Exploring the potential of Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART Recovery) mutual-help groups for supporting people who use methamphetamine: A qualitative study examining participant experience of initiation and engagement

Alison K. Beck , Briony Larance , Victoria Manning , Frank P. Deane , Amanda L. Baker , Leanne Hides , Anthony Shakeshaft , Angela Argent , Peter J. Kelly
{"title":"Exploring the potential of Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART Recovery) mutual-help groups for supporting people who use methamphetamine: A qualitative study examining participant experience of initiation and engagement","authors":"Alison K. Beck ,&nbsp;Briony Larance ,&nbsp;Victoria Manning ,&nbsp;Frank P. Deane ,&nbsp;Amanda L. Baker ,&nbsp;Leanne Hides ,&nbsp;Anthony Shakeshaft ,&nbsp;Angela Argent ,&nbsp;Peter J. Kelly","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Improving support options for people who use methamphetamine is of critical national and global importance. The role of mutual-help groups within the treatment-seeking journey of people who use methamphetamine is unclear. Self-Management and Recovery Training (‘SMART Recovery’) mutual-help groups are led by a trained facilitator and support participants to work on individual goals, including, but not limited to abstinence. This study examined how people who use methamphetamine came to be involved in SMART Recovery mutual-help groups and factors associated with engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sample of Australian SMART Recovery participants who self-reported using methamphetamine in the preceding 12-months (n = 18) discussed their history of substance use and experience of service provision in a semi-structured telephone interview. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using iterative categorization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participant initiation of SMART Recovery groups was described across two themes: i) delayed attendance and ii) use as an adjunct to other services. Factors associated with engagement were discussed in terms of: i) the ‘fit’ of SMART Recovery mutual-help groups; ii) coping and tolerance of discomfort; iii) the power of shared lived experience; iv) choice and autonomy; and v) short-term goal setting supports self-efficacy and the possibility of change.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><div>SMART Recovery mutual-help groups show promise for engaging people who use methamphetamine. There is a clear need to improve awareness of mutual-help group options amongst service users, providers and the general community. Offering choice over mutual-help groups may help to engage people earlier and support improved linkage between services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 209570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Improving support options for people who use methamphetamine is of critical national and global importance. The role of mutual-help groups within the treatment-seeking journey of people who use methamphetamine is unclear. Self-Management and Recovery Training (‘SMART Recovery’) mutual-help groups are led by a trained facilitator and support participants to work on individual goals, including, but not limited to abstinence. This study examined how people who use methamphetamine came to be involved in SMART Recovery mutual-help groups and factors associated with engagement.

Methods

A sample of Australian SMART Recovery participants who self-reported using methamphetamine in the preceding 12-months (n = 18) discussed their history of substance use and experience of service provision in a semi-structured telephone interview. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using iterative categorization.

Results

Participant initiation of SMART Recovery groups was described across two themes: i) delayed attendance and ii) use as an adjunct to other services. Factors associated with engagement were discussed in terms of: i) the ‘fit’ of SMART Recovery mutual-help groups; ii) coping and tolerance of discomfort; iii) the power of shared lived experience; iv) choice and autonomy; and v) short-term goal setting supports self-efficacy and the possibility of change.

Discussion and conclusions

SMART Recovery mutual-help groups show promise for engaging people who use methamphetamine. There is a clear need to improve awareness of mutual-help group options amongst service users, providers and the general community. Offering choice over mutual-help groups may help to engage people earlier and support improved linkage between services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索自我管理和康复培训(SMART Recovery)互助小组支持甲基苯丙胺吸食者的潜力:一项定性研究,考察参与者的启动和参与体验。
导言:改善对甲基苯丙胺吸食者的支持方案对国家和全球都至关重要。互助小组在甲基苯丙胺吸食者寻求治疗过程中的作用尚不明确。自我管理与康复培训("SMART康复")互助小组由训练有素的主持人领导,支持参与者努力实现个人目标,包括但不限于戒毒。本研究探讨了吸食甲基苯丙胺的人如何参与 SMART 康复互助小组以及与参与相关的因素:抽样调查了澳大利亚的 SMART Recovery 参与者(n = 18),他们自称在之前的 12 个月内吸食过甲基苯丙胺,并在半结构化电话访谈中讨论了他们的药物使用史和获得服务的经历。对访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用迭代分类法进行了分析:结果:SMART 康复小组的参与者参与情况分为两个主题:i) 延迟参与;ii) 作为其他服务的辅助手段。讨论与参与相关的因素包括:i) SMART 恢复互助小组的 "适合性";ii) 应对和容忍不适;iii) 共同生活经验的力量;iv) 选择和自主;v) 短期目标设定支持自我效能感和改变的可能性:SMART 康复互助小组在吸引甲基苯丙胺吸食者参与方面显示出前景。显然需要提高服务使用者、提供者和普通社区对互助小组选择的认识。提供对互助小组的选择可能有助于让人们更早地参与进来,并支持改进服务之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study exploring the feasibility and acceptability of embedding an overdose prevention sites in a U.S. hospital. The first five years of implementing Missouri's medication first approach to opioid use disorder treatment: Plateaus, regressions, and underbellies of progress. Implementation science in higher education: Identifying key determinants in the selection of evidence-based alcohol and substance prevention and treatment. Classes of outpatient quality of care among individuals with substance-related disorders, based on a survey and health insurance registry. Description of implementing a mail-based overdose education and naloxone distribution program in community supervision settings during COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1