Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Form of the Family Support Scale for the Older People.

Tuğba Solmaz, Tuba Korkmaz Aslan
{"title":"Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Form of the Family Support Scale for the Older People.","authors":"Tuğba Solmaz, Tuba Korkmaz Aslan","doi":"10.5152/FNJN.2024.24116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The Family Support Scale is a used scale to assess family support in older people. The purpose of this study was to test the Family Support Scale for older people in Turkish and to examine its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a methodological study. This study sample enrolled 250 older individuals. The study was conducted between July-December 2022. In data collection, sociodemographic information form and The Family Support scale were used. The inclusion criteria for this study selected participants who were 65 years or older, literate, open to communication, living with at least one family member, and who volunteered to participate in the research. In the study, who developed the original scale, was contacted via e-mail and the necessary permission was obtained for the Turkish validity and reliability of the scale. Language equivalence, content validity, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis of the scale were performed. Internal consistency and total item score correlation were calculated to ensure validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale is compatible in terms of language and content suitability, CVI (Language)= 0.87; CVI (Content)=0.099. In the validity analyzes of the scale; the factor loadings values of the scale were found to be between 0.36 and 0.83, and the explained variance (54.78%) was at a sufficient level according to the EFA results. It was determined that factor loading values for all items were varied between 0.58 and 0.97 and factor load values were statistically significant in CFA (p<.05). It was determined that the fit indices were RMSEA=0.064, GFI=0.99, CFI=0.99, NFI=0.99, x2/df=2.03 at the desired level. In the reliability analysis, it was found that the internal consistency coefficient (α: 0.94) was quite reliable, and the total correlation values of the scale ranged between 0.48 and 0.83.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cross-cultural adaptation of this scale has been realized successfully in Turkish. Health care providers may utilize this tool to evaluate family support for older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":73033,"journal":{"name":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","volume":"32 3","pages":"284-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2024.24116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The Family Support Scale is a used scale to assess family support in older people. The purpose of this study was to test the Family Support Scale for older people in Turkish and to examine its validity and reliability.

Methods: This was a methodological study. This study sample enrolled 250 older individuals. The study was conducted between July-December 2022. In data collection, sociodemographic information form and The Family Support scale were used. The inclusion criteria for this study selected participants who were 65 years or older, literate, open to communication, living with at least one family member, and who volunteered to participate in the research. In the study, who developed the original scale, was contacted via e-mail and the necessary permission was obtained for the Turkish validity and reliability of the scale. Language equivalence, content validity, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis of the scale were performed. Internal consistency and total item score correlation were calculated to ensure validity and reliability.

Results: The scale is compatible in terms of language and content suitability, CVI (Language)= 0.87; CVI (Content)=0.099. In the validity analyzes of the scale; the factor loadings values of the scale were found to be between 0.36 and 0.83, and the explained variance (54.78%) was at a sufficient level according to the EFA results. It was determined that factor loading values for all items were varied between 0.58 and 0.97 and factor load values were statistically significant in CFA (p<.05). It was determined that the fit indices were RMSEA=0.064, GFI=0.99, CFI=0.99, NFI=0.99, x2/df=2.03 at the desired level. In the reliability analysis, it was found that the internal consistency coefficient (α: 0.94) was quite reliable, and the total correlation values of the scale ranged between 0.48 and 0.83.

Conclusion: The cross-cultural adaptation of this scale has been realized successfully in Turkish. Health care providers may utilize this tool to evaluate family support for older people.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人家庭支持量表土耳其形式的有效性和可靠性研究。
目的:家庭支持量表是一种用于评估老年人家庭支持的量表。本研究的目的是测试土耳其老年人家庭支持量表,并检验其有效性和可靠性:这是一项方法研究。研究样本包括 250 名老年人。研究时间为 2022 年 7 月至 12 月。数据收集采用社会人口信息表和家庭支持量表。本研究的纳入标准选择了 65 岁或以上、识字、乐于交流、至少与一名家庭成员生活在一起并自愿参与研究的参与者。在研究过程中,我们通过电子邮件联系了开发原始量表的人员,并获得了必要的许可,以便对量表进行土耳其语效度和信度分析。对量表进行了语言等效性、内容效度、探索性因素分析和确认性因素分析。计算了内部一致性和项目总分相关性,以确保量表的有效性和可靠性:结果:量表在语言和内容的适用性方面是兼容的,CVI(语言)= 0.87;CVI(内容)= 0.099。在量表的效度分析中,发现量表的因子负荷值介于 0.36 和 0.83 之间,根据 EFA 结果,解释方差(54.78%)处于足够水平。所有项目的因子载荷值均在 0.58 至 0.97 之间,因子载荷值在 CFA 中具有统计学意义(p 结论:该量表的跨文化改编在土耳其语中已成功实现。医疗服务提供者可以利用这一工具来评估家庭对老年人的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Kangaroo Mother Care on Perfusion Index, Heart Rate, and Oxygen Saturation in Premature Infants Who were Discharged Early and Admitted to The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Control Tria. Knowledge and Attitude on Neonatal Resuscitation Among Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Shivering Hopes: A Qualitative Inquiry into the Experiences of Family Caregivers of Critically Ill Patients Reliant on Health Care Technology. The Impact of Clinical Practice Stress on Nursing Professional Competence among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Narrowing of Self as Perceived by People in the Early Stages of Dementia-The Second Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1