Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using plasma biomarkers adjusted to clinical probability

IF 17 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY Nature aging Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1038/s43587-024-00731-y
Joseph Therriault, Shorena Janelidze, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Nicholas J. Ashton, Javier Arranz Martínez, Armand Gonzalez-Escalante, Bruna Bellaver, Daniel Alcolea, Agathe Vrillon, Helmet Karim, Michelle M. Mielke, Chang Hyung Hong, Hyun Woong Roh, José Contador, Albert Puig Pijoan, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Prashanthi Vemuri, Jonathan Graff-Radford, Val J. Lowe, Thomas K. Karikari, Erin Jonaitis, Wagner Brum, Cécile Tissot, Stijn Servaes, Nesrine Rahmouni, Arthur C. Macedo, Jenna Stevenson, Jaime Fernandez-Arias, Yi-Ting Wang, Marcel S. Woo, Manuel A. Friese, Wan Lu Jia, Julien Dumurgier, Claire Hourregue, Emmanuel Cognat, Pamela Lukasewicz Ferreira, Paolo Vitali, Sterling Johnson, Tharick A. Pascoal, Serge Gauthier, Alberto Lleó, Claire Paquet, Ronald C. Petersen, David Salmon, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren, Sebastian Palmqvist, Erik Stomrud, Douglas Galasko, Sang Joon Son, Henrik Zetterberg, Juan Fortea, Marc Suárez-Calvet, Clifford R. Jack Jr, Kaj Blennow, Oskar Hansson, Pedro Rosa-Neto
{"title":"Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using plasma biomarkers adjusted to clinical probability","authors":"Joseph Therriault, Shorena Janelidze, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Nicholas J. Ashton, Javier Arranz Martínez, Armand Gonzalez-Escalante, Bruna Bellaver, Daniel Alcolea, Agathe Vrillon, Helmet Karim, Michelle M. Mielke, Chang Hyung Hong, Hyun Woong Roh, José Contador, Albert Puig Pijoan, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Prashanthi Vemuri, Jonathan Graff-Radford, Val J. Lowe, Thomas K. Karikari, Erin Jonaitis, Wagner Brum, Cécile Tissot, Stijn Servaes, Nesrine Rahmouni, Arthur C. Macedo, Jenna Stevenson, Jaime Fernandez-Arias, Yi-Ting Wang, Marcel S. Woo, Manuel A. Friese, Wan Lu Jia, Julien Dumurgier, Claire Hourregue, Emmanuel Cognat, Pamela Lukasewicz Ferreira, Paolo Vitali, Sterling Johnson, Tharick A. Pascoal, Serge Gauthier, Alberto Lleó, Claire Paquet, Ronald C. Petersen, David Salmon, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren, Sebastian Palmqvist, Erik Stomrud, Douglas Galasko, Sang Joon Son, Henrik Zetterberg, Juan Fortea, Marc Suárez-Calvet, Clifford R. Jack Jr, Kaj Blennow, Oskar Hansson, Pedro Rosa-Neto","doi":"10.1038/s43587-024-00731-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently approved anti-amyloid immunotherapies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) require evidence of amyloid-β pathology from positron emission tomography (PET) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) before initiating treatment. Blood-based biomarkers promise to reduce the need for PET or CSF testing; however, their interpretation at the individual level and the circumstances requiring confirmatory testing are poorly understood. Individual-level interpretation of diagnostic test results requires knowledge of disease prevalence in relation to clinical presentation (clinical pretest probability). Here, in a study of 6,896 individuals evaluated from 11 cohort studies from six countries, we determined the positive and negative predictive value of five plasma biomarkers for amyloid-β pathology in cognitively impaired individuals in relation to clinical pretest probability. We observed that p-tau217 could rule in amyloid-β pathology in individuals with probable AD dementia (positive predictive value above 95%). In mild cognitive impairment, p-tau217 interpretation depended on patient age. Negative p-tau217 results could rule out amyloid-β pathology in individuals with non-AD dementia syndromes (negative predictive value between 90% and 99%). Our findings provide a framework for the individual-level interpretation of plasma biomarkers, suggesting that p-tau217 combined with clinical phenotyping can identify patients where amyloid-β pathology can be ruled in or out without the need for PET or CSF confirmatory testing. Therriault et al. provide a framework for the individual-level interpretation of plasma biomarkers by determining their positive and negative predictive values for amyloid positron emission tomography status in relation to patient age and clinical symptoms.","PeriodicalId":94150,"journal":{"name":"Nature aging","volume":"4 11","pages":"1529-1537"},"PeriodicalIF":17.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-024-00731-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-024-00731-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently approved anti-amyloid immunotherapies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) require evidence of amyloid-β pathology from positron emission tomography (PET) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) before initiating treatment. Blood-based biomarkers promise to reduce the need for PET or CSF testing; however, their interpretation at the individual level and the circumstances requiring confirmatory testing are poorly understood. Individual-level interpretation of diagnostic test results requires knowledge of disease prevalence in relation to clinical presentation (clinical pretest probability). Here, in a study of 6,896 individuals evaluated from 11 cohort studies from six countries, we determined the positive and negative predictive value of five plasma biomarkers for amyloid-β pathology in cognitively impaired individuals in relation to clinical pretest probability. We observed that p-tau217 could rule in amyloid-β pathology in individuals with probable AD dementia (positive predictive value above 95%). In mild cognitive impairment, p-tau217 interpretation depended on patient age. Negative p-tau217 results could rule out amyloid-β pathology in individuals with non-AD dementia syndromes (negative predictive value between 90% and 99%). Our findings provide a framework for the individual-level interpretation of plasma biomarkers, suggesting that p-tau217 combined with clinical phenotyping can identify patients where amyloid-β pathology can be ruled in or out without the need for PET or CSF confirmatory testing. Therriault et al. provide a framework for the individual-level interpretation of plasma biomarkers by determining their positive and negative predictive values for amyloid positron emission tomography status in relation to patient age and clinical symptoms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用根据临床概率调整的血浆生物标志物诊断阿尔茨海默病。
最近获批的阿尔茨海默病(AD)抗淀粉样蛋白免疫疗法要求在开始治疗前通过正电子发射断层扫描(PET)或脑脊液(CSF)获得淀粉样蛋白-β病理学证据。以血液为基础的生物标志物有望减少正电子发射断层扫描或脑脊液检测的需求;然而,人们对这些生物标志物在个体层面的解释以及需要进行确证检测的情况还知之甚少。对诊断检测结果进行个体层面的解读需要了解与临床表现(临床检测前概率)相关的疾病患病率。在此,我们对来自 6 个国家 11 项队列研究的 6896 名患者进行了评估,确定了认知障碍患者血浆中五种淀粉样蛋白-β病理生物标志物的阳性和阴性预测值与临床检测前概率的关系。我们观察到,p-tau217 可以排除可能患有 AD 痴呆症的人体内的淀粉样蛋白-β病理变化(阳性预测值高于 95%)。在轻度认知障碍患者中,p-tau217 的解释取决于患者的年龄。p-tau217阴性结果可排除非AD痴呆综合征患者的淀粉样蛋白-β病理(阴性预测值在90%至99%之间)。我们的研究结果为血浆生物标记物的个体水平解释提供了一个框架,表明p-tau217与临床表型相结合可以确定哪些患者可以排除淀粉样蛋白-β病理,而无需进行PET或CSF确证检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of nicotinamide riboside on airway inflammation in COPD: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Reactivation of senescence-associated endogenous retroviruses by ATF3 drives interferon signaling in aging. Brain-wide alterations revealed by spatial transcriptomics and proteomics in COVID-19 infection Clearance of p21 highly expressing senescent cells accelerates cutaneous wound healing. Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using plasma biomarkers adjusted to clinical probability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1