Hatchery type influences the gill microbiome of Atlantic farmed salmon (Salmo salar) after transfer to sea.

IF 4.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Animal microbiome Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1186/s42523-024-00347-y
Kelly J Stewart, Annette S Boerlage, William Barr, Umer Z Ijaz, Cindy J Smith
{"title":"Hatchery type influences the gill microbiome of Atlantic farmed salmon (Salmo salar) after transfer to sea.","authors":"Kelly J Stewart, Annette S Boerlage, William Barr, Umer Z Ijaz, Cindy J Smith","doi":"10.1186/s42523-024-00347-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Salmon aquaculture involves freshwater and seawater phases. Recently there has been an increase in multifactorial gill health challenges during the seawater phase which has led to an urgent need to understand the gill microbiome. There is a lack of understanding on what drives the composition of the gill microbiome, and the influence the freshwater stage has on its long-term composition. We characterise the gill microbiome from seven cohorts of Atlantic salmon raised in six different freshwater operational systems-recirculating aquaculture system (RAS), flowthrough (FT) and loch-based system, prior to and after transfer to seven seawater farms, over two different input seasons, S0 (2018) and S1 (2019).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the V1-V2 region of the 16S rRNA gene, we produced amplicon libraries absent of host contamination. We showed that hatchery system influenced the gill microbiome (PERMAOVA R<sup>2</sup> = 0.226, p < 0.001). Loch and FT systems were more similar to each other than the three RAS systems, which clustered together. On transfer to sea, the gill microbiomes of all fish changed and became more similar irrespective of the initial hatchery system, seawater farm location or season of input. Even though the gill microbiome among seawater farm locations were different between locations (PERMAOVA R<sup>2</sup> = 0.528, p < 0.001), a clustering of the gill microbiomes by hatchery system of origin was still observed 7-25 days after transfer (PERMAOVA R = 0.164, p < 0.001). Core microbiomes at genera level were observed among all fish in addition to freshwater only, and seawater only. At ASV level core microbiomes were observed among FT and loch freshwater systems only and among all seawater salmon. The gill microbiome and surrounding water at each hatchery had more shared ASVs than seawater farms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We showed hatchery system, loch, FT or RAS, significantly impacted the gill microbiome. On transfer to sea, the microbiomes changed and became more similar. After transfer, the individual sites to which the fish were transferred has a significant influence on microbiome composition, but interesting some clustering by hatchery system remained. Future gill disease mitigation methods that target enhancing the gill microbiome may be most effective in the freshwater stage, as there were more shared ASVs between water and gill at hatchery, compared to at sea.</p>","PeriodicalId":72201,"journal":{"name":"Animal microbiome","volume":"6 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-024-00347-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Salmon aquaculture involves freshwater and seawater phases. Recently there has been an increase in multifactorial gill health challenges during the seawater phase which has led to an urgent need to understand the gill microbiome. There is a lack of understanding on what drives the composition of the gill microbiome, and the influence the freshwater stage has on its long-term composition. We characterise the gill microbiome from seven cohorts of Atlantic salmon raised in six different freshwater operational systems-recirculating aquaculture system (RAS), flowthrough (FT) and loch-based system, prior to and after transfer to seven seawater farms, over two different input seasons, S0 (2018) and S1 (2019).

Results: Using the V1-V2 region of the 16S rRNA gene, we produced amplicon libraries absent of host contamination. We showed that hatchery system influenced the gill microbiome (PERMAOVA R2 = 0.226, p < 0.001). Loch and FT systems were more similar to each other than the three RAS systems, which clustered together. On transfer to sea, the gill microbiomes of all fish changed and became more similar irrespective of the initial hatchery system, seawater farm location or season of input. Even though the gill microbiome among seawater farm locations were different between locations (PERMAOVA R2 = 0.528, p < 0.001), a clustering of the gill microbiomes by hatchery system of origin was still observed 7-25 days after transfer (PERMAOVA R = 0.164, p < 0.001). Core microbiomes at genera level were observed among all fish in addition to freshwater only, and seawater only. At ASV level core microbiomes were observed among FT and loch freshwater systems only and among all seawater salmon. The gill microbiome and surrounding water at each hatchery had more shared ASVs than seawater farms.

Conclusion: We showed hatchery system, loch, FT or RAS, significantly impacted the gill microbiome. On transfer to sea, the microbiomes changed and became more similar. After transfer, the individual sites to which the fish were transferred has a significant influence on microbiome composition, but interesting some clustering by hatchery system remained. Future gill disease mitigation methods that target enhancing the gill microbiome may be most effective in the freshwater stage, as there were more shared ASVs between water and gill at hatchery, compared to at sea.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孵化场类型会影响大西洋养殖鲑鱼(Salmo salar)转移到海洋后的鳃微生物组。
背景:三文鱼养殖涉及淡水和海水阶段。最近,海水阶段多因素鳃健康挑战的增加导致人们迫切需要了解鳃微生物组。人们对鳃微生物群组成的驱动因素以及淡水阶段对其长期组成的影响还缺乏了解。我们在两个不同的投入季节(S0(2018 年)和 S1(2019 年))对在六种不同的淡水运行系统--循环水养殖系统(RAS)、穿流式养殖系统(FT)和基于湖泊的系统--中养殖的七组大西洋鲑鱼在转移到七个海水养殖场之前和之后的鳃微生物组进行了表征:利用 16S rRNA 基因的 V1-V2 区域,我们生成了没有宿主污染的扩增子文库。结果表明,孵化系统对鳃微生物组有影响(PERMAOVA R2 = 0.226,P 2 = 0.528,P 结论:孵化系统与鳃微生物组之间存在着明显的差异:我们发现孵化系统、湖泊、FT 或 RAS 对鳃微生物组有显著影响。转入海洋后,微生物组发生了变化,变得更加相似。转运后,鱼类转运到的各个地点对微生物组的组成有很大影响,但孵化系统仍然存在一些有趣的聚类。未来以增强鳃部微生物组为目标的鳃病缓解方法可能在淡水阶段最有效,因为与在海上相比,在孵化场的水和鳃之间有更多的共享ASV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Increasing the level of hemicelluloses in the lactation diet affects the faecal microbiota of sows and their piglets without affecting their performances. Single-strain probiotics enhance growth, anti-pathogen immunity, and resistance to Nocardia seriolae in grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) via gut microbiota modulation. Changes in social environment impact primate gut microbiota composition. Hatchery type influences the gill microbiome of Atlantic farmed salmon (Salmo salar) after transfer to sea. Diet affects reproductive development and microbiota composition in honey bees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1