Population-based dietary risks for kidney stones: Implications for dietary counseling and prevention.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.5489/cuaj.8913
Anna J Black, Ghizlane Moussaoui, Connor M Forbes
{"title":"Population-based dietary risks for kidney stones: Implications for dietary counseling and prevention.","authors":"Anna J Black, Ghizlane Moussaoui, Connor M Forbes","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the context of the increasing incidence of kidney stones, we aimed to assess the percentage of the population who are eating an at-risk diet for kidney stones and to understand the baseline diet for future counseling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey, a national, cross-sectional instrument administered by Statistics Canada and Health Canada, was queried. Intake of relevant nutrients was compared to dietary risk factors for kidney stone formation. Factors associated with nutrient intake were analyzed in a multivariable regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data for 14 275 participants was included, of whom 24% consumed >2.5 of fluid per day and 9.4% consumed 1000-1200 mg of dietary calcium; 53.9% consumed too much sodium but 61% of the population had the recommended protein intake. Ninety-nine percent (99%) of the population had at least one dietary risk factor for kidney stone formation, while 92% had two or more risk factors. Fluid, sodium, calcium, and protein intake increased significantly with education level, income, and if employed (p<0.05 for all); however, fluid, protein, and sodium intake were lower in patients with hypertension and heart disease (p<0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While only a subset of the population will develop stones, this study shows that 99% of the population has a diet that elevates the risk of stone disease. As the incidence of kidney stones increases, population-based dietary interventions should be considered. Furthermore, clinicians may use these data to understand the average diet as a starting point for questioning and counseling patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In the context of the increasing incidence of kidney stones, we aimed to assess the percentage of the population who are eating an at-risk diet for kidney stones and to understand the baseline diet for future counseling.

Methods: The 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey, a national, cross-sectional instrument administered by Statistics Canada and Health Canada, was queried. Intake of relevant nutrients was compared to dietary risk factors for kidney stone formation. Factors associated with nutrient intake were analyzed in a multivariable regression.

Results: Data for 14 275 participants was included, of whom 24% consumed >2.5 of fluid per day and 9.4% consumed 1000-1200 mg of dietary calcium; 53.9% consumed too much sodium but 61% of the population had the recommended protein intake. Ninety-nine percent (99%) of the population had at least one dietary risk factor for kidney stone formation, while 92% had two or more risk factors. Fluid, sodium, calcium, and protein intake increased significantly with education level, income, and if employed (p<0.05 for all); however, fluid, protein, and sodium intake were lower in patients with hypertension and heart disease (p<0.05 for all).

Conclusions: While only a subset of the population will develop stones, this study shows that 99% of the population has a diet that elevates the risk of stone disease. As the incidence of kidney stones increases, population-based dietary interventions should be considered. Furthermore, clinicians may use these data to understand the average diet as a starting point for questioning and counseling patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人群的肾结石饮食风险:饮食咨询和预防的意义。
导言:在肾结石发病率不断上升的背景下,我们旨在评估肾结石高危饮食人群的比例,并了解基线饮食情况,为今后的咨询提供参考:方法:我们对 2015 年加拿大社区健康调查进行了查询,该调查是由加拿大统计局和加拿大卫生部管理的一项全国性横断面调查工具。将相关营养素的摄入量与肾结石形成的饮食风险因素进行了比较。通过多变量回归分析了与营养素摄入相关的因素:纳入了 14 275 名参与者的数据,其中 24% 的人每天摄入的液体量大于 2.5 升,9.4% 的人摄入的膳食钙量为 1000-1200 毫克;53.9% 的人摄入过多的钠,但 61% 的人摄入了推荐的蛋白质。99%的人至少有一个肾结石形成的饮食风险因素,92%的人有两个或两个以上的风险因素。液体、钠、钙和蛋白质的摄入量随受教育程度、收入和是否就业而显著增加(p 结论:虽然只有一部分人的膳食中含有肾结石的风险因素,但这部分人的膳食中却含有肾结石的风险因素:虽然只有一部分人会患结石,但这项研究表明,99% 的人的饮食会增加患结石病的风险。随着肾结石发病率的增加,应考虑对人群进行饮食干预。此外,临床医生可以利用这些数据来了解普通人的饮食习惯,以此作为询问和咨询病人的出发点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
期刊最新文献
Case - Emergent management of severe penile and scrotal edema due to prolonged metallic ring entrapment. Case - Ureteric entrapment following oblique lateral interbody fusion. Increased oscillation rate may improve morcellation efficiency in HoLEP. Population-based dietary risks for kidney stones: Implications for dietary counseling and prevention. Predicting cancer detection rates from multiparametric prostate MRI: Beyond the PI-RADS classification system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1