Where Are They Now? Attrition Rates of Emergency Medicine Residency Graduates by Gender.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Annals of emergency medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.09.017
Nikita A Salker, Andrea Fang, Michelle Lall, Michael Bond, Melissa White, Pooja Agrawal, Kinjal N Sethuraman
{"title":"Where Are They Now? Attrition Rates of Emergency Medicine Residency Graduates by Gender.","authors":"Nikita A Salker, Andrea Fang, Michelle Lall, Michael Bond, Melissa White, Pooja Agrawal, Kinjal N Sethuraman","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>Prior studies examined the retention of women emergency physicians through residency training, but their career paths on completing residency are less well understood. Our primary objective was to identify a difference in attrition rates between binary genders of practicing clinical emergency physicians within 10 to 30 years after residency graduation. Our secondary aims investigated gender differences in geographic practice location, academic, and community practice. We hypothesized that women emergency physicians have higher rates of attrition from clinical practice than men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cohort study, we tracked employment over 10 to 30 years of graduates from allopathic emergency medicine residency programs established before 2005 and those who graduated before 2010. We obtained graduate lists from 21 residency programs representing geographically diverse training programs in the United States. We utilized public databases to investigate current licensure, board certification, practice location, and occupation for graduates more than 10 years after residency graduation. Physicians who do not practice clinically in emergency medicine or an emergency medicine subspecialty were placed in the \"attrition\" category. \"Not available\" was defined as those individuals who did not have adequate information available online. We analyzed differences in attrition of women and men emergency physicians in clinical practice in 2020. We also noted whether they worked in an academic or community setting and assessed their geographic clinical practice region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 4,170 graduates. Of those, 445 (10.6%) were excluded because of insufficient information. Of the 3,725 emergency medicine residency graduates, 71% were men. The attrition rate from clinical emergency medicine for men was 5.3% (95% confidence interval, 4.4% to 6.1%) and the attrition rate for women was 5.8% (95% confidence interval, 4.4% to 7.2%). The difference between the 2 proportions was -0.005 (95% confidence interval, -0.02 to 0.01). There were no gender differences in geographic location or practice type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not observe differences in attrition rates by gender in our sample from 21 programs over a 30-year period. The findings from this cohort are disparate from reports of recent emergency medicine graduates and identifying reasons for attrition of emergency physicians will be important to understanding the workforce needs of the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.09.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: Prior studies examined the retention of women emergency physicians through residency training, but their career paths on completing residency are less well understood. Our primary objective was to identify a difference in attrition rates between binary genders of practicing clinical emergency physicians within 10 to 30 years after residency graduation. Our secondary aims investigated gender differences in geographic practice location, academic, and community practice. We hypothesized that women emergency physicians have higher rates of attrition from clinical practice than men.

Methods: In this cohort study, we tracked employment over 10 to 30 years of graduates from allopathic emergency medicine residency programs established before 2005 and those who graduated before 2010. We obtained graduate lists from 21 residency programs representing geographically diverse training programs in the United States. We utilized public databases to investigate current licensure, board certification, practice location, and occupation for graduates more than 10 years after residency graduation. Physicians who do not practice clinically in emergency medicine or an emergency medicine subspecialty were placed in the "attrition" category. "Not available" was defined as those individuals who did not have adequate information available online. We analyzed differences in attrition of women and men emergency physicians in clinical practice in 2020. We also noted whether they worked in an academic or community setting and assessed their geographic clinical practice region.

Results: We identified a total of 4,170 graduates. Of those, 445 (10.6%) were excluded because of insufficient information. Of the 3,725 emergency medicine residency graduates, 71% were men. The attrition rate from clinical emergency medicine for men was 5.3% (95% confidence interval, 4.4% to 6.1%) and the attrition rate for women was 5.8% (95% confidence interval, 4.4% to 7.2%). The difference between the 2 proportions was -0.005 (95% confidence interval, -0.02 to 0.01). There were no gender differences in geographic location or practice type.

Conclusion: We did not observe differences in attrition rates by gender in our sample from 21 programs over a 30-year period. The findings from this cohort are disparate from reports of recent emergency medicine graduates and identifying reasons for attrition of emergency physicians will be important to understanding the workforce needs of the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他们现在在哪里?按性别分列的急诊科住院医生毕业生流失率。
研究目的:之前的研究探讨了女性急诊医生在住院医师培训期间的留用情况,但对她们在完成住院医师培训后的职业发展路径了解较少。我们的首要目标是确定临床急诊医师在住院医师培训毕业后 10 至 30 年内的二元性别自然减员率差异。我们的次要目标是调查实习地点、学术和社区实习方面的性别差异。我们假设,女性急诊医师的临床实践自然减员率高于男性:在这项队列研究中,我们对 2005 年前成立的全科急诊医学住院医师培训项目的毕业生和 2010 年前毕业的毕业生进行了 10 至 30 年的就业跟踪。我们从 21 个住院医师培训项目中获得了毕业生名单,这些项目代表了美国不同地域的培训项目。我们利用公共数据库调查了住院医师培训毕业 10 年以上的毕业生目前的执照、委员会认证、执业地点和职业。没有在急诊医学或急诊医学亚专科临床实践的医生被归入 "自然减员 "类别。"无法在线 "指的是那些无法在线获得足够信息的个人。我们分析了 2020 年临床实践中男女急诊医师自然减员的差异。我们还注意到他们是在学术环境还是社区环境中工作,并评估了他们的临床实践地理区域:我们共确定了 4,170 名毕业生。结果:我们共确定了 4,170 名毕业生,其中 445 人(10.6%)因信息不足而被排除在外。在 3725 名急诊医学住院医师毕业生中,71% 为男性。临床急诊医学专业的男性自然减员率为 5.3%(95% 置信区间为 4.4% 到 6.1%),女性自然减员率为 5.8%(95% 置信区间为 4.4% 到 7.2%)。两个比例之间的差异为-0.005(95% 置信区间,-0.02 至 0.01)。在地理位置或实践类型方面没有性别差异:我们从 21 个项目的样本中观察到,在 30 年的时间里,不同性别的自然减员率没有差异。该群体的研究结果与近期急诊医学毕业生的报告不同,确定急诊医生流失的原因对于了解未来的劳动力需求非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness of Implementation Facilitation to Promote Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder. Enhancing Emergency Department Triage Equity With Artificial Intelligence: Outcomes From a Multisite Implementation. Managing Acute Respiratory Failure With Facemask Noninvasive Ventilation. Cephalosporins for Outpatient Pyelonephritis in the Emergency Department: COPY-ED Study. Comparison of Early and Late Norepinephrine Administration in Patients With Septic Shock.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1