[Cognitive function groups in older people and risk factors].

Jessica Camacho-Ruíz, Antonio V, Mario Enrique Rendón-Macías, Mariela Bernabe-García, Emmanuel González-Bautista, Leticia Manuel-Apolinar, Lourdes Basurto-Acevedo, Oscar Orihuela-Rodríguez, Juana M Ruiz-Batalla, Braulio Rojas-Rubio, Roberto A Olivares-Santos, Carlos Paredes-Manjarrez, Rosalinda Sánchez-Arenas
{"title":"[Cognitive function groups in older people and risk factors].","authors":"Jessica Camacho-Ruíz, Antonio V, Mario Enrique Rendón-Macías, Mariela Bernabe-García, Emmanuel González-Bautista, Leticia Manuel-Apolinar, Lourdes Basurto-Acevedo, Oscar Orihuela-Rodríguez, Juana M Ruiz-Batalla, Braulio Rojas-Rubio, Roberto A Olivares-Santos, Carlos Paredes-Manjarrez, Rosalinda Sánchez-Arenas","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10998801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk stratification for cognitive impairment in communities originated from autopsies in cognitively healthy individuals. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) incorporates subjective and objective cognitive function (CF) measures to explore neurocognitive disorders (NCD). It can be applied in communities to explore the factors that may influence positively or negatively.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To obtain the relationship between groups of CF classified using the DSM-5 categories, and sociodemographic factors, habits, comorbidities and motor function in older people living in the community.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study with a probabilistic sample (n = 347). The variables were sociodemographic, habits, comorbidities, and cognitive motor function. The participants were grouped considering subjective and objective CF, plus age, sex, and educational level, and defined according to NCD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>28.5% did not present cognitive disorder, 43.9% had mild disorder < 70 years (mildNCD < 70y), 19% with 70 years or more (mildNCD ≥ 70y), and with major disorder 8.6%. The associated factors for mildNCD < 70y were marital status (MS), physical activity (PA), diabetes mellitus, and frailty; for mildNCD > 70y: MS, occupation, living alone, and heart disease; for majorNCD: PA and grip strength. In the multivariate analysis it was observed greater likelihood in the mildNCD groups than in the non-NCD and majorNCD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>4 important groups were identified in a community. The mildNCD was mainly explained by sociodemographic factors, lifestyle, clinical conditions, and motor functionality.</p>","PeriodicalId":94200,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","volume":"62 3","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10998801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Risk stratification for cognitive impairment in communities originated from autopsies in cognitively healthy individuals. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) incorporates subjective and objective cognitive function (CF) measures to explore neurocognitive disorders (NCD). It can be applied in communities to explore the factors that may influence positively or negatively.

Objective: To obtain the relationship between groups of CF classified using the DSM-5 categories, and sociodemographic factors, habits, comorbidities and motor function in older people living in the community.

Material and methods: Cross-sectional study with a probabilistic sample (n = 347). The variables were sociodemographic, habits, comorbidities, and cognitive motor function. The participants were grouped considering subjective and objective CF, plus age, sex, and educational level, and defined according to NCD.

Results: 28.5% did not present cognitive disorder, 43.9% had mild disorder < 70 years (mildNCD < 70y), 19% with 70 years or more (mildNCD ≥ 70y), and with major disorder 8.6%. The associated factors for mildNCD < 70y were marital status (MS), physical activity (PA), diabetes mellitus, and frailty; for mildNCD > 70y: MS, occupation, living alone, and heart disease; for majorNCD: PA and grip strength. In the multivariate analysis it was observed greater likelihood in the mildNCD groups than in the non-NCD and majorNCD groups.

Conclusions: 4 important groups were identified in a community. The mildNCD was mainly explained by sociodemographic factors, lifestyle, clinical conditions, and motor functionality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[老年人的认知功能组别和风险因素]。
背景:社区认知障碍的风险分层源于对认知健康个体的尸检。精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第 5 版(DSM-5)纳入了主观和客观认知功能(CF)测量方法,以探讨神经认知障碍(NCD)。它可应用于社区,探索可能产生积极或消极影响的因素:材料与方法:横断面研究,采用概率样本(n = 347)。变量包括社会人口学、生活习惯、合并症和认知运动功能。结果:28.5%的人未出现认知障碍,43.9%的人轻度认知障碍<70岁(mildNCD <70y),19%的人70岁或以上(mildNCD ≥70y),重度认知障碍占8.6%。轻度 NCD < 70y 的相关因素是婚姻状况(MS)、体力活动(PA)、糖尿病和体弱;轻度 NCD > 70y 的相关因素是婚姻状况(MS)、职业、独居和体力活动(PA):轻度 NCD > 70y 的相关因素有:MS、职业、独居和心脏病;重度 NCD 的相关因素有:PA 和握力。在多变量分析中观察到,轻度 NCD 组比非 NCD 组和重度 NCD 组有更大的可能性:结论:在一个社区中发现了 4 个重要群体。结论:在一个社区中发现了 4 个重要组别,轻度 NCD 主要由社会人口因素、生活方式、临床状况和运动功能解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Epidemiology of childhood leukemia in Mexico and Latin America: Effects of vulnerability and social justice]. [Research trends on botulinum toxin A in bruxism: a bibliometric analysis]. [Narrative medicine as an educational tool]. [Medical Practice, Epidemiology, and Evidence-Based Medicine: A necessary triangle in healthcare]. [Wells Syndrome: Clinical Presentation and Literature Review].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1