Comparison Queries Generation Using Mathematical Programming for Exploratory Data Analysis

IF 8.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1109/TKDE.2024.3474828
Alexandre Chanson;Nicolas Labroche;Patrick Marcel;Vincent T'Kindt
{"title":"Comparison Queries Generation Using Mathematical Programming for Exploratory Data Analysis","authors":"Alexandre Chanson;Nicolas Labroche;Patrick Marcel;Vincent T'Kindt","doi":"10.1109/TKDE.2024.3474828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) is the interactive process of gaining insights from a dataset. Comparisons are popular insights that can be specified with comparison queries, i.e., specifications of the comparison of subsets of data. In this work, we consider the problem of automatically computing sequences of comparison queries that are coherent, significant and whose overall cost is bounded. Such an automation is usually done by either generating all insights and solving a multi-criteria optimization problem, or using reinforcement learning. In the first case, a large search space has to be explored using exponential algorithms or dedicated heuristics. In the second case, a dataset-specific, time and energy-consuming training, is necessary. We contribute with a novel approach, consisting of decomposing the optimization problem in two: the original problem, that is solved over a smaller search space, and a new problem of generating comparison queries, aiming at generating only queries improving existing solutions of the first problem. This allows to explore only a portion of the search space, without resorting to reinforcement learning. We show that this approach is effective, in that it finds good solutions to the original multi-criteria optimization problem, and efficient, allowing to generate sequences of comparisons in reasonable time.","PeriodicalId":13496,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering","volume":"36 12","pages":"7792-7804"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10705999/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) is the interactive process of gaining insights from a dataset. Comparisons are popular insights that can be specified with comparison queries, i.e., specifications of the comparison of subsets of data. In this work, we consider the problem of automatically computing sequences of comparison queries that are coherent, significant and whose overall cost is bounded. Such an automation is usually done by either generating all insights and solving a multi-criteria optimization problem, or using reinforcement learning. In the first case, a large search space has to be explored using exponential algorithms or dedicated heuristics. In the second case, a dataset-specific, time and energy-consuming training, is necessary. We contribute with a novel approach, consisting of decomposing the optimization problem in two: the original problem, that is solved over a smaller search space, and a new problem of generating comparison queries, aiming at generating only queries improving existing solutions of the first problem. This allows to explore only a portion of the search space, without resorting to reinforcement learning. We show that this approach is effective, in that it finds good solutions to the original multi-criteria optimization problem, and efficient, allowing to generate sequences of comparisons in reasonable time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用数学编程生成比较查询,用于探索性数据分析
探索性数据分析(EDA)是从数据集中获取见解的互动过程。比较是一种流行的见解,可以通过比较查询(即数据子集的比较说明)来指定。在这项工作中,我们考虑的问题是自动计算连贯、重要且总体成本有界的比较查询序列。这种自动化通常是通过生成所有洞察力并解决多标准优化问题或使用强化学习来实现的。在第一种情况下,必须使用指数算法或专门的启发式方法来探索一个巨大的搜索空间。在第二种情况下,则需要针对特定数据集进行耗时耗力的训练。我们提出了一种新方法,将优化问题一分为二:一个是在较小搜索空间内求解的原始问题,另一个是生成比较查询的新问题,目的是只生成改进第一个问题现有解决方案的查询。这样就可以只探索搜索空间的一部分,而无需借助强化学习。我们证明这种方法是有效的,因为它能为原始的多标准优化问题找到好的解决方案,而且效率很高,能在合理的时间内生成比较序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
515
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering encompasses knowledge and data engineering aspects within computer science, artificial intelligence, electrical engineering, computer engineering, and related fields. It provides an interdisciplinary platform for disseminating new developments in knowledge and data engineering and explores the practicality of these concepts in both hardware and software. Specific areas covered include knowledge-based and expert systems, AI techniques for knowledge and data management, tools, and methodologies, distributed processing, real-time systems, architectures, data management practices, database design, query languages, security, fault tolerance, statistical databases, algorithms, performance evaluation, and applications.
期刊最新文献
SE Factual Knowledge in Frozen Giant Code Model: A Study on FQN and Its Retrieval Online Dynamic Hybrid Broad Learning System for Real-Time Safety Assessment of Dynamic Systems Iterative Soft Prompt-Tuning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation A Derivative Topic Dissemination Model Based on Representation Learning and Topic Relevance L-ASCRA: A Linearithmic Time Approximate Spectral Clustering Algorithm Using Topologically-Preserved Representatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1