Living on the edge: Role of adjuvant therapy after resection of primary lung cancer within 2 millimeters of a T-stage cutoff

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the use of systemic therapy and overall survival in patients with resected non−small cell lung cancer whose pathologic tumor size was within 2 mm of a T-stage cutoff.

Methods

This was retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database of patients who underwent resection of tumors within 2 mm of the T1c/T2a, T2a/T2b, and T2b/T3 T-stage cutoffs. Patients with nodal involvement or whose T stage was determined on the basis of pathologic features other than tumor size were excluded. A multistate model compared the primary outcomes of systemic therapy and overall survival.

Results

From the National Cancer Database, 18,490 patients were identified: 9966 at the T1c/T2a cutoff, 5593 at the T2a/T2b cutoff, and 2931 at the T2b/T3 cutoff. Peaks in tumor size distribution occurred at 5-mm intervals. On the basis of an expected normalized curve, 2050 patients (11.1%) may have been understaged. Use of systemic therapy was greater among patients with larger tumors at the T1c/T2a cutoff (7.1% vs 8.9%; P < .001), the T2a/T2b cutoff (20.0% vs 25.5%; P < .001), and the T2b/T3 cutoff (31.2% vs 41.8%; P < .001). In a multistate model, mortality was greater above the T1c/T2a cutoff (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; P = .01), T2a/T2b cutoff (HR, 1.17; P < .01), and T2b/T3 cutoff (HR, 1.13; P = .03). In patients who received systemic therapy, this trend was eliminated (HR, 1.24; P = .14, HR, 0.79; P = .07, and HR, 1.23; P = .09, respectively).

Conclusions

Rounding of tumor size for pathologic staging is common. Although seemingly trivial, rounding may downstage patients and is associated with decreased rates of adjuvant therapy use and potentially worse overall survival.