Calculating risk and prevalence ratios and differences in R: Developing intuition with a hands-on tutorial and code

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Annals of Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.10.004
Rachel R. Yorlets , Youjin Lee , Jason R. Gantenberg
{"title":"Calculating risk and prevalence ratios and differences in R: Developing intuition with a hands-on tutorial and code","authors":"Rachel R. Yorlets ,&nbsp;Youjin Lee ,&nbsp;Jason R. Gantenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Epidemiologic research questions often focus on evaluating binary outcomes, yet curricula and scientific literature do not always provide clear guidance or examples on selecting and calculating an appropriate measure of association in these scenarios. Reporting inappropriate measures may lead to misleading statistical conclusions. We present a hands-on tutorial that includes annotated code written in an open-source statistical programming language (R) showing readers how to apply, compare, and understand four methods used to estimate a risk or prevalence ratio (or difference), rather than presenting an odds ratio. We will provide guidance on when to use each method, discuss the strengths and limitations of each approach, and compare the results obtained across them. Ultimately, we aim to help trainees, public health researchers, and interdisciplinary professionals develop an intuition for these methods and empower them to implement and interpret these methods in their own research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"99 ","pages":"Pages 48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279724002461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidemiologic research questions often focus on evaluating binary outcomes, yet curricula and scientific literature do not always provide clear guidance or examples on selecting and calculating an appropriate measure of association in these scenarios. Reporting inappropriate measures may lead to misleading statistical conclusions. We present a hands-on tutorial that includes annotated code written in an open-source statistical programming language (R) showing readers how to apply, compare, and understand four methods used to estimate a risk or prevalence ratio (or difference), rather than presenting an odds ratio. We will provide guidance on when to use each method, discuss the strengths and limitations of each approach, and compare the results obtained across them. Ultimately, we aim to help trainees, public health researchers, and interdisciplinary professionals develop an intuition for these methods and empower them to implement and interpret these methods in their own research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用 R 计算风险和流行率以及差异:通过实践教程和代码培养直觉。
流行病学研究问题通常侧重于评估二元结果,但课程和科学文献并不总是提供明确的指导或示例,说明如何在这些情况下选择和计算适当的关联测量。报告不恰当的测量值可能会导致误导性的统计结论。我们将介绍一个实践教程,其中包括用开源统计编程语言(R)编写的带注释的代码,向读者展示如何应用、比较和理解用于估算风险或流行率(或差异)的四种方法,而不是给出一个几率比率。我们将指导读者何时使用每种方法,讨论每种方法的优势和局限性,并比较各种方法得出的结果。最终,我们旨在帮助受训人员、公共卫生研究人员和跨学科专业人员培养对这些方法的直觉,并使他们有能力在自己的研究中实施和解释这些方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
期刊最新文献
History of arrest and firearm ownership among low-income US military veterans Reevaluating Diabetes and COVID-19 outcomes using national-level data. Trends and disparities in violence-related injury morbidity among pregnant and postpartum individuals Editorial Board Contextualizing the Conclusion Generator: From the ASA statement to PhD curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1