{"title":"Evaluation of the COVID-19 diagnostic performance of Rapiim SARS-CoV-2-H, the highly sensitive SARS-CoV-2 antigen qualitative test kit","authors":"Nobumasa Okumura , Hideaki Kato , Kei Yamamoto , Eri Hagiwara , Masami Kurokawa , Sayaka Hikida , Taketomo Maruki , Kazuhisa Mezaki , Katsushi Tanaka , Takashi Ogura , Norio Ohmagari","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We evaluated the diagnostic performance of Rapiim SARS-CoV-2-H (Rapiim-H)—a point-of-care qualitative antigen test—using nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and saliva samples and compared its results with those from antigen quantification and nucleic acid amplification tests. NPS and saliva were collected from patients with confirmed and suspected coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In total, 142 NPS and saliva samples were collected. In symptomatic cases, in which the first NPS sample was collected within 10 days of disease onset, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for COVID-19 diagnosis were 91.7 %, 88.6 %, 93.2 %, and 86.1 %, respectively. A similar analysis was performed on saliva samples, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 50.8 %, 91.4 %, 91.2 %, and 51.6 %, respectively. The Rapiim-H test using NPS demonstrated approximately 90 % sensitivity and specificity, particularly within the first 10 days after disease onset.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"111 1","pages":"Article 116598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073288932400422X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We evaluated the diagnostic performance of Rapiim SARS-CoV-2-H (Rapiim-H)—a point-of-care qualitative antigen test—using nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and saliva samples and compared its results with those from antigen quantification and nucleic acid amplification tests. NPS and saliva were collected from patients with confirmed and suspected coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In total, 142 NPS and saliva samples were collected. In symptomatic cases, in which the first NPS sample was collected within 10 days of disease onset, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for COVID-19 diagnosis were 91.7 %, 88.6 %, 93.2 %, and 86.1 %, respectively. A similar analysis was performed on saliva samples, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 50.8 %, 91.4 %, 91.2 %, and 51.6 %, respectively. The Rapiim-H test using NPS demonstrated approximately 90 % sensitivity and specificity, particularly within the first 10 days after disease onset.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.