Tools for Assessing Communication in Pharmacy Education: Review and Recommendations.

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101328
J E McLaughlin, K Kelley, S Mortha, J Bowen
{"title":"Tools for Assessing Communication in Pharmacy Education: Review and Recommendations.","authors":"J E McLaughlin, K Kelley, S Mortha, J Bowen","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Well-developed and finely tuned communication skills are foundational for pharmacists and should be at the core of PharmD curricula. The objective of this narrative review was to identify and summarize useful instruments for pharmacy educators interested in assessing communication skills.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Fifty-seven studies were evaluated. Eighteen studies with communication assessment instruments that were readily available and deemed useful by the research team were included for further review. Most focused on oral communication (n=15), included pharmacy students as the communicators (n=14), and utilized instructors as the assessors in the didactic, simulation, OSCE, or experiential settings (n=18). The communication tasks (e.g., patient counseling, medication history taking, SOAP notes), contexts (e.g., community pharmacy), and scales of measurement varied for each instrument.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While communication is a critical skill for pharmacy students, its assessment is complicated by the potential need for various types of assessors, communication tasks, and contexts. This review describes a set of useful assessment instruments to aid pharmacy educators in selecting an appropriate tool, or adapting an existing one, to meet their course or program assessment needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Well-developed and finely tuned communication skills are foundational for pharmacists and should be at the core of PharmD curricula. The objective of this narrative review was to identify and summarize useful instruments for pharmacy educators interested in assessing communication skills.

Findings: Fifty-seven studies were evaluated. Eighteen studies with communication assessment instruments that were readily available and deemed useful by the research team were included for further review. Most focused on oral communication (n=15), included pharmacy students as the communicators (n=14), and utilized instructors as the assessors in the didactic, simulation, OSCE, or experiential settings (n=18). The communication tasks (e.g., patient counseling, medication history taking, SOAP notes), contexts (e.g., community pharmacy), and scales of measurement varied for each instrument.

Summary: While communication is a critical skill for pharmacy students, its assessment is complicated by the potential need for various types of assessors, communication tasks, and contexts. This review describes a set of useful assessment instruments to aid pharmacy educators in selecting an appropriate tool, or adapting an existing one, to meet their course or program assessment needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估药学教育中交流的工具:回顾与建议》。
目标:完善和精巧的沟通技能是药剂师的基础,应成为药学博士课程的核心。本综述旨在为有兴趣评估沟通技能的药学教育者确定和总结有用的工具:对 57 项研究进行了评估。其中 18 项研究的沟通评估工具是现成的,而且研究小组认为这些工具非常有用,因此将其纳入了进一步的综述。大多数研究侧重于口语交流(15 项),将药学专业学生作为交流者(14 项),并在授课、模拟、OSCE 或体验环境中利用指导者作为评估者(18 项)。每种工具的沟通任务(如患者咨询、用药史采集、SOAP 笔记)、情境(如社区药房)和测量尺度都各不相同。摘要:虽然沟通是药学专业学生的一项重要技能,但由于可能需要各种类型的评估者、沟通任务和情境,其评估也变得复杂起来。本综述介绍了一系列有用的评估工具,以帮助药学教育者选择合适的工具或调整现有工具,满足其课程或项目评估的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
期刊最新文献
A Multisite, Longitudinal Study Assessing Prevalence of Anxiety in Student Pharmacists. Association Of Emotional Intelligence With Pharmacy Students' Leadership And Academic Performance. Developing Allies: Preparing Pharmacy Students to Practice with Cultural and Structural Humility. Determining ideal practices for student course evaluations using a modified Delphi approach. Perceptions of Pharmacy Faculty Regarding Factors Contributing to Declining First-Time NAPLEX Pass Rates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1