Patients' Nonattendance in Outpatient Specialist Consultations: A National Cohort Analysis of a Health System.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S468455
João Marcelo Barreto Silva, Paulo Henrique De Souza Bermejo, Marina Figueiredo Moreira, David Nadler Prata, Daniela Mascarenhas de Queiroz Trevisan, Otávio Augusto Dos Santos
{"title":"Patients' Nonattendance in Outpatient Specialist Consultations: A National Cohort Analysis of a Health System.","authors":"João Marcelo Barreto Silva, Paulo Henrique De Souza Bermejo, Marina Figueiredo Moreira, David Nadler Prata, Daniela Mascarenhas de Queiroz Trevisan, Otávio Augusto Dos Santos","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S468455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Analyzing patients' nonattendance at medical appointments helps address an issue impacting the management and sustainability of health systems globally, providing valuable insights for healthcare managers. This study aims to identify factors at both patient and health system levels that contribute to understanding missed appointments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis was conducted using data from secondary care consultations within the Brazilian Unified Health System between April 2018 and March 2020. Primary care includes general medical consultations, while secondary care involves specialized services provided by doctors with advanced expertise. We examined demographic factors (age, sex, race/color, socioeconomic level) and health system practices (waiting time, hospitalization, distance to service, medical specialty, and severity of clinical condition) to assess their impact on patient attendance. A weighted analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were applied to determine the relative risk of nonattendance.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 5,003,159 consultations, 435,523 (8.7%) were missed. Nonattendance was highest among patients facing long distances to the service (13.3%, [RRR] 1.227), younger age (16-30 years: 11.8%, [RRR] 1.041), and waiting times (>30: 10.9%, [RRR] 1.738). Socially vulnerable patients were more likely to miss appointments (9.6%, [RRR] 1.055) compared to less vulnerable groups (8.6%). Practice-level factors had a slightly greater impact on nonattendance (ROC: 0.621) than patient-level factors (ROC: 0.5674). The overall predictive model achieved a C statistic of 0.6228, resulting in a fair predictive ability. However, the model showed only modest prediction of no-shows, indicating the need for more detailed data to improve accuracy. Gauging which group suffers the highest risk of nonattendance was a secondary goal of this analysis.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Young, socially vulnerable patients with long commutes and extended waiting times are at higher risk of nonattendance. Effective management of these risk factors and targeted preventive actions are essential to reduce absenteeism and improve health system efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"2705-2716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S468455","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Analyzing patients' nonattendance at medical appointments helps address an issue impacting the management and sustainability of health systems globally, providing valuable insights for healthcare managers. This study aims to identify factors at both patient and health system levels that contribute to understanding missed appointments.

Methods: The analysis was conducted using data from secondary care consultations within the Brazilian Unified Health System between April 2018 and March 2020. Primary care includes general medical consultations, while secondary care involves specialized services provided by doctors with advanced expertise. We examined demographic factors (age, sex, race/color, socioeconomic level) and health system practices (waiting time, hospitalization, distance to service, medical specialty, and severity of clinical condition) to assess their impact on patient attendance. A weighted analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were applied to determine the relative risk of nonattendance.

Findings: Of 5,003,159 consultations, 435,523 (8.7%) were missed. Nonattendance was highest among patients facing long distances to the service (13.3%, [RRR] 1.227), younger age (16-30 years: 11.8%, [RRR] 1.041), and waiting times (>30: 10.9%, [RRR] 1.738). Socially vulnerable patients were more likely to miss appointments (9.6%, [RRR] 1.055) compared to less vulnerable groups (8.6%). Practice-level factors had a slightly greater impact on nonattendance (ROC: 0.621) than patient-level factors (ROC: 0.5674). The overall predictive model achieved a C statistic of 0.6228, resulting in a fair predictive ability. However, the model showed only modest prediction of no-shows, indicating the need for more detailed data to improve accuracy. Gauging which group suffers the highest risk of nonattendance was a secondary goal of this analysis.

Interpretation: Young, socially vulnerable patients with long commutes and extended waiting times are at higher risk of nonattendance. Effective management of these risk factors and targeted preventive actions are essential to reduce absenteeism and improve health system efficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊专家会诊中患者的缺席情况:一个医疗系统的全国队列分析。
背景:分析患者不赴约就医的情况有助于解决影响全球医疗系统的管理和可持续性的问题,为医疗管理人员提供有价值的见解。本研究旨在从患者和医疗系统两个层面找出有助于了解失约情况的因素:分析使用的数据来自 2018 年 4 月至 2020 年 3 月期间巴西统一医疗系统内的二级医疗咨询。初级医疗包括普通医疗咨询,而二级医疗则涉及由具有高级专业知识的医生提供的专业服务。我们研究了人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、种族/肤色、社会经济水平)和医疗系统惯例(等待时间、住院、服务距离、医疗专业和临床病情严重程度),以评估它们对患者就诊率的影响。采用加权分析和接收者操作特征(ROC)分析来确定不就诊的相对风险:在 5,003,159 次就诊中,有 435,523 次(8.7%)缺席。在路途遥远(13.3%,[RRR] 1.227)、年龄较小(16-30 岁:11.8%,[RRR] 1.041)和等待时间较长(大于 30 岁:10.9%,[RRR] 1.738)的患者中,未就诊率最高。与弱势群体(8.6%)相比,社会弱势群体患者更容易错过预约(9.6%,[RRR] 1.055)。诊所层面的因素对失约率的影响(ROC:0.621)略高于患者层面的因素(ROC:0.5674)。整体预测模型的 C 统计量为 0.6228,预测能力尚可。不过,该模型对未就诊率的预测效果一般,这表明需要更详细的数据来提高准确性。判断哪个群体的缺席风险最高是这项分析的次要目标:年轻、社会弱势、通勤时间长、等待时间长的患者不就诊的风险较高。对这些风险因素进行有效管理并采取有针对性的预防措施,对于降低缺勤率和提高医疗系统效率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
Factors Influencing Occupational Stress of State Security Forces During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Between Single-Use and Reprocessed IPC Sleeves [Response to Letter]. Does Vision Health Knowledge Matter? A Cross-Sectional Study of Primary School Students in Rural China. Job Satisfaction Among Faculty in Standardized Residency Training Programs in Heilongjiang Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Decreased Work Capability Related to High-Altitude Exposure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1