Perspectives on Telemedicine Visits Reported by Patients With Cancer.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45363
Sahil D Doshi, Yasin Khadem Charvadeh, Kenneth Seier, Erin M Bange, Bobby Daly, Allison Lipitz-Snyderman, Fernanda C G Polubriaginof, Michael Buckley, Gilad Kuperman, Peter D Stetson, Deb Schrag, Michael J Morris, Katherine S Panageas
{"title":"Perspectives on Telemedicine Visits Reported by Patients With Cancer.","authors":"Sahil D Doshi, Yasin Khadem Charvadeh, Kenneth Seier, Erin M Bange, Bobby Daly, Allison Lipitz-Snyderman, Fernanda C G Polubriaginof, Michael Buckley, Gilad Kuperman, Peter D Stetson, Deb Schrag, Michael J Morris, Katherine S Panageas","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed rapid adoption of telemedicine visits for cancer care delivery. However, patients' experiences with telemedicine remain poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand patients' satisfaction with telemedicine visits at a comprehensive cancer center.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This survey study included patients with cancer at a US cancer center between 2020 and 2023. Eligible patients completed surveys in English conducted after their first telemedicine appointment via an online patient portal. Data were analyzed between January and June 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Patient surveys about telemedicine experiences, with a specific comparison with an in-person visit. Structured items elicited satisfaction with the specific visit, preferences for future use of telemedicine, and technical ease of use; unstructured free-text responses were also elicited.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Proportion of patients who indicated that telemedicine visits were superior or preferred to in-person visits. Secondary outcomes included multivariable analysis of barriers to telemedicine use and variations in patient experiences by demographic characteristics over the observation period, and free-text analysis of unstructured responses describing the telemedicine experience using the BERTopic algorithm and a language model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 435 telemedicine users completed surveys from May 2020 to October 2023 (median [IQR] age, 65 [55-72] years; 15 072 female [54.9%]; 1771 Asian [6.7%], 1339 Black [5.1%], 22 742 White [85.9%]). Overall, 18 025 of 24 418 patients (73.8%) rated their first telemedicine visit as good as or better than an in-person visit, and 4606 (18.9%) rated it superior to an in-person visit. The proportion of patients rating a telemedicine visit superior to an in-person visit evolved from 17% in 2020 to 20% in 2023. Structured questions revealed a positive view of telemedicine, while free-text analyses highlighted issues with technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this survey study of perspectives on telemedicine visits, a large majority of patients at a comprehensive cancer center expressed satisfaction with telemedicine visits in proportions that remained consistent beyond the end of the pandemic. These findings challenge health care systems to integrate telemedicine into routine cancer care and to overcome remaining technical challenges and barriers to ease of use.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2445363"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45363","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed rapid adoption of telemedicine visits for cancer care delivery. However, patients' experiences with telemedicine remain poorly understood.

Objective: To understand patients' satisfaction with telemedicine visits at a comprehensive cancer center.

Design, setting, and participants: This survey study included patients with cancer at a US cancer center between 2020 and 2023. Eligible patients completed surveys in English conducted after their first telemedicine appointment via an online patient portal. Data were analyzed between January and June 2024.

Exposures: Patient surveys about telemedicine experiences, with a specific comparison with an in-person visit. Structured items elicited satisfaction with the specific visit, preferences for future use of telemedicine, and technical ease of use; unstructured free-text responses were also elicited.

Main outcomes and measures: Proportion of patients who indicated that telemedicine visits were superior or preferred to in-person visits. Secondary outcomes included multivariable analysis of barriers to telemedicine use and variations in patient experiences by demographic characteristics over the observation period, and free-text analysis of unstructured responses describing the telemedicine experience using the BERTopic algorithm and a language model.

Results: A total of 27 435 telemedicine users completed surveys from May 2020 to October 2023 (median [IQR] age, 65 [55-72] years; 15 072 female [54.9%]; 1771 Asian [6.7%], 1339 Black [5.1%], 22 742 White [85.9%]). Overall, 18 025 of 24 418 patients (73.8%) rated their first telemedicine visit as good as or better than an in-person visit, and 4606 (18.9%) rated it superior to an in-person visit. The proportion of patients rating a telemedicine visit superior to an in-person visit evolved from 17% in 2020 to 20% in 2023. Structured questions revealed a positive view of telemedicine, while free-text analyses highlighted issues with technology.

Conclusions and relevance: In this survey study of perspectives on telemedicine visits, a large majority of patients at a comprehensive cancer center expressed satisfaction with telemedicine visits in proportions that remained consistent beyond the end of the pandemic. These findings challenge health care systems to integrate telemedicine into routine cancer care and to overcome remaining technical challenges and barriers to ease of use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者对远程医疗就诊报告的看法。
重要性:COVID-19 大流行推动了远程医疗在癌症治疗中的快速应用。然而,患者对远程医疗的体验仍然知之甚少:了解患者对综合癌症中心远程医疗就诊的满意度:这项调查研究包括 2020 年至 2023 年期间在美国一家癌症中心就诊的癌症患者。符合条件的患者在通过在线患者门户进行首次远程医疗预约后,用英语填写了调查问卷。数据分析时间为 2024 年 1 月至 6 月:患者对远程医疗体验进行了调查,并与现场就诊进行了具体比较。结构化项目包括对具体就诊的满意度、对未来使用远程医疗的偏好以及技术易用性;还包括非结构化的自由文本回答:表示远程医疗就诊优于或优于现场就诊的患者比例。次要结果包括对远程医疗使用障碍的多变量分析和观察期间按人口特征划分的患者体验差异,以及使用 BERTopic 算法和语言模型对描述远程医疗体验的非结构化回答进行自由文本分析:从 2020 年 5 月到 2023 年 10 月,共有 27 435 名远程医疗用户完成了调查(年龄中位数[IQR]为 65 [55-72] 岁;女性 15 072 [54.9%];亚裔 1771 [6.7%],黑人 1339 [5.1%],白人 22 742 [85.9%])。总体而言,24 418 名患者中有 18 025 名(73.8%)将首次远程医疗就诊评为 "好 "或 "优于面诊",4606 名(18.9%)将其评为 "优于面诊"。将远程医疗就诊评为优于现场就诊的患者比例从 2020 年的 17% 发展到 2023 年的 20%。结构化问题显示了人们对远程医疗的积极看法,而自由文本分析则强调了技术方面的问题:在这项关于远程医疗就诊观点的调查研究中,一家综合癌症中心的绝大多数患者对远程医疗就诊表示满意,这一比例在大流行结束后仍保持不变。这些发现对医疗保健系统提出了挑战,即如何将远程医疗整合到常规癌症治疗中,以及如何克服剩余的技术挑战和易用性障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Network Open. Meal Timing Interventions for Weight Loss and Metabolic Health-What Does the Evidence Tell Us So Far? Saving Children's Lives Through Universal Pediatric Readiness Is a Wise Investment. Anemia Acuity Effect on Transfusion Strategies in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Secondary Analysis of the MINT Trial. Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1