"We are protectors, not protestors": global impacts of extractivism on human-nature bonds.

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainability Science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1007/s11625-024-01526-1
Ksenija Hanaček, Dalena Tran, Arielle Landau, Teresa Sanz, May Aye Thiri, Grettel Navas, Daniela Del Bene, Juan Liu, Mariana Walter, Aida Lopez, Brototi Roy, Eleonora Fanari, Joan Martinez-Alier
{"title":"\"We are protectors, not protestors\": global impacts of extractivism on human-nature bonds.","authors":"Ksenija Hanaček, Dalena Tran, Arielle Landau, Teresa Sanz, May Aye Thiri, Grettel Navas, Daniela Del Bene, Juan Liu, Mariana Walter, Aida Lopez, Brototi Roy, Eleonora Fanari, Joan Martinez-Alier","doi":"10.1007/s11625-024-01526-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article analyzes the global impacts of extractivism on human-nature bonds. To do so, we rely on socio-ecological conflict data from the Global Atlas of Environmental Justice. Over 1800 cases involving resistance to the destruction of nature, cultures, cosmologies, worldviews, ancestral origins, and sacred places are analyzed using log-linear regression compared to 1600 cases that do not report such loss. The impact is especially visible when mineral ores, plantation products, and crude oil are extracted. The results indicate that affected groups are Indigenous peoples, farmers, peasants, pastoralists, and religious groups. In conflict outcomes, 79% of cases with refusal of compensation indicate impacts on human-nature bonds. Furthermore, in those cases where assassinations of activists occurred, 68% have observed impacts on human-nature bonds. Protecting human-nature bonds is a critical component for achieving social, economic, and environmental sustainability and justice against extractivism embedded in colonial relations playing against such bonds and environmental protectors.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11625-024-01526-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":49457,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Science","volume":"19 6","pages":"1789-1808"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01526-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the global impacts of extractivism on human-nature bonds. To do so, we rely on socio-ecological conflict data from the Global Atlas of Environmental Justice. Over 1800 cases involving resistance to the destruction of nature, cultures, cosmologies, worldviews, ancestral origins, and sacred places are analyzed using log-linear regression compared to 1600 cases that do not report such loss. The impact is especially visible when mineral ores, plantation products, and crude oil are extracted. The results indicate that affected groups are Indigenous peoples, farmers, peasants, pastoralists, and religious groups. In conflict outcomes, 79% of cases with refusal of compensation indicate impacts on human-nature bonds. Furthermore, in those cases where assassinations of activists occurred, 68% have observed impacts on human-nature bonds. Protecting human-nature bonds is a critical component for achieving social, economic, and environmental sustainability and justice against extractivism embedded in colonial relations playing against such bonds and environmental protectors.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11625-024-01526-1.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我们是保护者,不是抗议者":采掘业对人与自然关系的全球影响。
本文分析了采掘业对人与自然关系的全球影响。为此,我们利用了《全球环境正义地图集》(Global Atlas of Environmental Justice)中的社会生态冲突数据。我们使用对数线性回归法分析了 1800 多个涉及抵制破坏自然、文化、宇宙观、世界观、祖先起源和圣地的案例,并与 1600 个未报告此类损失的案例进行了对比。在开采矿石、种植园产品和原油时,影响尤为明显。结果表明,受影响的群体包括原住民、农民、牧民和宗教团体。在冲突结果中,79%的拒绝赔偿案例表明人与自然的联系受到了影响。此外,在发生暗杀积极分子事件的案例中,68%的案例表明人与自然的联系受到了影响。保护人与自然的纽带是实现社会、经济和环境可持续发展的重要组成部分,也是反对殖民关系中的采掘主义、反对这种纽带和环境保护者的正义之举:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s11625-024-01526-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainability Science
Sustainability Science 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Sustainability Science offers insights into interactions within and between nature and the rest of human society, and the complex mechanisms that sustain both. The journal promotes science based predictions and impact assessments of global change, and seeks ways to ensure that such knowledge can be understood by society and be used to strengthen the resilience of global natural systems (such as ecosystems, ocean and atmospheric systems, nutrient cycles), social systems (economies, governments, industry) and human systems at the individual level (lifestyles, health, security, and human values).
期刊最新文献
Monitoring environmental sustainability in Japan: an ESGAP assessment Directing personal sustainability science toward subjective experience: conceptual, methodological, and normative cornerstones for a first-person inquiry into inner worlds Can security be sustainable? Three perspectives on security and social sustainability: paradox, co-production, and deconstruction Critical hydrologic impacts from climate change: addressing an urgent global need NUS so fast: the social and ecological implications of a rapidly developing indigenous food economy in the Cape Town area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1