Revisiting the functional monitoring of brain development in premature neonates. A new direction in clinical care and research.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.siny.2024.101556
Fabrice Wallois, Sahar Moghimi
{"title":"Revisiting the functional monitoring of brain development in premature neonates. A new direction in clinical care and research.","authors":"Fabrice Wallois, Sahar Moghimi","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2024.101556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The first 1000 days of life are of paramount importance for neonatal development. Premature newborns are exposed early to the external environment, modifying the fetal exposome and leading to overexposure in some sensory domains and deprivation in others. The resulting neurodevelopmental effects may persist throughout the individual's lifetime. Several neonatal neuromonitoring techniques can be used to investigate neural mechanisms in early postnatal development. EEG is the most widely used, as it is easy to perform, even at the patient's bedside. It is not expensive and provides information with a high temporal resolution and relatively good spatial resolution when performed in high-density mode. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a technique for monitoring vascular network dynamics, can also be used at the patient's bedside. It is not expensive and has a good spatial resolution at the cortical surface. These two techniques can be combined for simultaneous monitoring of the neuronal and vascular networks in premature newborns, providing insight into neurodevelopment before term. However, the extent to which more general conclusions about fetal development can be drawn from findings for premature neonates remains unclear due to considerable differences in environmental and medical situations. Fetal MEG (fMEG, as an alternative to EEG for preterm infants) and fMRI (as an alternative to fNIRS for preterm infants) can also be used to investigate fetal neurodevelopment on a trimester-specific basis. These techniques should be used for validation purposes as they are the only tools available for evaluating neuronal dysfunction in the fetus at the time of the gene-environment interactions influencing transient neuronal progenitor populations in brain structures. But what do these techniques tell us about early neurodevelopment? We address this question here, from two points of view. We first discuss spontaneous neural activity and its electromagnetic and hemodynamic correlates. We then explore the effects of stimulating the immature developing brain with information from exogenous sources, reviewing the available evidence concerning the characteristics of electromagnetic and hemodynamic responses. Once the characteristics of the correlates of neural dynamics have been determined, it will be essential to evaluate their possible modulation in the context of disease and in at-risk populations. Evidence can be collected with various neuroimaging techniques targeting both spontaneous and exogenously driven neural activity. A multimodal approach combining the neuromonitoring of different functional compartments (neuronal and vascular) is required to improve our understanding of the normal functioning and dysfunction of the brain and to identify neurobiomarkers for predicting the neurodevelopmental outcome of premature neonate and fetus. Such an approach would provide a framework for exploring early neurodevelopment, paving the way for the development of tools for earlier diagnosis in these vulnerable populations, thereby facilitating preventive, rescue and reparative neurotherapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2024.101556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The first 1000 days of life are of paramount importance for neonatal development. Premature newborns are exposed early to the external environment, modifying the fetal exposome and leading to overexposure in some sensory domains and deprivation in others. The resulting neurodevelopmental effects may persist throughout the individual's lifetime. Several neonatal neuromonitoring techniques can be used to investigate neural mechanisms in early postnatal development. EEG is the most widely used, as it is easy to perform, even at the patient's bedside. It is not expensive and provides information with a high temporal resolution and relatively good spatial resolution when performed in high-density mode. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a technique for monitoring vascular network dynamics, can also be used at the patient's bedside. It is not expensive and has a good spatial resolution at the cortical surface. These two techniques can be combined for simultaneous monitoring of the neuronal and vascular networks in premature newborns, providing insight into neurodevelopment before term. However, the extent to which more general conclusions about fetal development can be drawn from findings for premature neonates remains unclear due to considerable differences in environmental and medical situations. Fetal MEG (fMEG, as an alternative to EEG for preterm infants) and fMRI (as an alternative to fNIRS for preterm infants) can also be used to investigate fetal neurodevelopment on a trimester-specific basis. These techniques should be used for validation purposes as they are the only tools available for evaluating neuronal dysfunction in the fetus at the time of the gene-environment interactions influencing transient neuronal progenitor populations in brain structures. But what do these techniques tell us about early neurodevelopment? We address this question here, from two points of view. We first discuss spontaneous neural activity and its electromagnetic and hemodynamic correlates. We then explore the effects of stimulating the immature developing brain with information from exogenous sources, reviewing the available evidence concerning the characteristics of electromagnetic and hemodynamic responses. Once the characteristics of the correlates of neural dynamics have been determined, it will be essential to evaluate their possible modulation in the context of disease and in at-risk populations. Evidence can be collected with various neuroimaging techniques targeting both spontaneous and exogenously driven neural activity. A multimodal approach combining the neuromonitoring of different functional compartments (neuronal and vascular) is required to improve our understanding of the normal functioning and dysfunction of the brain and to identify neurobiomarkers for predicting the neurodevelopmental outcome of premature neonate and fetus. Such an approach would provide a framework for exploring early neurodevelopment, paving the way for the development of tools for earlier diagnosis in these vulnerable populations, thereby facilitating preventive, rescue and reparative neurotherapeutic interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视早产新生儿大脑发育的功能监测。临床护理和研究的新方向。
生命的最初 1000 天对新生儿的发育至关重要。早产儿过早地暴露于外部环境,改变了胎儿的暴露体,导致某些感官领域的过度暴露和另一些感官领域的剥夺。由此产生的神经发育影响可能会持续一生。有几种新生儿神经监测技术可用于研究出生后早期发育的神经机制。脑电图是应用最广泛的一种,因为它易于操作,甚至可以在病人床边进行。这种方法并不昂贵,在高密度模式下提供的信息具有较高的时间分辨率和相对较好的空间分辨率。功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)是一种监测血管网络动态的技术,也可在病人床旁使用。这种技术并不昂贵,而且在皮层表面具有良好的空间分辨率。这两种技术可以结合起来,对早产新生儿的神经元和血管网络进行同步监测,从而深入了解胎儿足月前的神经发育情况。然而,由于环境和医疗条件的巨大差异,从早产新生儿的研究结果中能得出多少有关胎儿发育的一般性结论仍不清楚。胎儿脑电图(fMEG,早产儿脑电图的替代方法)和胎儿核磁共振成像(fMRI,早产儿核磁共振成像的替代方法)也可用于研究胎儿神经发育的三个月特异性。这些技术应用于验证目的,因为它们是在基因与环境相互作用影响大脑结构中短暂神经元祖细胞群时评估胎儿神经元功能障碍的唯一可用工具。但这些技术能告诉我们早期神经发育的情况吗?在此,我们从两个角度来探讨这个问题。我们首先讨论自发神经活动及其电磁和血液动力学相关性。然后,我们探讨用外源信息刺激发育尚未成熟的大脑的效果,回顾有关电磁和血液动力学反应特征的现有证据。一旦确定了神经动力学相关因素的特征,就必须评估它们在疾病和高危人群中可能受到的调节。可以利用针对自发和外源性神经活动的各种神经成像技术来收集证据。我们需要一种结合不同功能区(神经元和血管)神经监测的多模式方法,以提高我们对大脑正常功能和功能障碍的认识,并确定预测早产新生儿和胎儿神经发育结果的神经生物标志物。这种方法将为探索早期神经发育提供一个框架,为开发早期诊断这些脆弱人群的工具铺平道路,从而促进预防、抢救和修复性神经治疗干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (formerly Seminars in Neonatology) is a bi-monthly journal which publishes topic-based issues, including current ''Hot Topics'' on the latest advances in fetal and neonatal medicine. The Journal is of interest to obstetricians and maternal-fetal medicine specialists. The Journal commissions review-based content covering current clinical opinion on the care and treatment of the pregnant patient and the neonate and draws on the necessary specialist knowledge, including that of the pediatric pulmonologist, the pediatric infectious disease specialist, the surgeon, as well as the general pediatrician and obstetrician. Each topic-based issue is edited by an authority in their field and contains 8-10 articles. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine provides: • Coverage of major developments in neonatal care; • Value to practising neonatologists, consultant and trainee pediatricians, obstetricians, midwives and fetal medicine specialists wishing to extend their knowledge in this field; • Up-to-date information in an attractive and relevant format.
期刊最新文献
Advocating for neonatology presence at births between 20 and 25 weeks of gestation. High-frequency jet ventilation in ELBW infants: A review and update. Assessment of Global Burden due to neonatal encephalopathy: An economic evaluation. Late preterm and early term birth: Challenges and dilemmas in clinical practice. Neonatal delirium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1