Score-based likelihood ratios for barefootprint evidence using deep learning features.

Yi Yang BEng, Yunqi Tang, Junjian Cui MEng, Xiaorui Zhao MEng
{"title":"Score-based likelihood ratios for barefootprint evidence using deep learning features.","authors":"Yi Yang BEng, Yunqi Tang, Junjian Cui MEng, Xiaorui Zhao MEng","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the court put forward higher requirements for quantitative evaluation and scientific standards of forensic evidence, how to objectively and scientifically express identification opinions has become a challenge for traditional forensic identification methods. Score-based likelihood ratios are mathematical methods for quantitative evaluation of forensic evidence. However, due to the subtle differences in inter-class barefootprints, there is no automatic barefootprints matching algorithm with high accuracy under large-scale dataset validation, and there are few studies related to deep learning barefootprint features for evidence evaluation in court. Therefore, score-based likelihood ratios for barefootprint evidence using deep learning features are proposed by this paper. Firstly, the largest barefootprint dataset (BFD) is constructed, which contains 54,118 barefootprint images from 3000 individuals. Then, an automatic barefootprint feature extraction and matching algorithm is proposed, which achieves a retrieval accuracy of 98.4% on BFD and an AUC of 0.989 for barefootprint validation. Next, Cosine distance, Euclidean distance and Manhattan distance are employed to measure the comparison scores between intra-class and inter-class barefootprints using deep learning features in four dimensions of 64, 128, 512 and 1024, respectively. The performance of proposed model is evaluated by comparing the <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>C</mi> <mi>llr</mi></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {C}_{llr} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> values and the Tippett plot. Finally, simulated crime scene barefootprint samples are constructed to verify the practical application of the proposed method, which provide further support for the quantitative evaluation of barefootprint evidence in court.</p>","PeriodicalId":94080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the court put forward higher requirements for quantitative evaluation and scientific standards of forensic evidence, how to objectively and scientifically express identification opinions has become a challenge for traditional forensic identification methods. Score-based likelihood ratios are mathematical methods for quantitative evaluation of forensic evidence. However, due to the subtle differences in inter-class barefootprints, there is no automatic barefootprints matching algorithm with high accuracy under large-scale dataset validation, and there are few studies related to deep learning barefootprint features for evidence evaluation in court. Therefore, score-based likelihood ratios for barefootprint evidence using deep learning features are proposed by this paper. Firstly, the largest barefootprint dataset (BFD) is constructed, which contains 54,118 barefootprint images from 3000 individuals. Then, an automatic barefootprint feature extraction and matching algorithm is proposed, which achieves a retrieval accuracy of 98.4% on BFD and an AUC of 0.989 for barefootprint validation. Next, Cosine distance, Euclidean distance and Manhattan distance are employed to measure the comparison scores between intra-class and inter-class barefootprints using deep learning features in four dimensions of 64, 128, 512 and 1024, respectively. The performance of proposed model is evaluated by comparing the C llr $$ {C}_{llr} $$ values and the Tippett plot. Finally, simulated crime scene barefootprint samples are constructed to verify the practical application of the proposed method, which provide further support for the quantitative evaluation of barefootprint evidence in court.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用深度学习特征对赤足印证据进行基于分数的似然比分析。
随着法院对法医证据的量化评价和科学标准提出了更高的要求,如何客观、科学地表达鉴定意见成为传统法医鉴定方法面临的挑战。基于分数的似然比是对法医证据进行量化评价的数学方法。然而,由于类间赤足印的细微差别,目前还没有大规模数据集验证下准确率较高的自动赤足印匹配算法,而深度学习赤足印特征用于法庭证据评估的相关研究也很少。因此,本文提出了利用深度学习特征对赤足印证据进行基于评分的似然比分析。首先,构建了最大的赤足印数据集(BFD),该数据集包含来自 3000 个个体的 54118 张赤足印图像。然后,提出了一种自动光脚印特征提取和匹配算法,该算法在 BFD 上的检索准确率达到 98.4%,光脚印验证的 AUC 为 0.989。接下来,利用深度学习特征,在 64、128、512 和 1024 四个维度上分别采用余弦距离、欧氏距离和曼哈顿距离来测量类内和类间光脚印的比较得分。通过比较 C llr $$ {C}_{llr} $$ 值和 Tippett 图,评估了拟议模型的性能。最后,构建了模拟犯罪现场的赤足印样本,验证了所提方法的实际应用,为法庭对赤足印证据的定量评估提供了进一步支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serial killer and necrophilia: Report of twenty-five years of treatment and management in a rare case. Genital lacerations following sexual assault and consensual sexual intercourse: A systematic review and meta-analysis. A statistical analysis for deepfake videos forgery traces recognition followed by a fine-tuned InceptionResNetV2 detection technique. Significance of image brightness levels for PRNU camera identification. A Bayesian approach to Suchey-Brooks age estimation from the pubic symphysis using modern American samples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1