History of cervical excisional treatment is associated with changes in the cervical microbiota in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1080/14767058.2024.2425761
Jana Matulova, Ivana Musilova, Rudolf Kukla, Radka Bolehovska, Klara Balcarova, Johanna Wiik, Verena Sengpiel, Pavel Bostik, Bo Jacobsson, Marian Kacerovsky
{"title":"History of cervical excisional treatment is associated with changes in the cervical microbiota in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.","authors":"Jana Matulova, Ivana Musilova, Rudolf Kukla, Radka Bolehovska, Klara Balcarova, Johanna Wiik, Verena Sengpiel, Pavel Bostik, Bo Jacobsson, Marian Kacerovsky","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2425761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to determine the differences in the cervical load and prevalence of <i>Lactobacillus crispatus</i> DNA, <i>Lactobacillus iners</i> DNA, <i>Gardnerella vaginalis</i> DNA<i>, Sneathia sanguinegens</i> DNA, and <i>Ureaplasma</i> species DNA between pregnant women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) with and without a history of cervical excisional treatment. We also assessed the changes in the cervical load and prevalence of <i>L. crispatus</i> DNA, <i>L. iners</i> DNA, <i>G. vaginalis</i> DNA, <i>S. sanguinegens</i> DNA, and <i>U.</i> spp DNA. according to the cone length.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 132 women with singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM. For all women, information about the cervical loads of bacterial DNA corresponding to <i>L. crispatus</i>, <i>L. iners</i>, <i>G. vaginalis</i>, <i>S. sanguinegens</i>, and <i>U.</i> spp., which was assessed using PCR, was available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with a history of cervical excisional treatment had a higher cervical load of <i>L. iners</i> DNA (4.4 × 10<sup>6</sup> copies DNA/mL vs. 3.5 × 10<sup>5</sup> copies DNA/mL, <i>p</i> = .04) and a higher load and prevalence of <i>U</i>. spp. DNA (1.1 × 10<sup>5</sup> copies DNA/mL vs. 9.6 × 10<sup>4</sup> copies DNA/mL, <i>p</i> = .03; 2.7% vs. 0.5%, <i>p</i> = .04) than those without a history of cervical excisional treatment. In the subset of women with a history of cervical excisional treatment, those with a cone length 18 mm and more had a lower relative abundance of <i>L. crispatus</i> DNA (6% vs. 89%, <i>p</i> = .02), a higher load and relative abundance of <i>L. iners</i> DNA (1.1 × 10<sup>7</sup> copies DNA/mL vs. 8.2 × 10<sup>5</sup> copies DNA/mL, <i>p</i> = .04; 91% vs. 35%, <i>p</i> = .04), and higher loads of <i>G. vaginalis</i> DNA (7.6 × 10<sup>4</sup> copies DNA/mL vs. 3.2 × 10<sup>2</sup> copies DNA/mL, <i>p</i> = .02) than those with cone length < 18 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A history of cervical excisional treatment was associated with alterations in the cervical microbiota composition in pregnant women with PPROM.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2425761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine the differences in the cervical load and prevalence of Lactobacillus crispatus DNA, Lactobacillus iners DNA, Gardnerella vaginalis DNA, Sneathia sanguinegens DNA, and Ureaplasma species DNA between pregnant women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) with and without a history of cervical excisional treatment. We also assessed the changes in the cervical load and prevalence of L. crispatus DNA, L. iners DNA, G. vaginalis DNA, S. sanguinegens DNA, and U. spp DNA. according to the cone length.

Methods: This retrospective study included 132 women with singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM. For all women, information about the cervical loads of bacterial DNA corresponding to L. crispatus, L. iners, G. vaginalis, S. sanguinegens, and U. spp., which was assessed using PCR, was available.

Results: Women with a history of cervical excisional treatment had a higher cervical load of L. iners DNA (4.4 × 106 copies DNA/mL vs. 3.5 × 105 copies DNA/mL, p = .04) and a higher load and prevalence of U. spp. DNA (1.1 × 105 copies DNA/mL vs. 9.6 × 104 copies DNA/mL, p = .03; 2.7% vs. 0.5%, p = .04) than those without a history of cervical excisional treatment. In the subset of women with a history of cervical excisional treatment, those with a cone length 18 mm and more had a lower relative abundance of L. crispatus DNA (6% vs. 89%, p = .02), a higher load and relative abundance of L. iners DNA (1.1 × 107 copies DNA/mL vs. 8.2 × 105 copies DNA/mL, p = .04; 91% vs. 35%, p = .04), and higher loads of G. vaginalis DNA (7.6 × 104 copies DNA/mL vs. 3.2 × 102 copies DNA/mL, p = .02) than those with cone length < 18 mm.

Conclusions: A history of cervical excisional treatment was associated with alterations in the cervical microbiota composition in pregnant women with PPROM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈切除治疗史与早产胎膜早破妇女宫颈微生物群的变化有关。
研究背景本研究旨在确定有宫颈切除术治疗史和无宫颈切除术治疗史的早产胎膜早破(PPROM)孕妇的宫颈载量和脆片乳杆菌(Lactobacillus crispatus)DNA、阴道内乳杆菌(Lactobacillus iners)DNA、阴道加德纳菌(Gardnerella vaginalis)DNA、阴道杆菌(Sneathia sanguinegens)DNA和解脲支原体(Ureaplasma species)DNA流行率的差异。我们还根据锥体长度评估了宫颈负荷的变化以及L. crispatus DNA、L. iners DNA、G. vaginalis DNA、S. sanguinegens DNA和U. spp DNA的流行情况:这项回顾性研究纳入了 132 名并发 PPROM 的单胎妊娠妇女。所有妇女的宫颈中都含有与L. crispatus、L. iners、G. vaginalis、S. sanguinegens和U. spp.细菌DNA相对应的信息,这些信息通过PCR进行评估:结果:与无宫颈切除治疗史的妇女相比,有宫颈切除治疗史的妇女宫颈中的L. iners DNA载量更高(4.4 × 106 DNA拷贝/毫升 vs. 3.5 × 105 DNA拷贝/毫升,p = .04),U. spp. DNA的载量和流行率也更高(1.1 × 105 DNA拷贝/毫升 vs. 9.6 × 104 DNA拷贝/毫升,p = .03;2.7% vs. 0.5%,p = .04)。在有宫颈切除治疗史的妇女子集中,锥体长度为 18 毫米及以上的妇女中,L. crispatus DNA 的相对丰度较低(6% vs. 89%,p = .02),L. iners DNA 的载量和相对丰度较高(1.1 × 107 copies DNA/mL vs. 8.2 × 105 copies DNA/mL,p = .04;91% vs. 35%,p = .04),G. vaginalis DNA 的负荷量(7.6 × 104 copies DNA/mL vs. 3.2 × 102 copies DNA/mL,p = .02)高于锥体长度小于 18 mm 的患者:结论:宫颈切除治疗史与PPROM孕妇宫颈微生物群组成的改变有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor. History of cervical excisional treatment is associated with changes in the cervical microbiota in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. Effects of different physical exercise types on health outcomes of individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. Effects of maternal posture and cognitive-behavioral interventions on labor outcomes in primigravidas with abnormal fetal head position: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Interobserver agreement of intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation by midwives using current FIGO and physiology-based guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1