The efficacy of immediate lymphatic reconstruction after axillary lymph node dissection – A meta-analysis

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109377
Allen Wei-Jiat Wong , Nadia Hui Shan Sim , Stella Jinran Zhan , Jung-Ju Huang
{"title":"The efficacy of immediate lymphatic reconstruction after axillary lymph node dissection – A meta-analysis","authors":"Allen Wei-Jiat Wong ,&nbsp;Nadia Hui Shan Sim ,&nbsp;Stella Jinran Zhan ,&nbsp;Jung-Ju Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common complication following mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Patients with BCRL are often fraught with restricted mobility of the upper limb and higher risk of infections which negatively impact their quality of life. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has gained popularity in recent years due to its positive results in lowering BCRL rates. The objective of this study is to summarize evidence from the current available literature on the efficacy of ILR in preventing BCRL following ALND. A comprehensive search across PubMed and Web of Science was conducted. Studies involving ILR performed at the time of ALND for breast cancer were included. Exclusion criteria included secondary lymphatic reconstruction for established BCRL, literature reviews, animal studies, case reports and studies detailing surgical technique. To evaluate the efficacy of ILR, only studies with both intervention groups (ILR) and control groups were included. A systematic search yielded data from 10 studies and 1487 breast cancer patients who underwent ALND at the time of surgery. Meta-analysis revealed that in the ILR group, 50 of 637 (7.85 %) patients developed BCRL whereas in the control group, 177 of 850 patients (20.8 %) developed BCRL. Patients treated with ILR in this analysis had a relative risk of 0.31 (95 % CI, 0.19 to 0.51) for developing BCRL when compared to the controls (p &lt; 0.0001). ILR decreases the risk of developing lymphedema following ALND for breast cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 1","pages":"Article 109377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798324014458","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common complication following mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Patients with BCRL are often fraught with restricted mobility of the upper limb and higher risk of infections which negatively impact their quality of life. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has gained popularity in recent years due to its positive results in lowering BCRL rates. The objective of this study is to summarize evidence from the current available literature on the efficacy of ILR in preventing BCRL following ALND. A comprehensive search across PubMed and Web of Science was conducted. Studies involving ILR performed at the time of ALND for breast cancer were included. Exclusion criteria included secondary lymphatic reconstruction for established BCRL, literature reviews, animal studies, case reports and studies detailing surgical technique. To evaluate the efficacy of ILR, only studies with both intervention groups (ILR) and control groups were included. A systematic search yielded data from 10 studies and 1487 breast cancer patients who underwent ALND at the time of surgery. Meta-analysis revealed that in the ILR group, 50 of 637 (7.85 %) patients developed BCRL whereas in the control group, 177 of 850 patients (20.8 %) developed BCRL. Patients treated with ILR in this analysis had a relative risk of 0.31 (95 % CI, 0.19 to 0.51) for developing BCRL when compared to the controls (p < 0.0001). ILR decreases the risk of developing lymphedema following ALND for breast cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腋窝淋巴结清扫术后立即进行淋巴重建的疗效 - 一项荟萃分析。
乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)是乳房切除术和腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)后常见的并发症。淋巴水肿患者通常上肢活动受限,感染风险较高,对生活质量造成负面影响。近年来,即时淋巴重建术(ILR)在降低 BCRL 发生率方面取得了积极的效果,因此受到越来越多人的青睐。本研究旨在总结现有文献中有关 ILR 在预防 ALND 后 BCRL 方面疗效的证据。我们在 PubMed 和 Web of Science 上进行了全面搜索。纳入了在乳腺癌 ALND 时进行 ILR 的研究。排除标准包括对已确诊的 BCRL 进行二次淋巴重建、文献综述、动物实验、病例报告以及详细介绍手术技术的研究。为了评估ILR的疗效,只纳入了干预组(ILR)和对照组的研究。通过系统性检索,共获得了 10 项研究和 1487 名乳腺癌患者的数据,这些患者在手术时接受了 ALND 治疗。Meta 分析显示,ILR 组 637 例患者中有 50 例(7.85%)出现 BCRL,而对照组 850 例患者中有 177 例(20.8%)出现 BCRL。在这项分析中,与对照组相比,接受 ILR 治疗的患者罹患 BCRL 的相对风险为 0.31(95 % CI,0.19 至 0.51)(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Response prediction for neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer patients-improvement in decision-making: A systematic review. The influence of treatment intervals on prognosis in young breast cancer patients: Insights from the French National cohort The efficacy of immediate lymphatic reconstruction after axillary lymph node dissection – A meta-analysis Establishment a nomogram model for preoperative prediction of the risk of cholangiocarcinoma with microvascular invasion Prognosis predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy following conversion therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1