Relationship Between Race, Predelivery Cardiology Care and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Pre-Eclampsia/Eclampsia Among a Commercially Insured Population.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011643
Ikeoluwapo Kendra Bolakale-Rufai, Shannon M Knapp, Brownsyne Tucker-Edmonds, Sadiya Khan, LaPrincess C Brewer, Selma Mohammed, Amber E Johnson, Sula Mazimba, Daniel Addison, Khadijah Breathett
{"title":"Relationship Between Race, Predelivery Cardiology Care and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Pre-Eclampsia/Eclampsia Among a Commercially Insured Population.","authors":"Ikeoluwapo Kendra Bolakale-Rufai, Shannon M Knapp, Brownsyne Tucker-Edmonds, Sadiya Khan, LaPrincess C Brewer, Selma Mohammed, Amber E Johnson, Sula Mazimba, Daniel Addison, Khadijah Breathett","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> It is unknown whether predelivery cardiology care is associated with future risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in Preeclampsia/Eclampsia (PrE/E). We sought to determine the cumulative incidence of MACE by race and whether predelivery cardiology care was associated with the hazard of MACE up to 1-year post-delivery for Black and White patients with PrE/E. <b>Methods:</b> Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database, we identified Black and White patients with PrE/E who had a delivery between 2008 and 2019. MACE was defined as the composite of heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Cumulative incidence functions were used to compare incidence of MACE by race. Regression models were used to assess hazard of MACE by cardiology care for each race. Separate hazards were calculated for the first 14 days and the remainder of the year. <b>Results:</b> Among 29,336 patients (83.4% White, 16.6% Black, 99.5% commercially insured, mean age 30.9 years) with PrE/E, 11.2% received cardiology care (10.9% White, 13.0% Black). Black patients had higher incidence of MACE than White patients at 1-yr post-delivery (2.7% vs 1.4%) with the majority within 14 days of delivery (Black: 58.7%; White: 67.8%). After adjusting for age and comorbidities, receipt of cardiology care was associated with lower hazard of MACE for White patients within 14 days following delivery (HR 0.31, 95%CI: 0.21-0.46, p<0.001) but not Black patients (HR 1.00, 95%CI: 0.60-1.67; p= 0.999). The effect of the interaction between race and cardiology care was significant in the first 14 days (p<0.001) but not the remainder of the year (p=0.56). <b>Conclusions:</b> Among a well-insured population of patients with PrE/E, Black patients had a higher cumulative incidence of MACE up to a year post-delivery. Cardiology care was associated with a lower hazard of MACE only for White patients during the first 14 days following delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is unknown whether predelivery cardiology care is associated with future risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in Preeclampsia/Eclampsia (PrE/E). We sought to determine the cumulative incidence of MACE by race and whether predelivery cardiology care was associated with the hazard of MACE up to 1-year post-delivery for Black and White patients with PrE/E. Methods: Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database, we identified Black and White patients with PrE/E who had a delivery between 2008 and 2019. MACE was defined as the composite of heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Cumulative incidence functions were used to compare incidence of MACE by race. Regression models were used to assess hazard of MACE by cardiology care for each race. Separate hazards were calculated for the first 14 days and the remainder of the year. Results: Among 29,336 patients (83.4% White, 16.6% Black, 99.5% commercially insured, mean age 30.9 years) with PrE/E, 11.2% received cardiology care (10.9% White, 13.0% Black). Black patients had higher incidence of MACE than White patients at 1-yr post-delivery (2.7% vs 1.4%) with the majority within 14 days of delivery (Black: 58.7%; White: 67.8%). After adjusting for age and comorbidities, receipt of cardiology care was associated with lower hazard of MACE for White patients within 14 days following delivery (HR 0.31, 95%CI: 0.21-0.46, p<0.001) but not Black patients (HR 1.00, 95%CI: 0.60-1.67; p= 0.999). The effect of the interaction between race and cardiology care was significant in the first 14 days (p<0.001) but not the remainder of the year (p=0.56). Conclusions: Among a well-insured population of patients with PrE/E, Black patients had a higher cumulative incidence of MACE up to a year post-delivery. Cardiology care was associated with a lower hazard of MACE only for White patients during the first 14 days following delivery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商业保险人群中子痫前期/子痫患者的种族、产前心脏病护理与心血管结果之间的关系。
背景:目前尚不清楚产前心脏病治疗是否与先兆子痫/子痫(PrE/E)患者未来发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的风险有关。我们试图确定不同种族的 MACE 累积发生率,以及黑人和白人 PrE/E 患者的产前心脏病治疗是否与产后一年内的 MACE 风险相关。方法:利用 Optum 的去标识化 Clinformatics® Data Mart 数据库,我们确定了在 2008 年至 2019 年期间分娩的黑人和白人 PrE/E 患者。MACE定义为心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死、中风和死亡的综合。累积发生率函数用于比较不同种族的 MACE 发生率。回归模型用于评估每个种族的心脏病护理对 MACE 的危害。分别计算了前 14 天和一年中剩余时间的危害。结果:在 29,336 名 PrE/E 患者(83.4% 为白人,16.6% 为黑人,99.5% 有商业保险,平均年龄为 30.9 岁)中,11.2% 接受了心脏病治疗(10.9% 为白人,13.0% 为黑人)。黑人患者在产后 1 年的 MACE 发生率高于白人患者(2.7% 对 1.4%),其中大部分发生在产后 14 天内(黑人:58.7%;白人:67.8%)。在对年龄和合并症进行调整后,接受心脏病治疗与白人患者在产后14天内发生MACE的风险较低有关(HR 0.31,95%CI:0.21-0.46,p结论:在有良好保险的 PrE/E 患者群体中,黑人患者在产后一年内的 MACE 累积发生率较高。只有白人患者在产后头 14 天内接受心脏病治疗与降低 MACE 风险有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
期刊最新文献
Patient Preferences for Features Associated With Leadless Versus Conventional Transvenous Cardiac Pacemakers. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and the Risk of Heart Failure Hospitalizations Among Individuals With Coronary Artery Disease. Artificial Intelligence Applications for Electrocardiography to Define New Digital Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Risk. Prognostic Significance and Associations of Neural Network-Derived Electrocardiographic Features. The Role of Primary Care in Achieving Life's Essential 8: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1