Accuracy of different maxillomandibular relationship recording techniques in the edentulous maxillary arch.

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the effect of three digital bite registration techniques on the accuracy of intraoral scanning in maxillary edentulous and mandibular dentate arches.

Materials and methods: Maxillary edentulous and mandible fully dentate models were created. Four dental implants were placed in the maxilla, fitted with scan bodies, and reference scans were obtained using a Nikon Altera 10.7.6 scanner. Digital impressions were acquired 10 times for each model using a Trios 4 intraoral scanner. Three different digital bite records were collected for each pair of mandible and maxilla scans. The first one was a bite record without additional material (WSB), the second utilized a silicone index between the models (WSB silicone), and the third followed a pre-preparation scanning protocol (Pre-PREP). The data was exported in standard tessellation language (STL) format, which was assessed for trueness and precision using statistical analysis.

Results: According to mean trueness values, WSB exhibited the lowest value, 173 µm, followed by WSB silicone 242 µm and Pre-PREP 620 µm. The differences were significant only when comparing Pre-PREP to WSB and Pre-PREP to WSB silicone (p < 0.05). Regarding precision, WSB demonstrated a mean value of 171.5 µm, followed by WSB silicone with 213.8 µm, and Pre-PREP with 222.2 µm with no significant difference between the groups.

Conclusion: The presence of interarch bite registration material adversely affected interocclusal record accuracy, while WSB silicone presented a suitable substitute for WSB.