Feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of telehealth-delivered group exercise for people with type 2 diabetes: A pilot trial.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1177/1357633X241287966
Emily R Cox, Myles D Young, Shelley E Keating, Ryan J Drew, Matthew Kolasinski, Ronald C Plotnikoff
{"title":"Feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of telehealth-delivered group exercise for people with type 2 diabetes: A pilot trial.","authors":"Emily R Cox, Myles D Young, Shelley E Keating, Ryan J Drew, Matthew Kolasinski, Ronald C Plotnikoff","doi":"10.1177/1357633X241287966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several barriers can preclude people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from in-person exercise session participation. Telehealth may be an alternative mode of service delivery to increase uptake. We evaluated the feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of delivering group exercise via telehealth for people with T2D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen people with T2D (age 59.9 ± 12.7 years, 63% male, duration of T2D 11.5 ± 11.1 years) underwent an 8-week telehealth-delivered group exercise intervention. Weekly supervised sessions incorporated whole-body aerobic and resistance exercises, followed by education. Feasibility was evaluated by recruitment, enrolment, attendance and attrition rates, the practicality of telehealth delivery, and participant feedback. Adverse events were monitored throughout (safety). Preliminary efficacy was determined from changes in glycaemic control, body composition, blood pressure, exercise capacity, neuromuscular strength/fitness, quality of life and physical activity levels. The agreement/reliability of in-person clinician-measured versus telehealth-supervised participant-self-measured assessments was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility was supported by high attendance (97.1%) and low attrition (81%). All (100%) participants reported they would participate in telehealth-delivered exercise interventions in the future and would recommend them to other people with T2D. No serious adverse events were reported. There were improvements in hip circumference (Cohen's <i>d</i> -0.50), diastolic blood pressure (-0.75), exercise capacity (1.72), upper body strength (1.14), grip strength (0.58), health-related quality of life (0.76-0.81) and self-reported physical activity (1.14). Participant-self-measured assessment of body weight, 2-min step test and 30-sec sit-to-stand test were deemed acceptable.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Telehealth-delivered group exercise appears feasible, safe and efficacious for people with T2D. These findings warrant further exploration in a powered trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000379718).</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X241287966"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X241287966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Several barriers can preclude people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from in-person exercise session participation. Telehealth may be an alternative mode of service delivery to increase uptake. We evaluated the feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of delivering group exercise via telehealth for people with T2D.

Methods: Sixteen people with T2D (age 59.9 ± 12.7 years, 63% male, duration of T2D 11.5 ± 11.1 years) underwent an 8-week telehealth-delivered group exercise intervention. Weekly supervised sessions incorporated whole-body aerobic and resistance exercises, followed by education. Feasibility was evaluated by recruitment, enrolment, attendance and attrition rates, the practicality of telehealth delivery, and participant feedback. Adverse events were monitored throughout (safety). Preliminary efficacy was determined from changes in glycaemic control, body composition, blood pressure, exercise capacity, neuromuscular strength/fitness, quality of life and physical activity levels. The agreement/reliability of in-person clinician-measured versus telehealth-supervised participant-self-measured assessments was also evaluated.

Results: Feasibility was supported by high attendance (97.1%) and low attrition (81%). All (100%) participants reported they would participate in telehealth-delivered exercise interventions in the future and would recommend them to other people with T2D. No serious adverse events were reported. There were improvements in hip circumference (Cohen's d -0.50), diastolic blood pressure (-0.75), exercise capacity (1.72), upper body strength (1.14), grip strength (0.58), health-related quality of life (0.76-0.81) and self-reported physical activity (1.14). Participant-self-measured assessment of body weight, 2-min step test and 30-sec sit-to-stand test were deemed acceptable.

Discussion: Telehealth-delivered group exercise appears feasible, safe and efficacious for people with T2D. These findings warrant further exploration in a powered trial.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000379718).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对 2 型糖尿病患者的远程医疗团体锻炼的可行性、安全性和初步疗效:试点试验。
导言:2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者参加亲临现场的锻炼课程可能会遇到一些障碍。远程医疗可能是提高参与率的另一种服务模式。我们评估了通过远程医疗为 T2D 患者提供集体锻炼的可行性、安全性和初步效果:16 名 T2D 患者(年龄为 59.9 ± 12.7 岁,63% 为男性,T2D 病程为 11.5 ± 11.1 年)接受了为期 8 周的远程医疗团体锻炼干预。每周的监督课程包括全身有氧运动和阻力运动,随后进行教育。通过招募、注册、出勤率和自然减员率、远程医疗的实用性以及参与者的反馈来评估可行性。对不良事件进行了全程监控(安全性)。初步疗效根据血糖控制、身体成分、血压、运动能力、神经肌肉力量/健身、生活质量和体育锻炼水平的变化来确定。此外,还评估了临床医生现场测量与远程医疗监督下的参与者自测评估的一致性/可靠性:结果:参与率高(97.1%),自然减员率低(81%),证明了该方法的可行性。所有参与者(100%)都表示今后会参加远程医疗提供的运动干预,并会向其他 T2D 患者推荐。无严重不良事件报告。臀围(Cohen's d -0.50)、舒张压(-0.75)、运动能力(1.72)、上肢力量(1.14)、握力(0.58)、与健康相关的生活质量(0.76-0.81)和自我报告的体力活动(1.14)均有所改善。参与者自测的体重评估、2 分钟台阶测试和 30 秒坐立测试均被认为是可接受的:讨论:远程医疗提供的集体锻炼对患有糖尿病的人来说似乎是可行、安全和有效的。这些发现值得在有动力的试验中进一步探讨:试验注册:澳大利亚-新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12622000379718)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Satisfaction with videoconference-delivered CBT provided as part of a blended treatment approach for children and adolescents with mental disorders and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic: A follow-up survey among caregivers and therapists. Ear Portal: An urban-based ear, nose, and throat, and audiology referral telehealth portal to improve access to specialist ear health services for children. The Congenital Cardiology Cloud: Proof of feasibility of Germany's first tele-medical network for pediatric cardiology. Care trajectories for patients utilizing electronic visits for COVID-like symptoms in a large healthcare delivery system: May 2020-December 2021. Knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of telepharmacy (KPR-TP) questionnaire among pharmacists: Development and psychometric evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1