Medications for opioid use disorder and other evidence-based service offerings in faith-affiliated treatment centers: Implications for implementation partnerships

Kim Gannon , Charles A. Warnock
{"title":"Medications for opioid use disorder and other evidence-based service offerings in faith-affiliated treatment centers: Implications for implementation partnerships","authors":"Kim Gannon ,&nbsp;Charles A. Warnock","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Amidst an ongoing surge of opioid use disorder (OUD) incidence, clinicians and policymakers are seeking partnerships with faith communities – including with faith-affiliated treatment centers (FATCs) – to expand access to evidence-based OUD treatment. However, little is known whether FATCs differentially offer such evidence-based treatment services, particularly medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and co-occurring mental health care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We use the 2021 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey (N-SUMHSS) to examine differences in provision of several OUD services, including MOUD, psychological treatments, mental health services, medical services, recovery support services, and services related to treatment accessibility, between self-identified FATCs and non-FATCs. We also explored differences in characteristics related to insurance, licensure, and accreditation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>FATCs were less likely than non-FATCs to offer almost all measure of MOUD and more likely to refuse to accept clients who use MOUD. They were also less likely to report using telemedicine. However, they were more likely to offer residential treatment, Twelve Step facilitation, and transitional housing. We find little evidence that FATCs offer co-occurring mental health treatments at different rates than non-FATCs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>More research is needed to examine the factors that drive these differences, especially in MOUD and transitional housing. When partnering with FATCs, clinicians and policymakers should seek common ground with FATCs and recognize the philosophies, values, and concerns that may potentially be driving these differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 209572"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Amidst an ongoing surge of opioid use disorder (OUD) incidence, clinicians and policymakers are seeking partnerships with faith communities – including with faith-affiliated treatment centers (FATCs) – to expand access to evidence-based OUD treatment. However, little is known whether FATCs differentially offer such evidence-based treatment services, particularly medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and co-occurring mental health care.

Methods

We use the 2021 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey (N-SUMHSS) to examine differences in provision of several OUD services, including MOUD, psychological treatments, mental health services, medical services, recovery support services, and services related to treatment accessibility, between self-identified FATCs and non-FATCs. We also explored differences in characteristics related to insurance, licensure, and accreditation.

Results

FATCs were less likely than non-FATCs to offer almost all measure of MOUD and more likely to refuse to accept clients who use MOUD. They were also less likely to report using telemedicine. However, they were more likely to offer residential treatment, Twelve Step facilitation, and transitional housing. We find little evidence that FATCs offer co-occurring mental health treatments at different rates than non-FATCs.

Conclusion

More research is needed to examine the factors that drive these differences, especially in MOUD and transitional housing. When partnering with FATCs, clinicians and policymakers should seek common ground with FATCs and recognize the philosophies, values, and concerns that may potentially be driving these differences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教信仰治疗中心提供的阿片类药物使用障碍药物及其他循证服务:对实施伙伴关系的影响。
导言:在阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)发病率持续激增的情况下,临床医生和政策制定者正在寻求与宗教团体(包括宗教信仰治疗中心(FATC))建立合作关系,以扩大阿片类药物使用障碍循证治疗的可及性。然而,人们对宗教信仰治疗中心是否有区别地提供此类循证治疗服务,尤其是阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的药物治疗和并发症的心理保健服务知之甚少:我们利用 2021 年全国药物使用和心理健康服务调查(N-SUMHSS)来研究自认的 FATC 和非 FATC 在提供几种 OUD 服务方面的差异,包括 MOUD、心理治疗、心理健康服务、医疗服务、康复支持服务以及与治疗可及性相关的服务。我们还探讨了与保险、执照和认证相关的特征差异:与非 FATC 相比,FATC 不太可能提供几乎所有的 MOUD 治疗措施,也更有可能拒绝接受使用 MOUD 的客户。它们也较少报告使用远程医疗。不过,它们更有可能提供住院治疗、十二步促进法和过渡性住房。我们几乎没有发现证据表明,与非 FATC 相比,FATC 在提供共存精神健康治疗方面的比例有所不同:结论:我们需要进行更多的研究,来探讨导致这些差异的因素,尤其是在 MOUD 和过渡性住房方面。在与 FATC 合作时,临床医生和政策制定者应寻求与 FATC 的共同点,并认识到可能导致这些差异的理念、价值观和关注点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classes of outpatient quality of care among individuals with substance-related disorders, based on a survey and health insurance registry. Description of implementing a mail-based overdose education and naloxone distribution program in community supervision settings during COVID-19. Association between Comprehensive Primary Care Plus and opioid prescribing and prescription fills among Medicare beneficiaries. Text message-delivered cannabis use disorder treatment with young adults: A large randomized clinical trial. Institutional variation of smoking cessation success in Taiwan: A multi-level analysis of the National Second-Generation Tobacco Cessation Program Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1