Development and implementation of a brachytherapy procedure scoring system to optimize clinic and physics staffing schedule: A retrospective study of a single institution with a busy brachytherapy program.

Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.007
Arjit Baghwala, Chengfeng Li, Devin Olek, Forrest Ivey, Ramiro Pino, Andrew Farach
{"title":"Development and implementation of a brachytherapy procedure scoring system to optimize clinic and physics staffing schedule: A retrospective study of a single institution with a busy brachytherapy program.","authors":"Arjit Baghwala, Chengfeng Li, Devin Olek, Forrest Ivey, Ramiro Pino, Andrew Farach","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Brachytherapy (BT) is a time and resource intensive treatment modality. Constraints to efficiency and throughput include resource, staff and physician availability. Herein, we introduce a daily BT procedure scorecard, designed to ensure adequate resource allocation based on the type of procedure(s) being performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on BT procedures, number of fractions, number of patients, and the average daily caseload from 2021 to 2024 in our clinic were collected. Each BT procedure was assigned a score from 1 to 3 based on complexity and labor intensity, with 1 representing the least and 3 the most complex procedures. This data was then used to evaluate the efficiency of the BT scoring system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementing the BT scorecard improved scheduling efficiency without compromising patient throughput. Despite the growth in case complexity, we demonstrated that the scoring system effectively prevents understaffing in our clinics. The goal is to limit the daily BT score to 10 per day when creating the schedule, ensuring balanced resource allocation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strategies presented can enhance scheduling by ensuring an equitable workload distribution based on the BT schedule. These approaches should be considered in all high-volume BT clinics to optimize patient scheduling and throughput. Additionally, the scoring system allows clinics to develop full-time equivalent (FTE) staffing models that account for patient volume and case types, ensuring optimal resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":" ","pages":"190-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Brachytherapy (BT) is a time and resource intensive treatment modality. Constraints to efficiency and throughput include resource, staff and physician availability. Herein, we introduce a daily BT procedure scorecard, designed to ensure adequate resource allocation based on the type of procedure(s) being performed.

Methods: Data on BT procedures, number of fractions, number of patients, and the average daily caseload from 2021 to 2024 in our clinic were collected. Each BT procedure was assigned a score from 1 to 3 based on complexity and labor intensity, with 1 representing the least and 3 the most complex procedures. This data was then used to evaluate the efficiency of the BT scoring system.

Results: Implementing the BT scorecard improved scheduling efficiency without compromising patient throughput. Despite the growth in case complexity, we demonstrated that the scoring system effectively prevents understaffing in our clinics. The goal is to limit the daily BT score to 10 per day when creating the schedule, ensuring balanced resource allocation.

Conclusion: The strategies presented can enhance scheduling by ensuring an equitable workload distribution based on the BT schedule. These approaches should be considered in all high-volume BT clinics to optimize patient scheduling and throughput. Additionally, the scoring system allows clinics to develop full-time equivalent (FTE) staffing models that account for patient volume and case types, ensuring optimal resource utilization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并实施近距离放射治疗程序评分系统,以优化门诊和物理科的人员安排:对一家近距离放射治疗项目繁忙的医疗机构的回顾性研究。
目的:近距离放射治疗(BT)是一种时间和资源密集型治疗方式。影响效率和吞吐量的因素包括资源、人员和医生的可用性。在此,我们介绍一种每日近距离放射治疗程序记分卡,旨在确保根据正在进行的程序类型分配足够的资源:方法:我们收集了本诊所 2021 年至 2024 年期间的 BT 手术数据、碎石数量、患者数量和日均工作量。根据复杂程度和劳动强度,对每项 BT 手术进行 1 到 3 分的评分,1 分代表最不复杂的手术,3 分代表最复杂的手术。然后利用这些数据来评估 BT 评分系统的效率:结果:实施 BT 评分卡提高了排班效率,同时也不影响病人的吞吐量。尽管病例复杂程度有所提高,但我们仍证明了评分系统能有效防止诊所人手不足。我们的目标是在制定排班计划时将每天的 BT 分数限制在 10 分以内,以确保资源分配的平衡:结论:所提出的策略可以根据 BT 计划表确保工作量的公平分配,从而加强排班工作。所有工作量大的 BT 诊所都应考虑采用这些方法,以优化患者排班和吞吐量。此外,评分系统允许诊所根据患者数量和病例类型制定全职等效 (FTE) 人员配备模式,确保资源得到最佳利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From patient to pioneer: The inspiring journey of Dr. Brian Moran. Learning curve and proficiency assessment for gynecological brachytherapy amongst radiation oncology trainees in India: Results from a prospective study. A retrospective study on ruthenium-106 and strontium-90 eye-plaques treatment for retinoblastoma: 16-years clinical experience. The influence of time and implants in high-dose rate image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Early outcomes following local salvage treatment with MRI-assisted low-dose rate brachytherapy (MARS) for MRI-visible postsurgical bed recurrences and focal intraprostatic recurrences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1