.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.005
Richard Nudotor, Jinny S Ha, Jessica M Ruck, Hamza Aziz, Ahmet Kilic, Errol L Bush
{"title":"Securing the Future: Financial Ties of Thoracic Surgery Program Directors to Industry.","authors":"Richard Nudotor, Jinny S Ha, Jessica M Ruck, Hamza Aziz, Ahmet Kilic, Errol L Bush","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Thoracic surgery program directors (PDs) are key mentors for the next generation of cardiothoracic surgeons and surgeon-scientists. This study evaluates the industry payments to PDs compared to other practicing thoracic surgeons to assess potential conflicts of interest and their influence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PDs were identified using the Electronic residency application system (ERAS) and their National provider identifiers (NPIs). Industry payments from 2015 to 2021 were extracted from the OpenPayments (cms.gov) database. We analyzed the number and types of payments, including consulting fees, speaking engagements, and research-related contributions. Payments were compared by PD characteristics such as gender, specialty, and academic metrics using the Chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 77 identified PDs (66 males and 11 females) received industry payments, totaling $14,094,422 across 8,028 transactions. The median payment was $16716, with maximum reaching $2,661,001. Male PDs and those in cardiac specialties received significantly higher payments. Research funding for PDs was predominantly awarded to males (100%). Significant disparities were observed in industry payments to PDs compared to non-PDs, especially in food and beverage, and educational activities. PDs initially received more than double the research payments compared to non-PDs in the early years. This disparity reduced significantly by 2021, reflecting a move towards more equitable research funding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The substantial payment to PDs reflects their significant role in thoracic surgery, yet raises concerns regarding potential influence on trainees. These findings underscore the need for increased transparency and measures to address disparities in industry support, particularly concerning gender and specialty.</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Thoracic surgery program directors (PDs) are key mentors for the next generation of cardiothoracic surgeons and surgeon-scientists. This study evaluates the industry payments to PDs compared to other practicing thoracic surgeons to assess potential conflicts of interest and their influence.

Methods: PDs were identified using the Electronic residency application system (ERAS) and their National provider identifiers (NPIs). Industry payments from 2015 to 2021 were extracted from the OpenPayments (cms.gov) database. We analyzed the number and types of payments, including consulting fees, speaking engagements, and research-related contributions. Payments were compared by PD characteristics such as gender, specialty, and academic metrics using the Chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: All 77 identified PDs (66 males and 11 females) received industry payments, totaling $14,094,422 across 8,028 transactions. The median payment was $16716, with maximum reaching $2,661,001. Male PDs and those in cardiac specialties received significantly higher payments. Research funding for PDs was predominantly awarded to males (100%). Significant disparities were observed in industry payments to PDs compared to non-PDs, especially in food and beverage, and educational activities. PDs initially received more than double the research payments compared to non-PDs in the early years. This disparity reduced significantly by 2021, reflecting a move towards more equitable research funding.

Conclusion: The substantial payment to PDs reflects their significant role in thoracic surgery, yet raises concerns regarding potential influence on trainees. These findings underscore the need for increased transparency and measures to address disparities in industry support, particularly concerning gender and specialty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确保未来:胸外科项目主任与行业的财务联系。
目的:胸外科项目主任 (PD) 是下一代心胸外科医生和外科医生科学家的重要导师。本研究评估了与其他执业胸外科医生相比,胸外科项目主任的行业报酬,以评估潜在的利益冲突及其影响:方法:使用电子住院医师申请系统 (ERAS) 及其国家提供者标识符 (NPI) 识别住院医师。从 OpenPayments (cms.gov) 数据库中提取了 2015 年至 2021 年的行业付款。我们分析了付款的数量和类型,包括咨询费、演讲活动和研究相关贡献。我们使用Chi-square检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验比较了PD的性别、专业和学术指标等特征:所有 77 名已确认的 PD(66 名男性和 11 名女性)都收到了行业付款,总额达 14,094,422 美元,涉及 8,028 笔交易。付款中位数为 16716 美元,最高达 2,661,001 美元。男性和心脏专科的博士获得的报酬明显更高。博士的研究经费主要由男性获得(100%)。与非专科医师相比,专科医师获得的行业报酬存在显著差异,尤其是在餐饮和教育活动方面。在最初几年,专业人员获得的研究经费是非专业人员的两倍多。到 2021 年,这一差距明显缩小,反映出研究经费正朝着更加公平的方向发展:结论:向胸外科医生支付巨额研究经费反映了他们在胸外科中的重要作用,但也引发了对受训者潜在影响的担忧。这些发现强调了提高透明度和采取措施解决行业支持差异的必要性,尤其是在性别和专业方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
期刊最新文献
Commentary: Two Arteries Walk into a CABG… Is it Better the Second Time Around? Multi-Institutional Model to Predict Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay after Cardiac Surgery. Textbook Outcome after Robotic and Laparoscopic Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy is Associated with Improved Survival - A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. The Importance of Affinity: Organizational Conferences Support the Diversity Needed in Our Specialty. Commentator Discussion: Reverse double switch operation for the borderline left ventricle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1