Variation Exists in Service Delivery: Similarities and Differences in the Provision of a Whole Genome Sequencing Service for Paediatric Rare Disease Patients in the National Health Service in England.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Public Health Genomics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1159/000542027
Nastazja Monika Laskowski, Angus Clarke, Christine Patch, Amanda Pichini, Melissa Hill, Sinead Whyte, Celine Lewis
{"title":"Variation Exists in Service Delivery: Similarities and Differences in the Provision of a Whole Genome Sequencing Service for Paediatric Rare Disease Patients in the National Health Service in England.","authors":"Nastazja Monika Laskowski, Angus Clarke, Christine Patch, Amanda Pichini, Melissa Hill, Sinead Whyte, Celine Lewis","doi":"10.1159/000542027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The National Health Service (NHS) in England is the first to offer whole genome sequencing (WGS) as part of standard care. As a high-income country with a universal healthcare system, England contributes a valuable perspective to global developments in WGS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an implementation science approach with mixed methods to characterise delivery of WGS for paediatric rare diseases: observations and field notes of consent appointments in clinical genetics and mainstream settings and follow-up qualitative semi-structured interviews with the clinical team. Process maps were developed for each department to identify similarities and variations between sites and thematic analysis of interview data to understand barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data collection occurred in 12 departments (7 genetic, 3 neurology, 1 cardiology, and 1 general paediatric) across 7 NHS Trusts. 26 observations of 21 healthcare professionals were conducted, alongside 19 follow-up interviews. Two master maps were developed - one for clinical genetics and one for the mainstream. We identified 11 steps involved in delivering WGS, including 9 variations and 9 similarities. We identified most variation in the processes related to the \"who,\" \"when,\" \"how,\" and \"where\" as these were aspects that could be adapted to fit into the specific set-up of the department. Barriers included reluctance to uptake in the mainstream and difficulties tracking samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recommendations include developing standard operating procedures and hiring healthcare professionals responsible for facilitating consent alongside administrative aspects. These would reduce the burden on clinical geneticists and improve turnaround times as well as contribute to streamlining and standardisation of the service.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The National Health Service (NHS) in England is the first to offer whole genome sequencing (WGS) as part of standard care. As a high-income country with a universal healthcare system, England contributes a valuable perspective to global developments in WGS.

Methods: We used an implementation science approach with mixed methods to characterise delivery of WGS for paediatric rare diseases: observations and field notes of consent appointments in clinical genetics and mainstream settings and follow-up qualitative semi-structured interviews with the clinical team. Process maps were developed for each department to identify similarities and variations between sites and thematic analysis of interview data to understand barriers and facilitators.

Results: Data collection occurred in 12 departments (7 genetic, 3 neurology, 1 cardiology, and 1 general paediatric) across 7 NHS Trusts. 26 observations of 21 healthcare professionals were conducted, alongside 19 follow-up interviews. Two master maps were developed - one for clinical genetics and one for the mainstream. We identified 11 steps involved in delivering WGS, including 9 variations and 9 similarities. We identified most variation in the processes related to the "who," "when," "how," and "where" as these were aspects that could be adapted to fit into the specific set-up of the department. Barriers included reluctance to uptake in the mainstream and difficulties tracking samples.

Conclusion: Recommendations include developing standard operating procedures and hiring healthcare professionals responsible for facilitating consent alongside administrative aspects. These would reduce the burden on clinical geneticists and improve turnaround times as well as contribute to streamlining and standardisation of the service.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服务提供存在差异:英国国家医疗服务机构为儿科罕见病患者提供全基因组测序服务的异同。
导言:英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)率先将全基因组测序(WGS)作为标准医疗服务的一部分。作为一个拥有全民医疗保健系统的高收入国家,英国为全球 WGS 的发展提供了宝贵的视角:我们采用混合方法的实施科学方法来描述儿科罕见病 WGS 的实施情况。我们对临床遗传学和主流环境中的同意预约进行了观察和实地记录,并对临床团队进行了后续定性半结构化访谈。为每个科室绘制流程图,以确定不同地点之间的相似性和差异性,并对访谈数据进行主题分析,以了解障碍和促进因素:数据收集工作在 7 家 NHS 信托基金会的 12 个科室(7 个遗传科、3 个神经科、1 个心脏科和 1 个普通儿科)进行。对 21 名医护人员进行了 26 次观察,并进行了 19 次后续访谈。绘制了两张主图--一张用于临床遗传学,另一张用于主流领域。我们确定了实施 WGS 所涉及的 11 个步骤,包括 9 个差异和 9 个相似之处。我们发现,在与 "谁"、"何时"、"如何 "和 "在哪里 "相关的流程中,差异最大,因为这些方面可以根据科室的具体设置进行调整。障碍包括:不愿接受主流观点和难以跟踪样本:建议包括制定标准操作程序,聘请医疗保健专业人员负责促进同意和行政方面的工作。这些措施将减轻临床遗传学家的负担,缩短周转时间,并促进服务的简化和标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the impact of screen-sharing visual aids during genomic results disclosure via telehealth in diverse families in the TeleKidSeq pilot study. Adopting public health genomics when the house is on fire: How will we navigate to 2030? Modern Family: An Ethical Justification for System-Led Contact of Relatives Eligible for Cascade Screening in the United States. Variation Exists in Service Delivery: Similarities and Differences in the Provision of a Whole Genome Sequencing Service for Paediatric Rare Disease Patients in the National Health Service in England. Evaluating the Implementation of the Rapid Prenatal Exome Sequencing Service in England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1